Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

Samsung Exynos 9610

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9610

The Samsung Exynos 9610 (or Exynos 7 Series 9610) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9610 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 660

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 (SD660) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. Announced in mid 2017, the SD660 is the successor to the Snapdragon 625. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.2 GHz and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz. Both clusters can also used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 512 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel 1866 MHz)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Performance

In Benchmarks of the Oppo R11, the CPU part of the Snapdragon SD660 performs between former high end Socs like the Snapdragon 821 in the Pixel XL and the Snapdragon 835. The graphics performance is however much lower, as the Adreno 512 is only a slight upgrade of the older Adreno 510 (due to the higher clock speed).

CPU

The Snapdragon 660 is based on a similar concept as ARM's big.LITTLE, which combines a low power CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 1.8 GHz) and a performance CPU cluster (2x Kyro clocked at up to 2.2 GHz). The clock speed of each cluster can be individually adjusted (but not per core) and the lowest clock speed is 310 MHz (unverified).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 14 nm process, the energy efficiency has been improved noticeably compared to its 20 nm predecessors.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameExynos 7 SeriesKryo 260Kryo 260
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 96111.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96091.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6652.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Clock1700 - 2300 MHz2200 MHz2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm11 nm14 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3Qualcomm Adreno 610Qualcomm Adreno 512 ( - 850 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.qualcomm.com
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISPAdreno 512 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 680 DSP, Specra ISP

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 660
0.5 pt (40%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
14353 Points (12%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2266 Points (9%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
2241 Points (26%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 309     avg: 311     median: 310.5 (13%)     max: 314 Points
106%
1 SD 660 +
min: 294     avg: 322.8     median: 330.5 (14%)     max: 336 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
105%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1304     avg: 1445     median: 1440.5 (3%)     max: 1595 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
102%
1 SD 660 +
min: 313     avg: 321.5     median: 321.5 (1%)     max: 330 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
95%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1127     avg: 1305     median: 1305 (4%)     max: 1483 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (17%)
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5605 Points (6%)
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (6%)     max: 5663 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1609     avg: 1628     median: 1628 (22%)     max: 1647 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5846     avg: 5860     median: 5859.5 (14%)     max: 5873 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 665 +
2272 Points (18%)
47%
1 SD 660 +
min: 1038     avg: 1079     median: 1079 (9%)     max: 1120 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 665 +
2767 Points (25%)
108%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2981     avg: 2996     median: 2995.5 (27%)     max: 3010 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 665 +
10733 Points (21%)
95%
1 SD 660 +
min: 9892     avg: 10223     median: 10223 (20%)     max: 10554 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 665 +
4516 Points (9%)
117%
1 SD 660 +
min: 5295     avg: 5302     median: 5301.5 (11%)     max: 5308 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
6117 Points (16%)
100%
1 SD 660 +
min: 6031     avg: 6141     median: 6141 (16%)     max: 6251 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3897 ms (5%)
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
min: 3796     avg: 4115     median: 3954 (5%)     max: 4769 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 SD 660 +
630 ms (7%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10322 Points (9%)
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (8%)     max: 9671 Points
min: 8463     avg: 9973     median: 10070 (9%)     max: 10945 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
62 Points (13%)
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 58 Points
min: 47     avg: 57.1     median: 59 (12%)     max: 63 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
108166 Points (37%)
108%
1 SD 660 +
min: 105973     avg: 116194     median: 117165 (40%)     max: 120479 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7831 Points (24%)
10308 Points (32%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
36958 Points (45%)
35460 Points (44%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
37658 Points (12%)
31064 Points (10%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
61747 Points (38%)
63801 Points (39%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
144194 Points (25%)
140633 Points (25%)
min: 116346     avg: 137699     median: 140898 (25%)     max: 143551 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 26864     avg: 32727     median: 31707 (27%)     max: 45742 Points
103%
1 SD 660 +
min: 26647     avg: 30836     median: 32596 (27%)     max: 33266 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 27018     avg: 36247     median: 37857 (31%)     max: 44461 Points
87%
1 SD 660 +
min: 28919     avg: 31931     median: 32883 (27%)     max: 33992 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 32489     avg: 33693     median: 33527 (6%)     max: 34855 Points
107%
1 SD 660 +
min: 33505     avg: 36822     median: 35936 (7%)     max: 41026 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 62570     avg: 68985     median: 70133 (25%)     max: 71112 Points
95%
1 SD 660 +
min: 62411     avg: 68266     median: 66442 (24%)     max: 75946 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
95%
1 SD 660 +
min: 157877     avg: 167856     median: 161462 (16%)     max: 184230 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
100%
1 SD 660 +
3240 Iter./s (100%)
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
100%
1 SD 660 +
28882 Iter./s (95%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
172805 Points (23%)
172978 Points (23%)
min: 2487     avg: 125771     median: 186416 (25%)     max: 188411 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5827 Points (38%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7029 Points (35%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
13.4 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
151 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
11.3 MB/s (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
256 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 665 +
7618 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 665 +
6505 Points (30%)
100%
1 SD 660 +
6514 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
101%
1 SD 660 +
min: 3032     avg: 3285     median: 3363 (18%)     max: 3486 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
40%
1 SD 660 +
min: 2889     avg: 4395     median: 4250 (9%)     max: 5913 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9610 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 103% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 → 104% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 20. 01:34:16

#0 checking url part for id 11346 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9944 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.025s ... 0.026s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.026s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11346 +0.003s ... 0.029s

#8 got single benchmarks 11346 +0.009s ... 0.038s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.015s ... 0.053s

#10 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.041s ... 0.094s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9944 +0.01s ... 0.104s

#12 got single benchmarks 9944 +0.042s ... 0.146s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.146s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.256s ... 0.402s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.402s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)