Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs Samsung Exynos 9609

Samsung Exynos 9610

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9610

The Samsung Exynos 9610 (or Exynos 7 Series 9610) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (bigLITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.3 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.7 GHz for power efficiency.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9610 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 665

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 665

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 (SM6125) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 260 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2 GHz (Kryo 260 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 260 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X12 LTE modem with up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload).

Power Consumption

Thanks to the new 11 nm LPP process, the energy efficiency should be quite good.

Samsung Exynos 9609

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 9609

The Samsung Exynos 9609 (or Exynos 7 Series 9609) is a mid-range SoC for Android based smartphones and tablets. It integrates 8 processor cores in two clusters (big.LITTLE concept). Four ARM Cortex A73 cores at up to 2.2 GHz for demanding tasks and four ARM Cortex A53 at up to 1.6 GHz for power efficiency. Compared to the older Exynos 9610, the 9609 offers 100 MHz less clock speed for both clusters.

The integrated LTE modem supports 4G at up to 600 Mbps download and 150 Mbps upload. Furthermore, 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 5.0 are also integrated in the chip.

The on-board ARM Mali-G72 MP3 graphics card offers three clusters and support for Vulkan, DirectX 12 and OpenGL ES 3.2.

The Exynos 9609 is manufactured in the modern 10nm FinFET process and therefore relatively power efficient and also suited for smaller smartphones.

ModelSamsung Exynos 9610Qualcomm Snapdragon 665Samsung Exynos 9609
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung Exynos
CodenameExynos 7 SeriesKryo 260Exynos 7 Series
Series: Exynos Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96111.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9610 « 1.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96091.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 « 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6621.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6602.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6361.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 260
Samsung Exynos 96111.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 96101.7 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Samsung Exynos 9609 « 1.6 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Exynos 7 Series
Clock1700 - 2300 MHz2200 MHz1600 - 2200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 88 / 8
Technology10 nm11 nm10 nm
iGPUARM Mali-G72 MP3Qualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G72 MP3
ArchitectureARMARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.com
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X12 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Specra 165 ISP

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 665
0.5 pt (38%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
14353 Points (12%)
min: 22441     avg: 22718     median: 22718 (19%)     max: 22995 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
2266 Points (27%)
min: 2045     avg: 2171     median: 2170.5 (26%)     max: 2296 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
2241 Points (26%)
min: 1979     avg: 2062     median: 2062 (24%)     max: 2145 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 309     avg: 311     median: 310.5 (13%)     max: 314 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1256     avg: 1356     median: 1371.5 (2%)     max: 1421 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 313     avg: 314     median: 314 (1%)     max: 315 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 1327     avg: 1366     median: 1379 (4%)     max: 1392 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
1721 Points (17%)
min: 1495     avg: 1509     median: 1495 (15%)     max: 1536 Points
min: 1601     avg: 1603     median: 1603 (16%)     max: 1605 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
5605 Points (6%)
min: 5134     avg: 5388     median: 5366 (6%)     max: 5663 Points
min: 5273     avg: 5324     median: 5324 (6%)     max: 5375 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1628 Points (22%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
5087 Points (12%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
5223 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
1478 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
5173 Points (8%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
1507 Points (23%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 665 +
2272 Points (18%)
1527 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 665 +
2767 Points (25%)
2425 Points (22%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 665 +
10733 Points (21%)
10469 Points (21%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 665 +
4516 Points (9%)
5204 Points (10%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
6117 Points (16%)
6123 Points (16%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
3897 ms (5%)
min: 4434     avg: 4783     median: 4562 (5%)     max: 6719 ms
min: 4188     avg: 4202     median: 4202 (5%)     max: 4216 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
10322 Points (9%)
min: 6133     avg: 8901     median: 9260 (8%)     max: 9671 Points
min: 9807     avg: 9808     median: 9808 (9%)     max: 9809 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
62 Points (13%)
min: 38     avg: 50.9     median: 51 (11%)     max: 58 Points
min: 58     avg: 63     median: 63 (13%)     max: 68 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
108166 Points (37%)
min: 90285     avg: 99443     median: 99443 (34%)     max: 108601 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
7831 Points (24%)
10308 Points (32%)
min: 10737     avg: 11106     median: 11105.5 (34%)     max: 11474 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
36958 Points (45%)
35460 Points (44%)
min: 34447     avg: 36043     median: 36042.5 (44%)     max: 37638 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
37658 Points (12%)
31064 Points (10%)
min: 39807     avg: 39885     median: 39884.5 (12%)     max: 39962 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
61747 Points (38%)
63801 Points (39%)
min: 53992     avg: 57415     median: 57415 (35%)     max: 60838 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
144194 Points (25%)
140633 Points (25%)
min: 139138     avg: 144448     median: 144448 (26%)     max: 149757 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 26864     avg: 32727     median: 31707 (27%)     max: 45742 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 27018     avg: 36247     median: 37857 (31%)     max: 44461 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 32489     avg: 33693     median: 33527 (6%)     max: 34855 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 62570     avg: 68985     median: 70133 (25%)     max: 71112 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 167305     avg: 171951     median: 169695 (16%)     max: 181432 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
172805 Points (23%)
172978 Points (23%)
131830 Points (17%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
5827 Points (38%)
min: 6578     avg: 6695     median: 6695 (44%)     max: 6812 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
7029 Points (35%)
min: 8188     avg: 8545     median: 8545 (43%)     max: 8902 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
13.4 MB/s (10%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
151 MB/s (5%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
11.3 MB/s (14%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 665 +
256 MB/s (7%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
100%
1 SD 665 +
7618 Points (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
100%
1 SD 665 +
6505 Points (30%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 3249     avg: 3328     median: 3328 (18%)     max: 3407 Points
min: 3954     avg: 3972     median: 3972 (21%)     max: 3990 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 665 +
min: 9865     avg: 10707     median: 10707 (23%)     max: 11549 Points
min:      avg: 0 (0%)     max: 0 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 665 +
3.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 665 +
1.2 Watt (1%)

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9610 → 100% n=16

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 → 103% n=16

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9609 → 105% n=16

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 30. 23:18:21

#0 checking url part for id 11346 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 11487 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 11407 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 May 2024 05:33:54 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.019s ... 0.02s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.02s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 11346 +0.002s ... 0.022s

#8 got single benchmarks 11346 +0.007s ... 0.029s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11487 +0.012s ... 0.041s

#10 got single benchmarks 11487 +0.033s ... 0.075s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11407 +0.002s ... 0.077s

#12 got single benchmarks 11407 +0.007s ... 0.084s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.084s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.177s ... 0.261s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.005s ... 0.266s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.266s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)