Notebookcheck

HP Pavilion x2 10-n013dx Convertible Review

Versatile and affordable… The Pavilion x2 10-n013dx is the latest in HP’s rather crowded convertible line, sporting a familiar detachable design and a power-sipping Intel chipset intended to handle the basics. But with its multimode design and reasonable components, it’s an enticing candidate for the price tag.

Working For Notebookcheck

Are you a techie who knows how to write? Then join our Team!

Currently wanted: 
News Editor - Details here
Italian Translator
 - Details here

Like most manufacturers, HP has been paying lots of attention to the convertible market recently. Earlier this year, we saw their Stream x360 turning the heads of prospective Chromebook owners, and now the Pavilion x360, with options ranging up to a Core M CPU, is working on shaming lower-powered passively-cooled machines in the realm of processing prowess (at the expense of affordability and battery life, of course).

But for folks looking for a good old budget machine, yet unwilling to compromise the versatility of their daily routines to the likes of Chrome OS, the $299 Pavilion x2 10 might be just the ticket. With a paltry 2 GB of RAM, an Intel Atom Z3736F CPU, and 32 GB of eMMC storage, the specs certainly more closely resemble that of a Chromebook than a Windows machine. But with Windows 10 on board (or, at the very least, available for a day-one upgrade), it handles the basics without too much hassle. And it does so with an IPS screen, great battery life, and a surprisingly usable keyboard for its size, to boot. Let’s see how it fares throughout our typical array of benchmarks and tests.

HP Pavilion x2 10-n013dx (Pavilion x2 Series)
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Core: 313 - 646 MHz, 10.18.10.4252
Memory
2048 MB 
, DDR3 1333 MHz
Display
10.1 inch 16:10, 1280 x 800 pixel, yes, HP Display MS_9001, IPS, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Bay Trail Host Bridge
Storage
,  GB 
, Hynix HBG4e (32 GB eMMC)
Soundcard
Intel SST Audio Device
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 1 HDMI, Audio Connections: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: microSD, Sensors: Accelerometer; Gyroscope; Ambient light sensor; eCompass; Hall sensor; Temperature sensor
Networking
Realtek RTL8723BS (b/g/n), Bluetooth 4.0
Battery
33 Wh Lithium-Polymer, 2-cell
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 32 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HP TrueVision HD
Additional features
Speakers: 2.0, front-mounted, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 12 Months Warranty
Weight
1.16 kg ( = 40.92 oz / 2.56 pounds), Power Supply: 128 g ( = 4.52 oz / 0.28 pounds)
Price
300 Euro

 

Case

The Pavilion x2 10-n013dx’s case resembles the general design of the much higher-priced (and larger) Envy x2 13-j002dx, but of course, with none of the metal and a lighter overall build. It mimics the strategy, however, with the notable dual front-facing speakers on the tablet portion and the detachable keyboard base. Speaking of which, the x2’s base features strong magnets to hold the tablet in place when positioned atop the guides, and the design seems to work well. The tablet can actually be fastened either facing inward or outward from the keyboard, which is a novel approach; this also allows the machine to adopt any of the four different operating modes (Laptop, Tablet, Tent, and Stand) popularized by Lenovo’s Yoga series without the need for the now-ubiquitous 360-degree hinge. It is worth noting that there is a delay of over two seconds before any screen rotation occurs, something that we did not experience with the recently-evaluated Asus Chromebook Flip or some more powerful Windows-based convertibles (such as the Surface Pro 3).

Unique as this design may be, both approaches to convertibility (Yoga and Pavilion x2) do come with their own sets of pros and cons. For instance, while it’s nice not having to deal with the weight or the awkwardness of the keyboard base unit while working in tablet mode, the x2 is a bit more cumbersome to use, and the weight of the tablet portion tends to tip the machine backward when sitting on a flat surface (a common problem with detachable 2-in-1 designs). Still, the overall size and weight of the machine places it squarely amongst the ranks of many Chromebooks and renders it incredibly portable.

In terms of overall build quality, the x2 isn’t bad, but its plastic construction obviously disappoints when viewed adjacent to, say, the recently-reviewed Asus Chromebook Flip C100PA, which manages a rigid aluminum design for an even lower price than the HP. Flex is easily provoked on both the base unit and tablet portion with a little bit of twisting, and audible creaks follow suit. Also concerning is the fact that the mechanism for holding the tablet onto the base appears to be made entirely from plastic. At least the screen seems somewhat safe from pressure from behind, which is the most likely form of physical stress. It’s worth mentioning that the hinge also prevents the tablet from vibrating annoyingly while typing or tapping is occurring.

Connectivity

The x2 features a basic array of ports, limited by comparison to many competing machines even at this price point. With just a single conventional USB 2.0 port, connectivity to multiple devices will require a hub, or an adapter/Type-C cable to work with the USB Type-C port which doubles as a charging port (the included AC adapter does not have a detachable USB cable and is for charging only). Micro-HDMI is a nice inclusion, if not par for the course at this point. The microSD slot helps somewhat to mitigate the constraints of the 32 GB of onboard eMMC storage.

All of the ports (except for the combo audio jack) are located on the right side of the tablet while in notebook mode, which is a convenient location.

Front/top: Power button
Front/top: Power button
Left: Combo audio jack
Left: Combo audio jack
Right: Volume rocker, Windows button, microSD, micro-HDMI, USB Type-C/Charging port, USB 2.0
Right: Volume rocker, Windows button, microSD, micro-HDMI, USB Type-C/Charging port, USB 2.0

Communication

The x2’s internal 802.11ac WLAN adapter supports just 1x1 connectivity, though at least it’s better than the wireless-N of previous generations. Bluetooth 4.0 is also on board. Of course, no Ethernet is available in such a small package. We did not experience any issues with wireless connectivity or range while using the device with our Asus RT-AC68U router.

Accessories

The Pavilion x2’s AC adapter weighs in at a measly 128 g, which is hardly larger than most phone chargers. Apart from that, nothing else is included.

Maintenance

The Pavilion x2 at first seems intimidating to open, but with some care and the proper plastic opening tools, disengaging the perimeter clips between the screen and the plastic back isn’t all that challenging. Care must be taken not to break a single cable for the docking connector, which is mounted to the plastic back. However, once inside, there isn’t much to do anyway; only the battery is replaceable.

The x2's internals; note the connecting cable between the halves
The x2's internals; note the connecting cable between the halves
A close-up of the guts
A close-up of the guts

Input Devices

Keyboard

In light of the Pavilion x2’s 10-inch form factor, the keyboard has necessarily shrunk to roughly 93% the size of a normal keyboard. Fortunately, apart from a brief adjustment period, it’s thoroughly usable, and it’s quiet, to boot. We were pleased to be met with a well-tuned actuation force and a comfortable sense of feedback, and before long we were typing with relative ease in spite of the size constraints. While the keys are not backlit, they are quite visible due to the white background and dark lettering.

Touchpad

The touchpad isn’t quite as cheery. Although the surface is fairly comfortable, it’s comparably small, and the integrated buttons leave a lot to be desired. Dragging and dropping is a real chore with the x2’s touchpad, though gestures do work well. Two-finger scrolling is smooth and fairly quick, but it can’t quite live up to the immediacy of Chrome OS and Mac OS X’s implementations. Fortunately, there is a third method of control that can help to partially alleviate these struggles…

Touchscreen

The touchscreen works as well as any other, with good accuracy and response speed and accurate interpretation of gestures (which are also possible on the touchpad). Thanks to the IPS display, the touchscreen is convenient to use in any of the x2’s modes and at any angle.

The keyboard is surprisingly comfortable despite a slightly shrunken form factor
The keyboard is surprisingly comfortable despite a slightly shrunken form factor
The clickpad is less positive
The clickpad is less positive

Display

The Pavilion x2 10-n013dx includes a 10.1-inch LED-backlit IPS multitouch glossy display panel with a resolution of 1280x800, which factors out to a pedestrian 149 PPI. On the other hand, the inclusion of an IPS panel signals the fortunate trend (finally) toward nicer displays in the budget notebook segment, driven by competition and manufacturing costs.

271.4
cd/m²
291.6
cd/m²
269.8
cd/m²
292.1
cd/m²
316.1
cd/m²
288.2
cd/m²
298.3
cd/m²
312.6
cd/m²
301.8
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
X-Rite i1Basic Pro 2
Maximum: 316.1 cd/m² Average: 293.5 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 85 %
Center on Battery: 316.1 cd/m²
Contrast: 967:1 (Black: 0.327 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.18 | 0.8-29.43 Ø6.4
ΔE Greyscale 5.51 | 0.64-98 Ø6.6
64% sRGB (Argyll) 40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll)
Gamma: 2.01
HP Pavilion x2 10-n013dx
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3736F
Asus Transformer Book T300 Chi
HD Graphics 5300, 5Y71, SanDisk SSD i110 128GB
Microsoft Surface Pro 3
HD Graphics 4400, 4300U, Hynix HFS128G3MNM
Microsoft Surface 3
HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), Z8700, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Dell Venue 10 Pro 5055
HD Graphics (Bay Trail), Z3735F, Hynix HCG8E 64 GB
Apple iPad Air 2
PowerVR GXA6850, A8X, 128 GB eMMC Flash
Screen
18%
12%
26%
3%
25%
Brightness middle
316.1
368.1
16%
355.3
12%
399
26%
436
38%
423
34%
Brightness
294
375
28%
338
15%
380
29%
418
42%
427
45%
Brightness Distribution
85
92
8%
91
7%
90
6%
92
8%
92
8%
Black Level *
0.327
0.458
-40%
0.33
-1%
0.49
-50%
0.58
-77%
0.61
-87%
Contrast
967
804
-17%
1077
11%
814
-16%
752
-22%
693
-28%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 *
6.18
4.36
29%
4.72
24%
1.66
73%
5.17
16%
2.86
54%
Greyscale DeltaE2000 *
5.51
2.63
52%
6.53
-19%
2.75
50%
4.68
15%
2.37
57%
Gamma
2.01 119%
2.08 115%
2.17 111%
2.22 108%
2.31 104%
2.43 99%
CCT
6510 100%
6743 96%
6707 97%
6358 102%
6652 98%
6941 94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
40
66.94
67%
59.37
48%
64.4
61%
88
120%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
64
98.8
54%
Colorchecker DeltaE2000 max. *
3.24

* ... smaller is better

The x2’s average brightness of 293.5 cd/m² is more than adequate for indoor use, and the brightness distribution of 85% lends a uniform appearance. Thanks to the black value of 0.327 cd/m², it also manages a good contrast ratio of 967:1.

Our color measurements reveal lackluster sRGB coverage of 64% (40% of AdobeRGB), which, of course, will not appease any photography enthusiasts—but otherwise, it comes with the territory.

vs. sRGB
vs. sRGB
vs. Acer Aspire Switch 10E
vs. Acer Aspire Switch 10E
vs. Lenovo Miix 3 8
vs. Lenovo Miix 3 8
vs. Microsoft Surface 3
vs. Microsoft Surface 3

Meanwhile, CalMAN5 produces unexpectedly optimistic results, at least, post-calibration, where we were able to achieve an average dE2000 of 3.68, a grayscale average of 2.19, and total gamma/CCT Avg values very close to ideal (see our screenshots for more details). On the other hand, the situation out of the box isn’t quite as rosy, with dE grayscale and ColorChecker averages of 5.51 and 6.18 (respectively; ideal: 0), along with lower than normal gamma of 2.01 (ideal: 2.2). Generally speaking, deltaE values of below 3 indicate mostly indiscernible levels of inaccuracy. Blues are by far the most deviant here, with a precalibration DeltaE of over 11.

Color analysis, pre-calibration
Color analysis, pre-calibration
Saturation analysis, pre-calibration
Saturation analysis, pre-calibration
Grayscale analysis, pre-calibration
Grayscale analysis, pre-calibration
Color analysis, post-calibration
Color analysis, post-calibration
Saturation analysis, post-calibration
Saturation analysis, post-calibration
Grayscale analysis, post-calibration
Grayscale analysis, post-calibration

Predictably, the x2 struggles outdoors and in other bright environments due to the highly reflective screen surface. The good brightness and contrast do make up for this somewhat, but not enough to render use in anything but shaded areas comfortable. Viewing angles are excellent (as is typically the case for IPS screens), though the practicality of operating the device at extreme angles is limited once again by the glossiness of the screen finish.

In the shade
In the shade
In the sunlight
In the sunlight

Performance

No one is expecting the HP Pavilion x2 10 to be a powerhouse, though passively-cooled Windows devices always struggle in terms of power efficiency and performance as compared to their less sophisticated Chrome OS counterparts. Hopefully, then, the Intel Atom Z3736F CPU which is included alongside the 2 GB of DDR3 1333 MHz (single-channel) RAM will be enough to carry the x2 through its basic tasks.

Subjectively speaking, the machine certainly sleeps and wakes quickly (around 3 seconds maximum to wake and become usable) and is fast to open a browser and get to surfing. Applications also launch fairly rapidly, and we experienced few issues switching to and fro between them until, of course, we had a moderate number of them running. With a browser and a few tabs, a Windows Explorer window, and the Weather app running in the foreground, memory consumption was roughly 1.5 / 1.9 GB. There isn’t a heck of a lot of headroom there, but since the eMMC memory isn’t terribly slow (as we’ll see in a bit), even resorting to virtual memory paging doesn’t exactly bring the system to its knees.

As always, we also attempted a second run of 3DMark 11 while running on battery power only. The result was 203, which is a mere 7 points (3.4%) below our original result of 210, suggesting that full performance is available in battery mode. Finally, LatencyMon eventually complained about possible minor issues with real-time audio or video streaming; however, these are few and far between in reality.

CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z CPU
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Caches
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Mainboard
CPU-Z Memory
CPU-Z Memory
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
ComputeMark
ComputeMark
HD Tune
HD Tune
Cinebench R10 32-bit
Cinebench R10 32-bit

Quality journalism is made possible by advertising. We show the least amount of ads whenever possible. We intentionally show more ads when an adblocker is used. Please, switch off ad blockers.

Processor

The Pavilion x2 10-n013dx ships with an Intel Atom Z3736F SoC, which is a quad-core chip from the Bay Trail-T platform clocked at 1.33 – 2.16 GHz. While this latest offering from Intel’s tablet CPU lineup no longer features HyperThreading, it makes up for it with improved performance per clock and a more power-efficient design overall. In fact, the entire SoC is rated at an SDP of just 2.2 W, which translates to a TDP of less than 4 W; this is why the x2 can survive without a cooling fan.

The Z3736F is similar in capability to upper mid-range ARM SoCs, and it competes with AMD’s Kabini APU A4-5000. Although it is significantly faster than previous Intel Atom chips, it still isn’t meant for any true heavy lifting. Going too far beyond the basic office tasks and web browsing quickly reveals the chipset’s weaknesses, as it soon becomes a bottleneck when installing large programs or attempting such tasks as high-resolution photo editing. Of course, this is not what the Pavilion x2 is meant to handle; it competes instead directly with the likes of Chromebooks and tablets, yet it is capable of more by comparison, if not simply due to the fact that it is running full-blown Windows.

For much more information on the Z3736F as well as direct comparisons to other comparable CPUs, see our dedicated page here.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
713
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
2309
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
1423
Help

System Performance

While it is hard to gauge cross-platform system performance thanks to the limitations of the benchmarking tools available, PCMark offers a valuable comparative tool for use with other Windows-based tablets. PCMark 7 yields a score of 2348, which is not at all a bad result. This places it in the same ballpark as such competitors as the Acer Aspire Switch 10E (with 2350, which happens to house a nearly identical Atom Z3735F), and the Dell Venue 10 Pro 5055 (2351), and is not terribly far behind the Lenovo Miix 2 11 (3141), which is actively cooled! Meanwhile, the Microsoft Surface 3, equipped with a Cherry Trail-based successor to the x2’s CPU, also leads by a considerable margin with 3029—an impressive feat for a passively-cooled device.

PCMark 7 Score
2348 points
Help

Storage Devices

The Pavilion x2 10 features solid-state memory, but it’s not the blazingly fast conventional SSD variety you’d find in larger tablets like the Surface Pro 3. Instead, similar to other Bay Trail-based tablets, the x2 adopts eMMC internal memory, which is still quite nimble, but notably slower than traditional SSD storage. One look at our benchmarks reveals the differences: the x2’s storage is much more comparable to that of a conventional hard drive. Having said that, it’s not slow; and with the quick access time and low power consumption, it’s a faithful companion for an inexpensive convertible.

The biggest issue will certainly be the available storage capacity, which is really less than half of the roughly 29 GB you start with after completing an installation of Windows 10 and clearing out the old installation and setup-related data. There is a microSD slot for expandable memory, but of course, it’s substantially slower than even the eMMC memory. The internal memory cannot be upgraded, meanwhile, as it’s soldered to the board. So the situation with the x2 is once again quite similar to that of a Chromebook; the user will be left to apportion the rest of his or her data via the availability of OneDrive space (or similar) instead in the cloud.

A quick test with three different 2.5-inch external hard drives revealed no issues with powering the drives, whether the tablet is docked or undocked (as no secondary battery is included in the x2’s keyboard base).

Transfer Rate Minimum: 86.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 119.2 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 100.2 MB/s
Access Time:
Burst Rate:
CPU Usage: 4.4 %

GPU Performance

The 3DMark 11 score of 211 isn’t going to make anyone’s day, but the x2 has more than enough horsepower to handle basic Windows Store games with ease. We were unable to install any conventional games on the Pavilion x2 due primarily to the storage constraints. However, for purposes of comparison, the new Surface 3 tablet absolutely demolishes the Bay Trail offerings with a 3DMark 11 score of 562—yet it still cannot handle conventional games on anything other than the lowest settings.

3DMark 11 Performance
210 points
Help

Emissions

System Noise

The Pavilion x2 10 features a fanless design and flash-based storage, and as such, it is absolutely silent.

Temperature

With average idle temperatures of 31.8 °C and 30.2 °C on top and bottom, respectively, the Pavilion x2 10 remains relatively comfortable throughout lightweight use—though there is a stray warm spot that reached up to 35.8 °C in our measurements on the right side of the front of the unit. Under load, things heat up appreciably, with averages jumping up to 36.6 °C and 35.3 °C and the right middle quadrant of the bottom of the device reaching 45.4 °C, which is uncomfortable. These averages are actually lower than those of the Microsoft Surface 3, but the hot spots are markedly warmer. The Surface’s situation is likely more desirable and can likely be attributed to the magnesium casing’s natural spreading of the heat.

Max. Load
 30 °C34.2 °C41.4 °C 
 30.4 °C33.8 °C44.2 °C 
 33.6 °C36.8 °C44.6 °C 
Maximum: 44.6 °C
Average: 36.6 °C
40.6 °C34.6 °C30.4 °C
45.4 °C31.2 °C29.8 °C
42 °C33.4 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 45.4 °C
Average: 35.3 °C
Power Supply (max.)  38.2 °C | Room Temperature 23.5 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

Stress Test

Using Prime95 to stress the CPU to 100% produces initial clock rates across all four cores of 1.6 GHz stably (frequencies never reach the design maximum for the SoC of 2.16 GHz). Temperatures of course begin to steadily rise at this point, but during the 15 minutes of stress we imposed, they never climbed above 62 °C.

Full GPU stress (using FurMark) provokes starting frequencies of 620 MHz (the maximum for the chip), until higher temperatures of closer to 73 °C, when performance drops to the 300 – 450 MHz range.

Predictably, under combined GPU and CPU stress, the tablet can’t manage much. We recorded maximum temperatures of 74 °C and frequencies of 300 MHz (GPU) and 1333 MHz (CPU). The unit was practically inoperable under these conditions, of course.

Speakers

The Pavilion x2’s dual front-facing speakers flank the screen (and the actual drivers are situated at slightly different heights, but you wouldn’t know it unless you looked for it). Though the low frequencies obviously suffer due to the size, the speakers actually sound quite good, with clear highs and reasonable volume devoid of any distortion. Part of this is actually due to the (basic, yet effective) post-processing software that is included and enabled by default. Both features (audio enhancements and virtual surround) seem appropriate for universal use.

Battery Life

As we touched on previously, battery life is one area where Chromebooks generally excel over competing Windows-based counterparts thanks to the increased power demands of running a complex operating system. However, we’ve seen great strides with Windows 10 toward narrowing that gap, primarily by way of maintaining low system requirements and implementing additional power conservation steps as the battery charge begins to thin.

The Pavilion x2 likely benefits from this increased efficiency when all variables are taken into account, and as compared to recent devices running Windows, we do seem to be witnessing some improvements. For instance, the Acer Aspire Switch 10E SW3 (with a 29.7 Wh battery) lasted for 6 hours and 30 minutes in our Wi-Fi Surfing v1.3 benchmark, but the Pavilion x2, with an only slightly (11%) larger 33 Wh battery, manages 7:40 in that same benchmark. Microsoft’s Surface 3 tablet lasts for 7:17 with just a 28.4 Wh battery, and the recently-reviewed Chromebook Flip, meanwhile, held on for 7 hours and 56 minutes—yet again with a comparably-sized battery (31 Wh).

Although it is of less consequence, on low brightness and with Airplane Mode enabled (running the Battery Eater Pro Readers Test), the Pavilion x2 10 couldn’t even eke out 9 hours of life. We saw 8:29 total, which is multiple hours below most other devices, including the aforementioned Acer Aspire Switch (15:43) and Microsoft Surface 3 (13:48), as well as the Asus Chromebook Flip (15:19). However, this is unlikely to bother most users unless they plan to spend a very long time unplugged and can live with extremely low brightness during that period.

What may in fact bother users, however, is the substantial charging time required to fill the x2’s battery: we recorded nearly six hours plugged in before the tablet was fully-charged coming from a remaining 5% capacity.

Battery Eater Pro Classic Test
Battery Eater Pro Classic Test
Battery Eater Pro Readers Test
Battery Eater Pro Readers Test
Notebookcheck Wi-Fi Surfing v1.3
Notebookcheck Wi-Fi Surfing v1.3
Battery Runtime
Idle (without WLAN, min brightness)
8h 29min
NBC WiFi Websurfing Battery Test 1.3
7h 40min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 39min

Pros

+ Affordable machine running full Windows
+ Clever transformative multimode design with fully detachable tablet portion
+ IPS touchscreen features good contrast and brightness
+ Keyboard is better than expected
+ Performance is adequate for a device of its class

Cons

- Construction quality and materials are nothing special
- Constrained storage space, especially for a Windows-based device
- Somewhat limited port selection
- Not enough horsepower to manage anything other than the most menial tasks
- Touchpad with integrated buttons leaves much to be desired
- For its intended use, some may find the agility and simplicity of a Chromebook more advantageous

Verdict

In a world increasingly populated by inexpensive Chromebooks and low-grade tablets, convertible Windows-based devices have finally begun to carve out a portion of the budget space for their own inhabitance. While the HP Pavilion x2 10-n013dx admittedly identifies physically with the price point (MSRP $299), it is a device greater than the sum of its parts. For starters, and perhaps most importantly, it checks all the boxes you’d expect to see from a Chromebook carrying roughly the same price tag—thanks in part to Windows 10’s improvements in the realm of hybrid PC functionality.

But the Windows 10 upgrade is only part of the equation. The Pavilion x2 10 also sports a fairly attractive (albeit low-resolution) IPS LED touchscreen with good brightness and contrast, flanked by serviceable speakers producing clear sound. It has a better keyboard (though slightly shrunken) than might be expected for a machine of its class. Its performance is adequate thanks to a solid Intel SoC and inoffensive eMMC speeds, yet its battery life does not suffer materially and remains great overall. It also manages to include fast 802.11ac Wi-Fi and a convertible design which offers all the same multimode transformations alongside a detachable keyboard base for authentic tablet operation. And all of this is underscored by the sheer fact that, unlike so many of the devices against which it competes, it actually runs full-blown Windows, too.

Users looking for a very basic multimode device who would rather not surrender the uncontested versatility of the Windows operating system should at least consider it, provided they can accept its other limitations.

Of course, there are drawbacks. The x2’s construction quality, saddled by a plastic frame and all the flexy creaks that accompany it, pales in comparison to even some recent Chromebooks. The port selection is limited, with just a sole USB 2.0 port available in addition to the usual micro-HDMI and audio jack. Limited available storage space renders the installation of many larger programs difficult or even impossible and is sure to become more of an issue as time passes, even considering the availability of microSD to somewhat alleviate the constraints.

And, of course, while its specifications are enough for basic functionality without too many hiccups, stepping just beyond this threshold quickly reminds the user that, while Windows is on board, all of the possibilities affiliated with its availability are not. Chrome OS has the distinct advantage of leveraging its comparative simplicity for greater agility, and even with the advancements Windows 10 has made to the overall budget convertible package, this difference is evident through such observations as slower responses to screen rotations and boot/resume operations.

Nevertheless, with the Pavilion x2 10-n013dx, the list of plausible alternatives to Chromebooks and Android tablets in the low-end computing segment grows one larger. Users looking for a very basic multimode device who would rather not surrender the uncontested versatility of the Windows operating system should at least consider it, provided they can accept its other limitations.

HP Pavilion x2 10-n013dx - 09/16/2015 v4(old)
Steve Schardein

Chassis
63 / 98 → 64%
Keyboard
73%
Pointing Device
69%
Connectivity
47 / 80 → 59%
Weight
73 / 35-78 → 88%
Battery
90%
Display
80%
Games Performance
21 / 68 → 31%
Application Performance
50 / 87 → 57%
Temperature
82%
Noise
100%
Audio
50 / 91 → 55%
Camera
68 / 85 → 80%
Average
67%
75%
Convertible - Weighted Average

Pricecompare

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > Archive of our own reviews > HP Pavilion x2 10-n013dx Convertible Review
Steve Schardein, 2015-09- 9 (Update: 2015-09-14)
Steve Schardein
Steve Schardein - Review Editor - @othersteve
In grade school, my first computer—an Apple IIGS—started it all for me. Later, in the nineties, if I wasn’t repairing computers for family and friends, I was busy cooking up nifty Visual Basic projects and playing PC games like Command & Conquer and Heroes of Might and Magic. Soon, much of my free time was spent moderating popular gaming forums and covering the industry for various websites. All the while, I never stopped repairing computers, and in 2006, I started a technology consulting company in Louisville, KY—Triple-S Computers—which I have been fortunate to nurture to great success by specializing in not only repairs, but also new machine consultations and purchasing, data recovery, and malware/security. And since 2012, I have proudly contributed many dozens of reviews to Notebookcheck, a site which I have long considered to be the ultimate authority on laptops and related technology. Today, I am truly living my dream: still a child at heart, ever-curious, constantly learning, and thankful to you, our readers.