Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 990 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820

Samsung Exynos 990

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 990

The Samsung Exynos 990 is a mobile high-end SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced in the Samsung S20 line in early 2020. The processor integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M5 (Mongoose 5) cores clock up to 2.73 GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A76 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to 2.5 GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to 2 GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ.

The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro Cat.20/18 (2000 Mbps download, 210 Mbps upload). The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G77MP11 with 11 cores.

The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. In Geekbench it offers a very good single thread performance on par with the Snapdragon 865 and older Apple A11. The multi-threaded-performance is a bit below the fastest current smartphone SoCs. In Geekbench 5 it slots in below the Kirin 990 and above the older Snapdragon 855 Plus.

The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 7nm LPP (with EUV) process.

HiSilicon Kirin 820

► remove from comparison HiSilicon Kirin 820

The HiSilicon Kirin 820 is a ARM-based mid-range Octa-Core-SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It was announced mid 2020 and contains 8 processor cores. One fast ARM Cortex-A76 core with up to 2.36 GHz, three addition A76 cores at up to 2.22 (as the old Kirin 810) and four efficiency Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.88 GHz. Furthermore, the SoC integrates a 5G modem and a fast mid-range ARM Mali-G57 MP6 graphics card. For AI acceleration, the Kirin 820 integrates a DaVinci NPU.

The performance of the CPU part in our tests was slightly higher than the old Kirin 810 (thanks to the fast performance core). Huawei advertises 27% performance advantage for the CPU. The NPU and GPU have bigger performance gains with 73% and 38% more power.

The chip should also integrate Bluetooth 5 and WiFi 6.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern 7nm process at TSMC and therefore should be very energy efficient.

ModelSamsung Exynos 990HiSilicon Kirin 820
SeriesSamsung ExynosHiSilicon
CodenameExynos M5 / Cortex A-76 / Cortex-A55Cortex-A76/-A55
Clock2000 - 2730 MHz1840 - 2360 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology7 nm7 nm
FeaturesARM Mali-G77MP11 GPU, 2x Samsung Mongoose 5 Custom CPU, 2x Cortex-A76, 4x Cortex-A55 big.LITTLE, LPDDR5-5500 Memory ControllerARM Mali-G52 MP6 GPU, 1x Cortex-A76 up to 2.36 GHz, 3x A76 nup to 2.2 GHz, 4x A55 up to 1.84 GHz, big.LITTLE, 5G TDD/FDD, Bluetooth 5, WiFi 6, AGPS, Glonass, Baidou
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.hisilicon.com
Series: Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 990 compare - 2.86 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820 « 1.84 - 2.36 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 820e compare1.84 - 2.22 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 810 compare1.88 - 2.27 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 980 compare - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76/-A55
iGPUARM Mali-G57 MP6

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 990
1 pt (77%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Kirin 820
0.9 pt (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 27431     avg: 37265     median: 39747.5 (33%)     max: 42135 Points
41610 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4063     avg: 4284     median: 4273 (17%)     max: 4495 Points
4642 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3935     avg: 4240     median: 4247 (49%)     max: 4455 Points
4637 Points (53%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 903     avg: 929     median: 940 (40%)     max: 944 Points
642 Points (27%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2731     avg: 2800     median: 2787 (5%)     max: 2899 Points
2434 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 4791     avg: 4878     median: 4878 (49%)     max: 4965 Points
3113 Points (31%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 12557     avg: 12559     median: 12559 (14%)     max: 12561 Points
9860 Points (11%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4761 Points (65%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
12169 Points (30%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
9220 Points (14%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
2746 Points (41%)
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
3463 Points (28%)
4235 Points (34%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
7366 Points (67%)
5223 Points (47%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
16423 Points (32%)
17014 Points (33%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
8407 Points (17%)
7277 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
10510 Points (27%)
9969 Points (26%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2294     avg: 2387     median: 2345 (3%)     max: 2511 ms
2254 ms (3%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
478.8 ms (5%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 18094     avg: 19019     median: 19122 (17%)     max: 20022 Points
19727 Points (18%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 86     avg: 94.4     median: 97 (20%)     max: 102 Points
115 Points (24%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 14541     avg: 61956     median: 72814 (61%)     max: 79291 Points
68406 Points (57%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 70388     avg: 81327     median: 80945 (65%)     max: 91469 Points
52226 Points (42%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 77884     avg: 180239     median: 207238 (38%)     max: 214615 Points
117476 Points (22%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 123376     avg: 146474     median: 150214 (54%)     max: 157764 Points
131099 Points (47%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 296746     avg: 469996     median: 504192 (49%)     max: 527820 Points
369207 Points (36%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
653269 Points (40%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
173967 Points (48%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
238069 Points (31%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 6116     avg: 6221     median: 6178 (33%)     max: 6370 Points
8006 Points (42%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
min: 16279     avg: 16886     median: 16672 (36%)     max: 17707 Points
22692 Points (48%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 10008     avg: 10612     median: 10431 (68%)     max: 11784 Points
9527 Points (62%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 13627     avg: 14391     median: 14551 (73%)     max: 14760 Points
13099 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
507 Points (19%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 990 → 100% n=26

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 820 → 86% n=26

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 15. 18:42:34

#0 checking url part for id 11939 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12581 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 13 May 2024 05:39:12 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.076s ... 0.077s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.077s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 11939 +0.017s ... 0.094s

#7 got single benchmarks 11939 +0.018s ... 0.112s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12581 +0.013s ... 0.125s

#9 got single benchmarks 12581 +0.01s ... 0.135s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.135s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.074s ... 0.209s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.004s ... 0.213s

#13 min, max, avg, median took s +0.086s ... 0.298s

#14 return log +0.026s ... 0.324s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)