Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 9810

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

Samsung Exynos 9810

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9810

The Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series (at least partly). It integrates eight CPU cores (octa core) in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at 2.9 GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 1.9 GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung (most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898).

The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports Cat.18/13 LTE for up to 1.2 Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload.

As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 (only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20). Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card.

The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos (as before 4k120 H.265/HEVC, H.264 and VP9 de- and encoding). 

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process (the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process) that should also help with some of the performance gains.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 810Samsung Exynos 9810
SeriesHiSilicon Samsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Series: Exynos Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 « 1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Samsung Exynos 9825 compare1.9 - 2.73 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9820 compare1.9 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Samsung Exynos 9810 « - 2.9 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos M3 / Cortex-A55
Clock1880 - 2270 MHz <=2900 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm10 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, BaidouARM Mali-G72MP18 GPU , 4x Exynos M3 (max 2.9 GHz), 4x Cortex-A55 (max 1.9 GHz) big.LITTLE, LPDDR4x Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6ARM Mali-G72 MP18
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturernews.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
0.7 pt (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (21%)     max: 27654 Points
min: 18756     avg: 23944     median: 26226 (22%)     max: 26851 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (44%)     max: 3972 Points
min: 2546     avg: 2717     median: 2601.5 (31%)     max: 3120 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (43%)     max: 4003 Points
min: 2561     avg: 2752     median: 2649.5 (30%)     max: 3148 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (25%)     max: 604 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (3%)     max: 1949 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
679 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2033 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2836 Points (28%)
min: 3688     avg: 3721     median: 3698 (37%)     max: 3776 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7891 Points (9%)
min: 8786     avg: 8874     median: 8874 (10%)     max: 8963 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3786 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8491 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
min: 5895     avg: 5915     median: 5915 (9%)     max: 5935 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
min: 1961     avg: 1965     median: 1965 (29%)     max: 1969 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
0 Points (0%)
min: 895     avg: 1039     median: 1039 (8%)     max: 1183 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
0 Points (0%)
min: 1898     avg: 2002     median: 2001.5 (18%)     max: 2105 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
0 Points (0%)
min: 10213     avg: 10328     median: 10328 (20%)     max: 10443 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
0 Points (0%)
min: 5651     avg: 5656     median: 5656 (11%)     max: 5661 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
0 Points (0%)
min: 6025     avg: 6099     median: 6098.5 (16%)     max: 6172 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2472     avg: 2950     median: 2646 (3%)     max: 3731 ms
min: 2060     avg: 2509     median: 2394 (3%)     max: 3189 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (15%)     max: 17925 Points
min: 12933     avg: 14397     median: 14711.5 (13%)     max: 15233 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (17%)     max: 97 Points
min: 63     avg: 67.8     median: 68 (14%)     max: 72 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 214090     avg: 218110     median: 217950 (74%)     max: 222290 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 7800     avg: 8235     median: 8294 (25%)     max: 8612 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 53528     avg: 55588     median: 55698 (68%)     max: 57538 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 91292     avg: 92956     median: 92887 (29%)     max: 94690 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 80534     avg: 86884     median: 88577 (54%)     max: 91540 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 236552     avg: 243663     median: 243861 (43%)     max: 250577 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
58288 Points (49%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
51005 Points (41%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
117851 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
102716 Points (37%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
329860 Points (32%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
217082 Points (29%)
min: 121702     avg: 154312     median: 154312 (20%)     max: 186922 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4294 Points (23%)
min: 2385     avg: 2407     median: 2407 (13%)     max: 2429 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
min: 5088     avg: 5342     median: 5341.5 (11%)     max: 5595 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
min: 5184     avg: 5411     median: 5305 (35%)     max: 5851 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points
min: 5736     avg: 6022     median: 5891 (29%)     max: 6571 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=17

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 96% n=17

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 17. 20:00:05

#0 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.053s ... 0.054s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.054s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.016s ... 0.07s

#7 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.011s ... 0.081s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 +0.003s ... 0.084s

#9 got single benchmarks 9632 +0.013s ... 0.097s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.097s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.07s ... 0.167s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.17s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.172s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.177s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.182s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.188s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.193s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.197s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.203s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.062s ... 0.264s

#21 min, max, avg, median took s +0.01s ... 0.275s

#22 return log +0.049s ... 0.324s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)