Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Intel Core 2 Duo P9600

► remove from comparison Intel P9600

The Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9550 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. The newer Core i3-330M should deliver a similar performance due to the hyperthreading support.

The P9600 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.

The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.

show full text
ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6570
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P96002.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T65702.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2660 MHz2100 MHz
FSB1066800
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm1.05-1.212V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization Technology (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
$348 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo P9600Intel Core 2 Duo T6570

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 T6570 +
1.2 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2971 Points (27%)
min: 1589     avg: 2167     median: 2274 (20%)     max: 2314 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
5507 Points (8%)
min: 2963     avg: 4042     median: 4276 (6%)     max: 4284 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
4768 Points (4%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 T6570 +
2462 Points (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T6570 +
1170 s (14%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T6570 +
36.8 s (7%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2375 Points (5%)
min: 1326     avg: 1751     median: 1820 (4%)     max: 1886 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 24     avg: 27.5     median: 25.1 (5%)     max: 36 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 57.9     avg: 66.5     median: 61 (3%)     max: 86 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 1342     avg: 1534     median: 1344 (6%)     max: 1916 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 15404     avg: 17907     median: 19000 (9%)     max: 19317 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 10662     avg: 13404     median: 14160 (11%)     max: 15390 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 3419     avg: 4583     median: 4691 (29%)     max: 5134 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T6570 +
5.1 Points (73%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 T6570 +
5 Points (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T6570 +
min: 3764     avg: 3902     median: 3902 (4%)     max: 4040 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 77% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 03. 03:48:06

#0 checking url part for id 450 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:13:02 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.005s ... 0.005s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 450 +0s ... 0.007s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#47 got single benchmarks 450 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0s ... 0.015s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.015s

#50 got single benchmarks 466 +0.014s ... 0.029s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.029s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.031s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.031s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.031s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.031s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.032s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#68 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.033s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.033s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#75 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.034s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.034s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#93 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.035s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.035s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.036s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.037s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.037s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.037s

#100 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.037s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.034s ... 0.071s

#102 return log +0.004s ... 0.075s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)