Notebookcheck

FIFA 17 Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks

Engine Switch. Every year, football fans get to choose between the two giants, Pro Evolution Soccer and FIFA. The latter has just been released in its 17th iteration with gleaming graphics. We ran FIFA 17 on multiple notebook and desktop GPUs to check how well the game runs.
Florian Glaser, Sven Kloevekorn (translated by Vinay Pradhan), 🇩🇪

For the original German article, see here.

Engine

What do FIFA 17, Mirror's Edge CatalystStar Wars BattlefrontNeed for SpeedDragon Age Inquisition and Battlefield 4 all have in common? They are all produced by EA studios and are based on the Frostbite 3 engine, made by DICE. Like its Frostbite brethren, the new FIFA game has good graphics, but the overall result is not as spectacular as fans may have wished for.

At the normal viewing distance, there are no noticeable changes to the graphics between FIFA 16 and the current edition. The predecessor used the Ignite engine, which fans should know from FIFA 14. In close-ups (Cutscenes, etc.), it is very clear that the game has been tuned up. The lighting, shadows and reflections have been improved to provide more detailed in-game models. Frostbite 3 has even increased the level of detail in the audience/crowd.

FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17

The atmosphere of FIFA games is always good, thanks to original teams, fan chants and cool video shorts. The game feels like a live football broadcast. The professional commentators add to the authenticity, but, after a while, they start repeating themselves. After a short trial, we were impressed with the game. The animations and KI have improved since the predecessor.

However, FIFA 17 seems quite pale/"milky" from a distance (the next installment should have a more realistic color tone). Up close, the colors are much crisper and add to the virtual experience. When the camera zooms in during replay scenes, the frame rate is limited to 30 fps on most systems (half the frames of the screen). This limitation cannot be removed by deactivating the 60 fps frame lock in the settings.

FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17

Many games using the Frostbite 3 engine offer extensive options in the graphics menu. FIFA 17 is an exception to the rule as it provides only a handful of settings. The user can adjust the resolution, the picture mode, the frame locks, overall quality and anti-aliasing. EA only offers MSAA, which is known to be demanding on the hardware. However, during our test, the game ran fluidly despite 2x and 4x MSAA. In fact, the fps drop was so small with MSAA active, that we suspect this feature is not fully working. On the low preset, the blades of grass disappear. Higher presets simulate the grass but do not differ in much else. FIFA 17 looks good from medium upwards.

We did not love the mouse and keyboard interface, as every now and then, the game shows gamepad buttons and the standard controls are suboptimal. In short: you should use a controller.

FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17
FIFA 17

Let us take another look at the graphics settings. The developer only allows access to this menu while outside of the game, to prevent crashes or other bugs. We observed such issues only on Intel GPUs (missing faces, freezes, frame drops, ...). Unfortunately, FIFA 17 only started on certain PCs after multiple attempts. This may be due to a defective version of .NET Framework (also the case with the predecessor).

The game has gotten a lot bigger. FIFA 16 needed 13 GB, but the 17 edition takes up to 30 GB. Overall, the game does a fine job.

Benchmark

The benchmark for our previous FIFA tests was a kick-off game between FC Bayern München and Borussia Dortmund in the "Allianz Arena". The game settings are kept the same for each iteration of FIFA: 6-minute first half, beginner level difficulty, summer, 2 PM in the afternoon and clear weather (everything else is set to normal or default).

As can be seen in the video, we just passed the ball around and tried to stay away from actions, which would trigger a replay (goals, fouls, etc.). However, despite these settings, the game performance fluctuated with every run. As such, these results are not entirely accurate. For example, you could experience lower frame rates on high settings than on ultra settings.

In general, the game can run at 60 frames per second. As soon as we reach the 7-minute mark, we stop the recording with the Fraps tool. To be safe from stutters and have enough performance reserves, we recommend at least 50 to 60 fps in the benchmark.

Results

Weaker notebook can run FIFA 17, as despite the new engine, the requirement has stayed more or less the same. As before, processor GPUs, such as, the HD Graphics 4600, are capable of running the game at 1280x720 pixels and low details. Dedicated AMD or Nvidia GPUs from the low to medium spectrum (GeForce 920M940M) can run the game at 1366x768 pixels and medium preset.

The game is a lot more demanding on the processor. As in the predecessor, if the CPU is not strong enough, the game will suffer, despite having enough frames. FIFA 17 seems to prefer a quad-core CPU. Our GeForce 920M sample with Pentium CPU did not start at first and a Kaby Lake dual-core i5-7200U with integrated HD Graphics 620 could provide 55 fps, but only in slow motion, which means the game remains unplayable. Furthermore, the latest Intel graphics drivers (even beta) still cause graphics errors in the menus and the slow motion scenes. 

A mix of FHD and high to maximum settings, including anti-aliasing, requires a stronger multimedia card, like the Radeon R9 M280X. Real gaming GPUs are only needed for 4K settings. For 3840x2160 pixels and the high preset, the user will need a GeForce GTX 965M or a GeForce GTX 870M/880M to run smoothly.

Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
Ultra
Ultra
Low
Low
Medium
Medium
High
High
Ultra
Ultra

Unlike most other games, the processor determines how well FIFA will run. Our desktop PC with a GeForce GTX 1060 and a Core i7-6700K ran the game fluidly with every setting. It performed much better than our Asus notebook, the G752VS with a GeForce GTX 1070 and a Core i7-6820HK. The GPUs become the bottleneck for entry- and middle-class platforms.

Due to the restrictive activation system of Origin, we need a lot of time to test this game on all our systems. In the next few weeks, we should be able to add more graphics cards to the comparison table.

FIFA 17
    3840x2160 High Preset     1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS     1920x1080 High Preset     1920x1080 Medium Preset     1366x768 Medium Preset     1280x720 Low Preset
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop), 4790K
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Founders Edition
213 (min: 168) fps ∼57%
377 (min: 347) fps ∼87%
AMD Radeon R9 Fury, 4790K
XFX Radeon R9 Fury Pro
172 (min: 136) fps ∼46%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK
Asus G752VS
163 (min: 143) fps ∼44%
302 (min: 269) fps ∼70%
309 (min: 279) fps ∼66%
323 (min: 301) fps ∼90%
360 (min: 328) fps ∼78%
370 (min: 331) fps ∼71%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Desktop), 6700K
Desktop PC
127 (min: 106) fps ∼34%
304 (min: 281) fps ∼71%
314 (min: 291) fps ∼67%
360 (min: 319) fps ∼100%
397 (min: 371) fps ∼86%
438 (min: 397) fps ∼84%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, 6700K
Desktop PC
124 (min: 116) fps ∼33%
296 (min: 249) fps ∼69%
308 (min: 273) fps ∼65%
356 (min: 320) fps ∼99%
401 (min: 355) fps ∼86%
429 (min: 383) fps ∼82%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
73.2 (min: 59) fps ∼20%
165 (min: 148) fps ∼38%
165 (min: 153) fps ∼35%
165 (min: 153) fps ∼46%
176 (min: 164) fps ∼38%
184 (min: 168) fps ∼35%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
62.7 (min: 53) fps ∼17%
153 (min: 131) fps ∼35%
160 (min: 143) fps ∼34%
172 (min: 159) fps ∼48%
190 (min: 178) fps ∼41%
194 (min: 180) fps ∼37%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
54.5 (min: 39) fps ∼15%
141 (min: 108) fps ∼33%
146 (min: 123) fps ∼31%
165 (min: 146) fps ∼46%
208 (min: 193) fps ∼45%
244 (min: 229) fps ∼47%
AMD Radeon R7 370, 4790K
MSI Gaming R7 370 2GB
63.9 (min: 54) fps ∼17%
147 (min: 108) fps ∼34%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ
MSI GE72 965M Ti
50.1 (min: 40) fps ∼13%
138 (min: 114) fps ∼32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
51.4 (min: 43) fps ∼14%
119 (min: 103) fps ∼28%
128 (min: 107) fps ∼27%
152 (min: 124) fps ∼42%
197 (min: 182) fps ∼42%
223 (min: 207) fps ∼43%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 4720HQ
Schenker XMG A505
41.9 (min: 33) fps ∼11%
115 (min: 96) fps ∼27%
123 (min: 108) fps ∼26%
134 (min: 114) fps ∼37%
190 (min: 168) fps ∼41%
215 (min: 185) fps ∼41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 860M, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
37.2 (min: 35) fps ∼10%
91.4 (min: 77) fps ∼21%
95.2 (min: 81) fps ∼20%
117 (min: 96) fps ∼33%
155 (min: 127) fps ∼33%
205 (min: 187) fps ∼39%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ
MSI PE60 2QD
35 (min: 28) fps ∼9%
95 (min: 77) fps ∼22%
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6700HQ
MSI CX72 6QD
42.3 (min: 32) fps ∼10%
44.3 (min: 33) fps ∼9%
89 fps ∼19%
129 fps ∼25%
NVIDIA GeForce 940M, 5700HQ
MSI GP62 2QD
13.4 (min: 10) fps ∼4%
42.1 (min: 33) fps ∼10%
42.9 (min: 33) fps ∼9%
AMD Radeon R9 M280X, FX-7600P
Asus N551ZU-CN007H
0 fps ∼0%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M, 4200M
MSI CX61-i572M
23 fps ∼5%
42 fps ∼9%
53 fps ∼10%
Intel HD Graphics 4600, 4700MQ
Schenker W504
42.2 (min: 36) fps ∼9%
59.1 (min: 46) fps ∼11%

Overview

Show Restrictions
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
 FIFA 17 (2016)
low
1280x720
Low Preset
med.
1366x768
Medium Preset
high
1920x1080
High Preset
ultra
1920x1080
Ultra Preset
4xMSAA
4K
3840x2160
High Preset
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4130
AMD Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
AMD Radeon HD 6990M
AMD Radeon HD 6450M
AMD Radeon HD 6470M
AMD Radeon HD 6350M
AMD Radeon HD 6320
AMD Radeon HD 6970M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
AMD Radeon HD 6760G2
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56
AMD Radeon HD 6770M
AMD Radeon HD 6775G2
AMD Radeon HD 6545G2
AMD Radeon HD 6430M
AMD FirePro W5170M
AMD Radeon HD 7520G
AMD Radeon HD 7490M
AMD Radeon HD 7500G
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
AMD Radeon HD 7450M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 445M
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GT 720M
53
42
23
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M
NVIDIA GeForce 9600M GT
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M
138
50.1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Desktop)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon HD 6830M
AMD Radeon HD 6520G
AMD Radeon HD 6540G2
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon HD 6380G
AMD Radeon HD 6370M
AMD Radeon HD 6290
AMD Radeon HD 6250
AMD FirePro W2100
AMD FirePro W7170M
AMD Radeon 530
AMD Radeon HD 6740G2
AMD Radeon HD 7570M
AMD Radeon HD 6520G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 6450 GDDR5
AMD Radeon HD 6330M
AMD FirePro W5130M
AMD Radeon 610
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M
181.3n2
161.35n2
103n2
98.25n2
41.9
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20
AMD Radeon HD 6630M
AMD Radeon HD 6640G2
AMD Radeon HD 7310
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 7690M
AMD Radeon HD 7340
AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon HD 6650M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Super (Desktop)
AMD Radeon HD 6730M
AMD Radeon HD 6620G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 6645G2
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
NVIDIA Quadro P4200
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4150
AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100
AMD Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
AMD Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L)
AMD Radeon R4 (Beema)
AMD Radeon R4 (Kaveri)
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
AMD Radeon HD 7430M
AMD Radeon HD 7420G
AMD Radeon HD 7370M
AMD Radeon HD 7350M
AMD Radeon HD 7400G
Intel HD Graphics 630
72
56.6
30.1
28.5
AMD Radeon HD 7850M
Intel HD Graphics 510
Intel Iris Graphics 550
Intel HD Graphics 505
Intel Iris Graphics 540
61
72
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M
95
35
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (Desktop)
279
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI (Laptop)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile
335n3
330n3
214n3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M
244
208
146
141
54.5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 870M
223
197
128
119
51.4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop)
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
NVIDIA GeForce Go 7200
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6600
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800
NVIDIA GeForce Go 6400
AMD Radeon HD 6790
AMD Radeon HD 6570M
AMD Radeon HD 6550M
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon R7 250
AMD Radeon HD 6620G
AMD Radeon HD 6530M
AMD Radeon HD 6870
AMD Radeon HD 6550D
AMD Radeon HD 6310
AMD FirePro W4190M
AMD FirePro W4100
AMD Radeon HD 6490M
AMD Radeon HD 6480G + HD 7450M Dual Graphics
AMD Radeon HD 6480G
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon 630
AMD Radeon 620
AMD Radeon 625
AMD FirePro W4170M
AMD FirePro M6000
AMD FirePro M4100
AMD FirePro M8900
AMD FirePro M4000
AMD FirePro M5100
AMD Radeon 540X
AMD FirePro M3900
AMD Radeon HD 6970
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon HD 6970M Crossfire
AMD FirePro M6100
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon R3 (Mullins/Beema)
AMD FirePro M5950
NVIDIA Quadro M620
AMD Radeon HD 6755G2
AMD Radeon HD 6950M
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Intel Iris Graphics 5100
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 110M
AMD Radeon HD 7290
AMD Radeon 520
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon HD 6515G2
AMD Radeon HD 6510G2
AMD Radeon R7 512 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon R7 384 Cores (Kaveri Desktop)
AMD Radeon HD 7470M
NVIDIA Quadro M520
NVIDIA Quadro M500M
AMD Radeon HD 6720G2
AMD Radeon R7 (Kaveri)
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
PosModel< prevnext >FIFA 17
lowmed.highultra4K
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
AMD Radeon R7 370
147
63.9
AMD Radeon Pro 560
AMD Radeon Pro 555X
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
AMD Radeon Pro 560X
AMD Radeon HD 6690G2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
(-) * Smaller values are better. / n123 Number of benchmarks for this median value / * Approximate position

 

Legend
5Stutters – This game is very likely to stutter and have poor frame rates. Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, average frame rates are expected to fall below 25fps
May Stutter – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, stutters and poor frame rates are expected.
30Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 25fps
40Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 35fps
60Fluent – Based on all known benchmarks using the specified graphical settings, this game should run at or above 58fps
May Run Fluently – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game. Based on interpolated information from surrounding graphics cards of similar performance levels, fluent frame rates are expected.
?Uncertain – This graphics card experienced unexpected performance issues during testing for this game. A slower card may be able to achieve better and more consistent frame rates than this particular GPU running the same benchmark scene.
Uncertain – This graphics card has not been explicitly tested on this game and no reliable interpolation can be made based on the performances of surrounding cards of the same class or family.
The value in the fields displays the average frame rate of all values in the database. Move your cursor over the value to see individual results.

Test Systems

Desktop-PCs Custom Nvidia Custom AMD
Mainboard Asus Z170-A Asus Z97-Deluxe
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (Skylake) Intel Core i7-4790K (Haswell)
Graphics Card Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 (6 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 (4 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 (8 GB GDDR5X)
Asus GeForce GTX 980 Ti (6 GB GDDR5)
XFX Radeon R9 Fury (4 GB HBM)
Sapphire Radeon R9 290X (4 GB GDDR5)
Sapphire Radeon R9 280X (3 GB GDDR5)
MSI Radeon R7 370 (2 GB GDDR5)
RAM 2 x 8 GB DDR4-2133 2 x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Device Crucial MX100 SSD (256 GB)
Crucial M500 SSD (480 GB)
OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
OCZ Trion 150 SSD (960 GB)
Intel SSD 530 (240 GB)
OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
OS Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Schenker Notebooks Schenker W504 Schenker XMG A505 Schenker S413
Mainboard Intel HM87 Intel HM87 Intel HM87
Processor Intel Core i7-4700MQ (Haswell) Intel Core i7-4720HQ (Haswell) Intel Core i7-4750HQ (Haswell)
Graphics Card Nvidia GeForce GTX 980M (8 GB GDDR5)
GTX 970M (6 GB GDDR5)
GTX 880M (8 GB GDDR5)
GTX 870M (6 GB GDDR5)
GTX 860M Kepler (4 GB GDDR5)
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M (2 GB GDDR5) Intel Iris Pro Graphics 5200
RAM 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 2x 4 GB DDR3-1600 2x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Device Samsung SSD 840 EVO (250 GB) Micron M600 SSD (128 GB)
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 HDD (1.000 GB)
Intel SSD
OS Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
MSI Notebooks MSI GE72 MSI PE60 MSI GP62 MSI CX61 MSI CX61
Mainboard Intel HM170 Intel HM170 Intel HM86 Intel HM86 Intel HM86
Processor Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake) Intel Core i7-6700HQ (Skylake) Intel Core i7-5700HQ (Broadwell) Intel Celeron 2970M (Haswell) Intel Core i5-4200M (Haswell)
Graphics Card Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 2016 (2 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M (2 GB GDDR5) Nvidia GeForce 940M (2 GB DDR3) Nvidia GeForce 920M (2 GB DDR3) Nvidia GeForce GT 720M (2 GB DDR3)
RAM 1 x 8 GB DDR4-2133 2 x 4 GB DDR4-2133 1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600 1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600 1 x 8 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Device Toshiba THNSNJ128G8NU SSD (128 GB)
WDC WD10JPVX HDD (1.000 GB)
OCZ Trion 100 SSD (480 GB)
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 HDD (500 GB) WDC Scorpio Blue HDD (1.000 GB)
OS Windows 10 Home 64 Bit Windows 10 Windows 10 Windows 10 Windows 7 Home Premium 64 Bit
Asus Notebooks Asus G752VS Asus N551ZU
Mainboard Intel CM236 AMD K15.1
Processor Intel Core i7-6820HK (Skylake) AMD FX-7600P (Kaveri)
Graphics Card Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 (8 GB GDDR5) AMD Radeon R9 M280X (4 GB GDDR5)
RAM 4 x 16 GB DDR4-2400 2 x 4 GB DDR3-1600
Storage Device Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7 SSD (512 GB) Samsung SSD 830 (256 GB)
OS Windows 10 Pro 64 Bit Windows 10 64 Bit
4K Monitor Nvidia Driver AMD Driver Intel Driver
2 x Asus PB287Q ForceWare 372.90 Crimson 16.9.2 15.40.28.4501
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Reviews > FIFA 17 Notebook and Desktop Benchmarks
Florian Glaser, 2016-10-14 (Update: 2016-10-18)
Florian Glaser
Editor of the original article: Florian Glaser - Managing Editor Gaming
Growing up with MS-DOS and Windows 3.1 in the early 90s, I discovered my interest in computers in my childhood. Especially computer games radiated a great fascination for me even then. From Monkey Island to Lands of Lore to Doom, everything was gambled that you could get your hands on. I have been working for Notebookcheck since 2009 with focus on high-performance gaming notebooks.