The Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 was a upper middle class dual core CPU for laptops, at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo T9550 except for the lower TDP of 25 versus 35 Watt).
Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the P9600 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. The newer Core i3-330M should deliver a similar performance due to the hyperthreading support.
The P9600 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.
The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).
The Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Penryn core but offers only 2 MB level 2 cache and a slow clock rate of 2.1 GHz. Compared to the Core 2 Duo T6500, the T6570 offers Virtualization VT-x and is therefore aimed at business notebooks.
The performance should be suited for non demanding applications like office, internet, entry level video editing or image correction. CPU intense games may be limited by the power of the T6570.
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 → 100%n=3
Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 → 77%n=3
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
log 30. 07:29:41
#0 checking url part for id 450 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 466 +0s ... 0s
#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 28 Sep 2023 15:16:16 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#4 composed specs +0.022s ... 0.023s
#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.023s
#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 450 +0.003s ... 0.026s
#7 got single benchmarks 450 +0.01s ... 0.036s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 466 +0.002s ... 0.038s
#9 got single benchmarks 466 +0.021s ... 0.059s
#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.059s
#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.059s ... 0.118s