Notebookcheck Logo

HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Samsung Exynos 9609

HiSilicon Kirin 810

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 810

The HiSilicon Kirin 810 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2019 and contains 8 processor cores. Two fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores with up to 2.27 GHz and six small power efficient ARM Cortex-A55 cores with up to 1.88 GHz (bigLITTLE). Furthermore, the SoC integrates a mid range graphics card called ARM Mali-G52 MP6 with 6 clusters. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 810 integrates a Ascend D100 Lite NPU (Da Vinci architecture). The integrates LTE modem supports Cat.12/13 with Dual Sim VoLTE. For photography, the Kirin 810 integrates the Kirin ISP4.0. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X at up to 2133 MHz. Furthermore, WiFi 802.11ac and Bluetooth 5.0 are integrated in the chip.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

Samsung Exynos 9609

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9609

The Samsung Exynos 9609 (or Exynos 7 Series 9609) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (big.LITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.2 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.6 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9609 offers 100 MHz less clock speed for both clusters.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9609 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

ModelHiSilicon Kirin 810Samsung Exynos 9609
SeriesHiSilicon Samsung Exynos
CodenameCortex-A76/-A55Exynos 7 Series
Series: Exynos Exynos 7 Series
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 compare1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 « 1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
Samsung Exynos 9611 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 compare1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 « 1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Clock1880 - 2270 MHz1600 - 2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm10 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 2x Cortex-A76 (2.2 GHz) + 6x Cortex-A55 (1.88 GHz, big.LITTLE), LTE Cat-12 1400 Mbps Downlink, Cat-13 200 Mbps Uplink, Bluetooth 5, WiFi a/b/g/n/ac, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
iGPUARM Mali-G52 MP6ARM Mali-G72 MP3
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 810
0.7 pt (53%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 18123     avg: 23401     median: 24426 (21%)     max: 27654 Points
min: 22441     avg: 22718     median: 22718 (19%)     max: 22995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3501     avg: 3731     median: 3720 (14%)     max: 3972 Points
min: 2045     avg: 2171     median: 2170.5 (8%)     max: 2296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3463     avg: 3749     median: 3782 (43%)     max: 4003 Points
min: 1979     avg: 2062     median: 2062 (24%)     max: 2145 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 592     avg: 598     median: 598 (25%)     max: 604 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1890     avg: 1920     median: 1919.5 (3%)     max: 1949 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2836 Points (28%)
min: 1601     avg: 1603     median: 1603 (16%)     max: 1605 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7891 Points (9%)
min: 5273     avg: 5324     median: 5324 (6%)     max: 5375 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1628 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5087 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
5223 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
1478 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
5173 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
1507 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
0 Points (0%)
1527 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
0 Points (0%)
2425 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
0 Points (0%)
10469 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
0 Points (0%)
5204 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
0 Points (0%)
6123 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2472     avg: 2950     median: 2646 (3%)     max: 3731 ms
min: 4188     avg: 4202     median: 4202 (5%)     max: 4216 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15947     avg: 16825     median: 16604 (15%)     max: 17925 Points
min: 9807     avg: 9808     median: 9808 (9%)     max: 9809 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 71     avg: 83.7     median: 83 (17%)     max: 97 Points
min: 58     avg: 63     median: 63 (13%)     max: 68 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 90285     avg: 99443     median: 99443 (34%)     max: 108601 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
min: 10737     avg: 11106     median: 11105.5 (34%)     max: 11474 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
min: 34447     avg: 36043     median: 36042.5 (44%)     max: 37638 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
min: 39807     avg: 39885     median: 39884.5 (12%)     max: 39962 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
min: 53992     avg: 57415     median: 57415 (35%)     max: 60838 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
min: 139138     avg: 144448     median: 144448 (26%)     max: 149757 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 55189     avg: 62040     median: 58957 (49%)     max: 71973 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 45079     avg: 53673     median: 47554 (38%)     max: 68387 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 56693     avg: 68299     median: 64645 (12%)     max: 83558 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 92494     avg: 97432     median: 94457 (34%)     max: 105346 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 259370     avg: 291444     median: 295579 (28%)     max: 319383 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
217082 Points (29%)
131830 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4294 Points (23%)
min: 3954     avg: 3972     median: 3972 (21%)     max: 3990 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7541     avg: 8133     median: 7695 (50%)     max: 9164 Points
min: 6578     avg: 6695     median: 6695 (44%)     max: 6812 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9189     avg: 10361     median: 9824 (49%)     max: 12070 Points
min: 8188     avg: 8545     median: 8545 (43%)     max: 8902 Points

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 810 → 100% n=12

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9609 → 74% n=12

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 18:37:55

#0 checking url part for id 12116 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11407 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.065s ... 0.066s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.066s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 12116 +0.015s ... 0.081s

#7 got single benchmarks 12116 +0.013s ... 0.094s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 11407 +0.003s ... 0.097s

#9 got single benchmarks 11407 +0.008s ... 0.105s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.105s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.06s ... 0.165s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.169s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.174s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.178s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.182s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.187s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.191s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.196s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.2s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.047s ... 0.247s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.248s

#22 min, max, avg, median took s +0.006s ... 0.255s

#23 return log +0.026s ... 0.281s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)