Notebookcheck Logo

Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G

Samsung Exynos 1380

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 1380

The Samsung Exynos 1380 is a system on a chip (SoC) designed for mid-range smartphones and tablets running on the Android operating system. The CPU is made up of two clusters, each consisting of four cores. It features four Cortex-A78 performance cores (up to 2.4 GHz) and four Cortex-A55 power-saving cores (up to 2.0 GHz). The integrated graphics unit is an ARM Mali-G68 MP5 with speeds of up to 950 MHz.

The NPU's performance has been improved by around 14 percent compared to its predecessor, with a capacity of 4.9 TOPS. Displays with up to 144 Hz and Full HD+ resolution can now be used, and the chipset supports cameras with up to 200 MPix. The chipset also includes Wi-Fi 6 and Bluetooth 5.3. Both LPDDR4x and LPDDR5 can be used as RAM, and UFS 3.1 is possible as internal storage.

The integrated modem has significantly increased download speeds, supporting both 5G-Sub6 (download: up to 3.79 Gbps (+32%), upload: up to 1.28 Gbps) and 5G-mmWave (download: up to 3.67 Gbps (+75%), upload: up to 0.92 Gbps). The upload speed for LTE (Cat. 18, download: up to 1.2 Gbps, upload: up to 0.211 Gbps (+5%)) has only been slightly improved.

The Exynos 1380 is manufactured by Samsung using the 5-nm process.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 870

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Mobile Platform (SM8250-AC) is a high-end smartphone and tablet SoC that Qualcomm announced in mid 2021. The SoC integrates a fast ‘Prime Core’ that clocks up to 3.2 GHz and three additional ARM Cortex-A77 performance cores, which can reach up to 2.42 GHz. These are complemented by four power-saving ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock up to a maximum of 1.8 GHz. Compared to the similar and older Snapdragon 865+, the Prime Core clocks 100 MHz faster and the GPU is slightly higher clocked.

Therefore, the Snapdragon 870 is slightly faster than the old Snapdragon 865 and 865 Plus and slots in behind the high end Snapdragon 888.

The Mobile Platform integrates a Qualcomm X55 5G modem with Sub-5 and mmWave support and global 5G bands with up to 7.5 GBit/s (download) speed. The SmartConnect 6800 modem supports Wi-Fi 6 with 8x8 MU-MIMU and 60 GHz 11ay up to 10 Gbps. 

The integrated GPU is still called Adreno 650 and offers a slightly higher clock speed of 670 MHz.

The on board Hexagon 698 DSP now offers a KI performance of up to 15 TOPS (up from 7 TOPS in the 855) and still uses a combination of CPU, GPU, HVX and Tensor cores. The Spectra 480 ISP is also untouched. The integrated Computer Vision Engine (CV-ISP) now supports Dolby Vision, 8K videos and 200 megapixel photos.

The built-in memory controller supports LPDDR5 with up to 2,750 MHz and LPDDR4X with 2,133 MHz.

The SoC is manufactured in the modern and power efficient 7nm process.

ModelSamsung Exynos 1380Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
SeriesSamsung ExynosQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameARM Cortex-A55 / A78Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Series: Snapdragon Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Samsung Exynos 1480 compare2.05 - 2.75 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Samsung Exynos 1380 « 2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores ARM Cortex-A55 / A78
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G « 2.42 - 3.2 GHz8 / 8 cores7 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ (Plus) compare2.42 - 3.1 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 compare2.42 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores4 MB L3 Cortex-A77 / A55 (Kryo 585)
Clock2000 - 2400 MHz2420 - 3200 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology5 nm7 nm
FeaturesNPU, Wi-Fi 802.11ax (2x2 MIMO), Bluetooth 5.3, FM Radio Rx, GNSS (GPS, Glonass, BeiDou, Galileo), Triple-ISPAdreno 650 GPU, Spectra 480 ISP, LPDDR5 2750 MHz / LPDDR4X 2133 MHz Memory Controller
iGPUARM Mali-G68 MP5 ( - 950 MHz)Qualcomm Adreno 650 ( - 670 MHz)
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturersemiconductor.samsung.comwww.qualcomm.com
L2 Cache1.8 MB
L3 Cache7 MB
TDP5 Watt

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 870
min: 1.142     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (88%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 4227     avg: 4364     median: 4375 (17%)     max: 4460 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 4176     avg: 4349     median: 4386.5 (50%)     max: 4445 Points
min: 3318     avg: 4719     median: 5046 (58%)     max: 5784 Points
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
min: 1011     avg: 1016     median: 1014.5 (27%)     max: 1023 Points
1299 Points (35%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
min: 2858     avg: 2882     median: 2882.5 (11%)     max: 2906 Points
3357 Points (13%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 771     avg: 781     median: 783 (33%)     max: 788 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 2719     avg: 2761     median: 2763 (5%)     max: 2817 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
786 Points (3%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
2766 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3550     avg: 3556     median: 3555.5 (36%)     max: 3561 Points
min: 4354     avg: 4450     median: 4411 (44%)     max: 4584 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 11130     avg: 11160     median: 11160 (12%)     max: 11190 Points
min: 10974     avg: 12029     median: 11658 (13%)     max: 13456 Points
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 870 +
4633 Points (63%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 870 +
12645 Points (31%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 870 +
11133 Points (17%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 870 +
3802 Points (57%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1099     avg: 1159     median: 1172.3 (1%)     max: 1208.8 ms
min: 1055     avg: 1401     median: 1447 (2%)     max: 1792.1 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
187 ms (2%)
312.9 ms (3%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 33801     avg: 35093     median: 34758 (31%)     max: 36155 Points
min: 20543     avg: 33246     median: 33694 (30%)     max: 41256 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 97     avg: 109.6     median: 108 (31%)     max: 123 Points
min: 46     avg: 79.8     median: 83 (24%)     max: 107 Points
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 124     avg: 131.3     median: 125 (26%)     max: 145 Points
min: 94     avg: 127.5     median: 127 (26%)     max: 155 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
100%
1 SD 870 +
min: 92692     avg: 96369     median: 95393 (80%)     max: 101022 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
100%
1 SD 870 +
min: 81684     avg: 89772     median: 92809 (75%)     max: 94824 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
100%
1 SD 870 +
min: 204986     avg: 219028     median: 211196 (39%)     max: 240902 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
100%
1 SD 870 +
min: 177606     avg: 180496     median: 181073 (66%)     max: 182809 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
100%
1 SD 870 +
min: 573296     avg: 585665     median: 588115 (57%)     max: 595585 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 505141     avg: 510383     median: 508957 (31%)     max: 518476 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 151517     avg: 153827     median: 154008 (42%)     max: 155773 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
591842 Points (78%)
5196 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
min: 33.8     avg: 36.1     median: 34.9 (26%)     max: 39.6 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
min: 121     avg: 264.3     median: 228 (7%)     max: 444 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
min: 32.3     avg: 34     median: 32.6 (40%)     max: 37.2 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
min: 478     avg: 482     median: 484 (13%)     max: 484 MB/s
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 12748     avg: 16900     median: 17384 (28%)     max: 20032 Points
min: 22767     avg: 25498     median: 26407 (42%)     max: 27389 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 11259     avg: 12568     median: 13024 (60%)     max: 13488 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
100%
1 SD 870 +
8148 Points (43%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
100%
1 SD 870 +
20550 Points (44%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
100%
1 SD 870 +
min: 10060     avg: 11688     median: 11166 (73%)     max: 14315 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
100%
1 SD 870 +
14754 Points (74%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 637     avg: 665     median: 665 (25%)     max: 703 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 5.62     avg: 6.2     median: 5.9 (3%)     max: 7.1 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 1.084     avg: 1.7     median: 1.5 (2%)     max: 2.42 Watt

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 1380 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G → 108% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 20. 14:22:59

#0 checking url part for id 15010 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13187 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 19 May 2024 05:35:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.02s ... 0.022s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.022s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15010 +0.003s ... 0.024s

#7 got single benchmarks 15010 +0.017s ... 0.041s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13187 +0.013s ... 0.053s

#9 got single benchmarks 13187 +0.043s ... 0.096s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.126s ... 0.222s

#12 return log +0.023s ... 0.245s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)