Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 vs AMD E1-1200

Intel Core 2 Duo P8400

► remove from comparison Intel P8400

The Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 is a dual core processor for laptops. It features 2.26 GHz and a shared level 2 cache of 3 MB. Due to the smaller cache (Core 2 Duo T-Models got usually 6 MB at this clock rate), the TDP is only 25 Watt (instead of the 35 Watt of the T-models).

The performance of the P8400 is on par with the fast Turion II Ultra with about 2.4 to 2.6 GHz. Modern demanding games like Supreme Commander may be limited by the CPU performance. High end gamers should choose a higher clocked Core 2 Duo (or Core i5 / i7).

The P8400 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo P8400 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

AMD E1-1200

► remove from comparison

The AMD E1-1200 (codename Zacate, not to be confused with the Ryzen 3 1200 from 2017) is a dual-core processor for small notebooks and netbooks. It is produced on a 40 nm process and offers a relatively powerful integrated GPU and a single channel DDR3-1066 memory controller. Compared to the older E-300, which is based on the same chip, the E1-1200 offers a 100 MHz higher CPU clock rate.

The E1-1200 has two Bobcat cores running at 1.4 GHz (no Boost here) that can access 512 KB of L2 cache per core. In comparison to the Atom processors, the Bobcat architecture uses an "out-of-order" execution and is therefore faster at the same clock speed.

The integrated Radeon HD 7310 GPU offers 80 shaders and an UVD3 video decoder. Compared to the slow GMA 3150 in the Atom processors, an HD 7310 offers a lot more performance and is about as fast as the Nvidia ION graphics solution. The HD 7310's clock rate is 500 MHz to be very similar to the HD 6310 (488 - 500 MHz depending on the APU).

Performance

The average E1-1200 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N2807 and the AMD E-300, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is an outrageously slow chip, as of mid 2022.

Power consumption

This E-series APU has a default TDP of 18 W, meaning an active cooling solution is pretty much a must.

The AMD E1-1200 is built with a 40 nm process for very, very, very low, as of 2022, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo P8400AMD E1-1200
CodenamePenrynZacate
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoAMD E-Series
Series: E-Series Zacate
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 « 2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-2000 compare1.75 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E2-1800 compare1.7 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-450 compare1.65 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-350 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1500 compare1.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E1-1200 « 1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD E-240 compare1.5 GHz1 / 1 cores
Clock2260 MHz1400 MHz
FSB1066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB1 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP25 Watt18 Watt
Transistors410 Million
Technology45 nm40 nm
Voltage1.05-1.15 V
Die Size107 mm275 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketSocket PFT1 (BGA413)
FeaturesSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, Ehnaced Halt State (C1E), 64 Bit, Trusted Execution TechnologyDDR3-1066 RAM (sin. chan.), PCIe 2 [?], MMX (+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A
Architecturex86x86
$209 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comwww.amd.com
iGPUAMD Radeon HD 7310

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.47     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (1%)     max: 0.54 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 0.27     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.28 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2418     avg: 2527     median: 2497 (15%)     max: 2882 Points
min: 888     avg: 906     median: 912 (6%)     max: 918 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4507     avg: 4701     median: 4630 (3%)     max: 5314 Points
min: 1654     avg: 1709     median: 1682 (1%)     max: 1791 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 1887     avg: 1909     median: 1913 (1%)     max: 1926 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 984     avg: 1000     median: 1008 (1%)     max: 1008 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
34.2 s (7%)
min: 74     avg: 78.7     median: 76 (15%)     max: 86.2 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 2347     avg: 2479     median: 2410 (28%)     max: 2679 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 398     avg: 417.5     median: 417.5 (1%)     max: 437 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1922     avg: 2030     median: 2036 (4%)     max: 2084 Points
min: 837     avg: 872     median: 873.5 (2%)     max: 905 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 21.75     avg: 22.1     median: 22 (5%)     max: 22.71 s
min: 48.44     avg: 54.1     median: 57 (12%)     max: 57 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 50.7     avg: 51.5     median: 51.8 (2%)     max: 52.2 s
min: 110.5     avg: 120.8     median: 124 (5%)     max: 128 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1212 s (5%)
min: 2718     avg: 2755     median: 2766 (12%)     max: 2780 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
21204 MIPS (10%)
8000 MIPS (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
15993 MFLOPS (12%)
6460 MFLOPS (5%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 P8400 +
min: 3410     avg: 5117     median: 5201.5 (11%)     max: 6255 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 P8400 +
5.2 Points (74%)
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 3.4     avg: 3.5     median: 3.6 (46%)     max: 3.6 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 3518     avg: 4111     median: 4340 (3%)     max: 4475 Points
min: 1347     avg: 1594     median: 1645.5 (1%)     max: 1738 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
min: 598     avg: 602     median: 604 (1%)     max: 605 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
8205 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
596 Points (2%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 E1-1200 +
748 Points (1%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1437 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1179 Points (8%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1597 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1433 Points (3%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 E1-1200 +
1440 Points (4%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 → 100% n=10

Average Benchmarks AMD E1-1200 → 40% n=10

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 27. 20:45:56

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 398 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 3146 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1758998756s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Sep 2025 05:17:37 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.005s ... 0.005s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 398 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 398 +0.019s ... 0.025s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 3146 +0s ... 0.025s

#10 got single benchmarks 3146 +0.006s ... 0.031s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.031s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.014s ... 0.045s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.048s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)