Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron N3050 vs Intel Celeron N2920 vs Intel Celeron N3060

Intel Celeron N3050

► remove from comparison Intel N3050

The Intel Celeron N3050 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.16 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Compared to its predecessor Celeron N2815 (1.86 - 2.13 GHz), the N3050 offers an almost identical performance. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

Intel Celeron N2920

► remove from comparison Intel N2920

The Intel Celeron N2920 is a power efficient quad-core SoC for entry-level notebooks. It is clocked at 1.86 - 2.0 GHz and part of the Bay Trail-M platform. Thanks to the specially optimized 22 nanometer low-power process (P1271) with tri-gate transistors, performance and energy efficiency have been significantly improved compared to previous Intel Atom CPUs.

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the new Silvermont architecture, which is an out-of-order design for the first time. The increased utilization of the pipeline and many other improvements (optimized branch prediction, increased buffers, enhanced decoders) have increased the performance per clock by about 50 percent. At the same time, however, the Hyper-Threading feature of the previous generation has been removed. Other major changes are the support for new instruction set extensions such as SSE 4.1 and 4.2 as well as AES-NI (depending on the model).

Performance

Thanks to the improved performance per clock and the 4 cores, the Celeron N2920 is significantly faster than previous Intel Atoms, e.g. the N2800. On average, the N2920 competes with AMDs Kabini APU A4-5000. For most everyday tasks such as Internet or Office the performance is adequate, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics (Bay Trail) is based on the Intel Gen7 architecture, which supports DirectX 11 and is also found in the Ivy Bridge series (e.g. HD Graphics 4000). With only 4 EUs (Execution Units) and a relatively low clock speed of up to 844 MHz, the GPU is even slower than the HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge). Therefore, only older and less demanding games will run fluently.

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at a TDP of 7.5 watts. Thus, the chip can be used in compact subnotebooks and doesn't require extensive cooling systems.

Intel Celeron N3060

► remove from comparison Intel N3060

The Intel Celeron N3060 is a low-end dual-core SoC for notebooks, which has been presented in April 2015. It is clocked at 1.6 - 2.48 GHz and part of the Braswell platform. Thanks to its new 14 nanometer low-power process (P1273) with tri-gate transistors, energy efficiency has been significantly improved compared to its predecessor architecture Bay Trail (e.g. Celeron N2840). The N3060 is successor (refresh) to the Celeron N3050 and compared to it it offers a improved Turbo clock rate (2.48 vs 2.1 GHZ).

In addition to the CPU cores, the SoC offers a DirectX 11.2-capable GPU as well as a DDR3L Memory Controller (2x 64 bit, 25.6 GB/s).

Architecture

The processor cores are based on the Airmont architecture, which is basically a slightly modified shrink of the previous Silvermont core. While performance per clock has not been improved, the more efficient 14 nm process leads to a better utilization of the CPU Burst (alias Turbo Boost) and a therefore somewhat higher overall performance.

Performance

Depending on the cooling of the SoC, the Boost clock rate of 2.48 can be held for longer periods and therefore leading to a faster performance as the older Celeron N3050 that can only reach 2.16 GHz. Using Windows, the CPU is adequate for simple everyday tasks such as light Internet browsing or office applications, but not for complex software or modern games.

Graphics

The HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) is based on the Intel Gen8 architecture, which supports DirectX 11.2 and is also found in the Broadwell series (e.g. HD Graphics 5300). With 12 EUs (Execution Units) and a clock speed of up to 600 MHz, the GPU is almost twice as fast as the HD Graphics (Bay Trail), but still not powerful enough to handle modern 3D games. The GPU also supports 4K/H.265 video acceleration. Although featuring a different name, the GPU was not changed from the N3050 (named HD Graphics alone).

Power Consumption

The entire SoC is rated at an TDP of 6 watts (SDP 4 watts). Thus, the chip can be cooled passively.

ModelIntel Celeron N3050Intel Celeron N2920Intel Celeron N3060
CodenameBraswellBay Trail-MBraswell
SeriesIntel CeleronIntel CeleronIntel Celeron
Series: Celeron Braswell
Intel Celeron N31601.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N31501.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N30601.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N3050 « 1.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N30001.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29401.83 - 2.25 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N29301.83 - 2.16 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N2920 « 1.86 - 2 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28402.16 - 2.58 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N29101.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N28302.16 - 2.41 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28202.17 - 2.39 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28151.86 - 2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28102 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28081.58 - 2.25 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28071.58 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28061.58 - 2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N28051.46 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N31601.6 - 2.24 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N31501.6 - 2.08 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Celeron N3060 « 1.6 - 2.48 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N30501.6 - 2.16 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Celeron N30001.04 - 2.08 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock1600 - 2160 MHz1860 - 2000 MHz1600 - 2480 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 42 / 2
TDP6 Watt7.5 Watt6 Watt
Technology14 nm22 nm14 nm
max. Temp.90 °C105 °C90 °C
SocketFCBGA1170FCBGA1170FCBGA1170
FeaturesIntel HD Graphics (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 600 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/sHD Graphics (Bay Trail, 313 - 844 MHz), Dual-Channel DDR3L-1066 (max. 8 GB), Wireless DisplayIntel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell, 12 EUs, 320 - 700 MHz), Wireless Display, Quick Sync, AES-NI, max. 8 GB Dual-Channel DDR3L-1600 (25,6 GB/s), 5x USB 3.0, 4x PCIe 2.0, 2x SATA 6.0 Gbit/s
iGPUIntel HD Graphics (Braswell) (320 - 600 MHz)Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail) (313 - 854 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 400 (Braswell) (320 - 700 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
$107 U.S.$107 U.S.$107 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.comark.intel.com
L1 Cache224 KB

Benchmarks

min: 116     avg: 118.5     median: 118.5 (1%)     max: 121 Points
min: 68     avg: 71.8     median: 72.5 (0%)     max: 74 Points
min: 32     avg: 32.5     median: 32.5 (9%)     max: 33 Points
min: 36     avg: 37.8     median: 38 (11%)     max: 39 Points
min: 1.38     avg: 1.4     median: 1.4 (2%)     max: 1.47 Points
min: 0.8     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (1%)     max: 0.86 Points
min: 0.37     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.38 Points
min: 0.41     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (10%)     max: 0.46 Points
min: 1011     avg: 1030     median: 1030 (6%)     max: 1049 Points
min: 1216     avg: 1253     median: 1267 (8%)     max: 1275 Points
min: 3434     avg: 3530     median: 3530 (3%)     max: 3626 Points
min: 2256     avg: 2352     median: 2397 (2%)     max: 2402 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 2935     avg: 2943     median: 2943 (2%)     max: 2951 Points
min: 4945     avg: 5095     median: 5094.5 (3%)     max: 5244 Points
3426 Points (2%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 1568     avg: 1573     median: 1572.5 (2%)     max: 1577 Points
1800 Points (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 1740     avg: 1757     median: 1757 (21%)     max: 1773 s
962 s (11%)
1361 s (16%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 52     avg: 54.4     median: 55.2 (11%)     max: 56.1 s
32 s (6%)
43.1 s (9%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 514     avg: 548     median: 529 (1%)     max: 619 Points
327%
1 N2920 +
1728 Points (3%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 4.7     avg: 4.7     median: 4.7 (2%)     max: 4.77 fps
8.4 fps (3%)
5.5 fps (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 22.98     avg: 24.8     median: 25.5 (6%)     max: 25.8 fps
42.1 fps (10%)
28.4 fps (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.04     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (2%)     max: 0.059 GB/s
0.1 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.063     avg: 0.1     median: 0.1 (1%)     max: 0.0939 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (3%)
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 0.337     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (1%)     max: 0.427 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (1%)
0.5 GB/s (1%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 943     avg: 1150     median: 1243 (3%)     max: 1263 Points
150%
1 N2920 +
min: 1821     avg: 1861     median: 1860.5 (4%)     max: 1900 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 22     avg: 32.6     median: 33.6 (7%)     max: 41.3 s
43.7 s (9%)
27.5 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 61     avg: 82     median: 88 (4%)     max: 91.1 s
95 s (4%)
61.2 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1566     avg: 1829     median: 1896.5 (8%)     max: 1956 s
2035 s (9%)
1566 s (7%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
22880 MIPS (11%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 N2920 +
12360 MFLOPS (9%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 N3050 +
2247 Points (2%)
160%
1 N2920 +
3606 Points (3%)
min: 1485     avg: 1582     median: 1582 (4%)     max: 1679 Points
min: 918     avg: 995     median: 993 (2%)     max: 1076 Points
15979 Points (13%)
10140 Points (8%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
8087 Points (7%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 N3060 +
min: 10498     avg: 11007     median: 11006.5 (9%)     max: 11515 Points
1355 Points (3%)
min: 668     avg: 735     median: 735 (2%)     max: 802 Points
1952 Points (3%)
1124 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1127 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1911 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1087 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3060 +
1834 Points (2%)
108%
1 N3060 +
1708 Points (3%)
106%
1 N3060 +
913 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 1594     avg: 1616     median: 1615.5 (3%)     max: 1637 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 895     avg: 905     median: 904.5 (14%)     max: 914 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 N3050 +
2477 Points (13%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 N3050 +
2241 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 N3050 +
2168 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 N3050 +
2115 Points (4%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 N3050 +
2194 Points (6%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 4926     avg: 5391     median: 5082.5 (6%)     max: 7633 ms
103%
1 N3060 +
min: 4901     avg: 4929     median: 4928.5 (6%)     max: 4956 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 378.8     avg: 407.1     median: 406.4 (4%)     max: 444.5 ms
42%
1 N3060 +
min: 366.5     avg: 785     median: 976 (11%)     max: 1013 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 N3050 +
min: 4059     avg: 6704     median: 7291 (5%)     max: 7545 Points
106%
1 N3060 +
min: 7341     avg: 7793     median: 7735 (6%)     max: 8303 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3050 → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N2920 → 145% n=22

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron N3060 → 116% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 23. 17:32:26

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6781 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 4993 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8067 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755963145s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 22 Aug 2025 05:18:47 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.009s ... 0.009s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6781 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#9 got single benchmarks 6781 +0.019s ... 0.028s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 4993 +0.001s ... 0.029s

#11 got single benchmarks 4993 +0.005s ... 0.033s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8067 +0.001s ... 0.034s

#13 got single benchmarks 8067 +0.018s ... 0.052s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.047s ... 0.099s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.099s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)