Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

► remove from comparison Intel P9600

The Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9550 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. The newer Core i3-330M should deliver a similar performance due to the hyperthreading support.

The P9600 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T9600

► remove from comparison Intel T9600

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 is a high end dual core CPU for laptops (at the time of introduction). Compared to the faster T9900 it does not support the new power saving C1E state. The newer Core 2 Duo P9700 offers a similar performance but features a lower TDP of 28 Watt.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9600 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9600 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T99003.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P97002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T96002.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP96002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P95002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T94002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P88002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T93002.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P87002.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP94002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P86002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T83002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP93002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P84002.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75702.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P75502.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T67702.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL96002.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P74502.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66702.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T66002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T81002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P73502 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65002.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL94001.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93801.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T64002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL93001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU96001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU94001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU73001.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU93001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2660 MHz2800 MHz2100 MHz
FSB10661066800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.212V45 nm1.05-1.2125 V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478Socket P (BGA479, PGA478)PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86x86
$348 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo T9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T6570 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2971 Points (27%)
min: 3060     avg: 3204     median: 3106.5 (28%)     max: 3541 Points
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (20%)     max: 2314 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5507 Points (8%)
min: 5538     avg: 5936     median: 5801 (8%)     max: 6785 Points
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (6%)     max: 4284 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
4768 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
2462 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 877     avg: 900     median: 899.5 (11%)     max: 922 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 27     avg: 28.1     median: 27.7 (6%)     max: 29.7 s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2375 Points (5%)
min: 2465     avg: 2524     median: 2517 (5%)     max: 2598 Points
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 16     avg: 16.3     median: 16 (3%)     max: 16.98 s
98%
1 T6570 +
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 39     avg: 39.8     median: 39.5 (2%)     max: 40.98 s
99%
1 T6570 +
min: 57.9     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 1033     avg: 1052     median: 1034 (5%)     max: 1088 s
99%
1 T6570 +
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 25986     avg: 26074     median: 26073.5 (12%)     max: 26161 MIPS
73%
1 T6570 +
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 19701     avg: 20127     median: 20126.5 (15%)     max: 20552 MFLOPS
70%
1 T6570 +
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 5911     avg: 6761     median: 6798 (43%)     max: 7573 Points
69%
1 T6570 +
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (29%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T9600 +
5.6 Points (80%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6570 +
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T9600 +
min: 5700     avg: 5703     median: 5703 (6%)     max: 5706 Points
68%
1 T6570 +
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (4%)     max: 4040 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 → 105% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 77% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 15. 06:45:22

#0 checking url part for id 450 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 397 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 11 Aug 2022 13:13:36 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.011s ... 0.012s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.013s

#80 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s

#81 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#82 getting avg benchmarks for device 450 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.014s

#84 got single benchmarks 450 +0.008s ... 0.022s

#85 getting avg benchmarks for device 397 +0s ... 0.022s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.023s

#87 got single benchmarks 397 +0.016s ... 0.039s

#88 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0s ... 0.04s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#90 got single benchmarks 466 +0.013s ... 0.053s

#91 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.053s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.054s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.055s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#114 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#120 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#121 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#122 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#123 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#124 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#125 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#126 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#127 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#128 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#129 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#130 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#131 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#132 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#133 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#134 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#135 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#136 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#137 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#138 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#139 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#140 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#141 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#142 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#143 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#144 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#145 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#146 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#147 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#148 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.061s

#149 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#150 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#151 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#152 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#153 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#154 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#155 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#156 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#157 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#158 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#159 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#160 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#161 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#162 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#163 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#164 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#165 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#166 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.063s

#167 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#168 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#169 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#170 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.064s

#171 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#172 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.064s

#173 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.065s

#174 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.065s

#175 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.065s

#176 return log +0s ... 0.065s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)