Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 6305 vs Intel Core i3-1125G4

Intel Celeron 6305

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 6305

The Intel Celeron 6305 (or 6305U) is a power efficient dual-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks based on the Tiger Lake-U generation that was announced in the third quarter of 2020. It integrates only two Willow Cove processor cores (2 threads - no Hyper-Threading/SMT). The clock speed is set at 1.8 GHz as the chip does not support Turbo Boost.

Performance

The average 6305 in our database is in the same league as the Celeron N4505, as far as multi-thread benchmark scores are concerned. This is a very poor result, as of late 2022.

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe graphics фвфзеук based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. It should offer a significantly higher performance compared to the older UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake). In the 6305U Intel calls it just UHD Graphics and it offers 48 EUs.

Other improvements from Ice Lake should be also integrated in Tiger Lake like the AI hardware acceleration and the partial integration of Thunderbolt and Wifi 6 in the chip.

The chip is produced on the improved 10nm+ process (called 10 nm SuperFin) at Intel that should be comparable to the 7nm process at TSMC (e.g. Ryzen 4000 series).

Intel Core i3-1125G4

► remove from comparison Intel i3-1125G4

The Intel Core i3-1125G4 is a 28 W quad-core SoC for laptops and Ultrabooks of the Tiger Lake family (UP3) that was introduced in September 2020. It integrates four Willow Cove processor cores (8 threads thanks to Hyper-Threading). Each core can clock from 2 GHz (guaranteed base speed @ 28 W) to 3.7 GHz (single-core boost). All cores at once can clock at up to 3.3 GHz. The faster Core i7 models offer more Level 3 cache (12 versus 8 MB in the i5) and higher clocked cores.

Another novelty is the integrated Xe GPU based on the completely new Gen 12 architecture. In the i3-1125G4 Intel names the GPU UHD Graphics and offers only 48 of the 96 EUs clocked at 400 - 1250 MHz. The GPU and CPU can together use the 8 MB of L3 cache.

Furthermore, Tiger Lake SoCs add PCIe 4 support (four lanes), AI hardware acceleration, and the partial integration of Thunderbolt 4 / USB 4 and Wi-Fi 6 in the chip.

Performance

While we have not tested a single laptop built around the 1125G4 as of October 2023, we expect the chip's multi-thread performance to be 10% to 20% lower than that of the Core i5-1135G7 (4 cores, 8 threads, somewhat higher clock speeds).

Your mileage may vary depending on how high the CPU power limits are and how competent the cooling solution of your system is.

Power consumption

This Core i3 series chip has a default TDP of 12 W to 28 W, the expectation being that laptop makers will go for a higher value in exchange for higher performance. Either way, that's a little too high to allow for passively cooled designs.

The i3-1125G4 is manufactured on Intel's third-gen 10 nm process marketed as SuperFin for average, as of early 2023, energy efficiency.

ModelIntel Celeron 6305Intel Core i3-1125G4
CodenameTiger Lake-UTiger Lake-UP3
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeIntel Tiger Lake
Series: Tiger Lake Tiger Lake-UP3
Intel Pentium Gold 7505 compare2 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 6305 « 1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1195G7 compare2.9 - 5 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1185G7 compare3 - 4.8 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-1165G7 compare2.8 - 4.7 GHz4 / 8 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1155G7 compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1145G7 compare2.6 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-1135G7 compare2.4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1125G4 « 2 - 3.7 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i3-1115G4 compare3 - 4.1 GHz2 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Clock1800 MHz2000 - 3700 MHz
L1 Cache160 KB320 KB
L2 Cache2.5 MB5 MB
L3 Cache4 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 8
TDP15 Watt28 Watt
Technology10 nm10 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGA1449BGA1449
FeaturesDDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 3, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHADDR4-3200/LPDDR4x-3733 RAM, PCIe 4, 4 GT/s bus, DL Boost, GNA, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, VMX, SMX, SMEP, SMAP, EIST, TM1, TM2, Hyper-Threading, Turbo, SST, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, TME
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs (400 - 1250 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Celeron 6305
17.3 pt (29%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 1056     avg: 1072     median: 1071.5 (1%)     max: 1087 Points
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 566     avg: 567     median: 566.5 (23%)     max: 567 Points
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
217 Points (24%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
416 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 160.8     avg: 161.1     median: 161.1 (1%)     max: 161.3 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 82.6     avg: 84     median: 84 (23%)     max: 85.3 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
1.9 Points (2%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
1 Points (24%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3465 Points (21%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6611 Points (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
1231 s (15%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
39.1 s (8%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
1210 Points (2%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 4226     avg: 4263     median: 4262.5 (2%)     max: 4299 MIPS
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 2233     avg: 2238     median: 2237.5 (26%)     max: 2242 MIPS
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
11.3 fps (0%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
61.9 fps (2%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 1.69     avg: 1.7     median: 1.7 (3%)     max: 1.71 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.1 GB/s (2%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
0.9 GB/s (2%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
min: 2824     avg: 2834     median: 2834 (20%)     max: 2844 Seconds
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
1.4 sec (30%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
18.8 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
41.3 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
905 s (4%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1723     avg: 1936     median: 1935.5 (5%)     max: 2148 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 19614     avg: 19990     median: 19990 (16%)     max: 20366 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1619     avg: 1639     median: 1638.5 (4%)     max: 1658 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2368     avg: 2391     median: 2390.5 (4%)     max: 2413 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
860 Points (20%)
1515 Points (35%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
1535 Points (6%)
5237 Points (20%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 632     avg: 638     median: 638 (21%)     max: 644 Points
1198 Points (40%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1154     avg: 1198     median: 1198 (2%)     max: 1242 Points
3738 Points (7%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 626     avg: 629     median: 628.5 (3%)     max: 631 Points
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1151     avg: 1184     median: 1183.5 (4%)     max: 1216 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2776     avg: 2825     median: 2824.5 (28%)     max: 2873 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4762     avg: 4950     median: 4949.5 (5%)     max: 5137 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1678     avg: 1681     median: 1681 (2%)     max: 1684 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
326.7 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
21416 Points (14%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 99.2     avg: 100.7     median: 100.7 (18%)     max: 102.2 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 501     avg: 508     median: 507.5 (19%)     max: 514 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
12.1 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
10.5 Watt (2%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
20.8 Watt (14%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
6.6 Watt (5%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.4 Points per Watt (11%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 6305 → 100% n=4

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i3-1125G4 → 254% n=4

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.35
log 13. 05:36:30

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12244 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12740 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1765600590s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 13 Dec 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12244 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 12244 +0.005s ... 0.012s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12740 +0.001s ... 0.013s

#10 got single benchmarks 12740 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.017s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.038s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)