Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Celeron 3867U vs Intel Core i7-7660U

Intel Celeron 3867U

► remove from comparison Intel Celeron 3867U

The Intel Celeron 3865U is an ULV (ultra low voltage) dual-core SoC based on the Kaby-Lake architecture and has been launched in the first quarter of 2017. The CPU can be found in ultrabooks as well as normal notebooks. In addition to two CPU cores clocked at 1.8 GHz (no Turbo Boost, no HyperThreading), the chip also integrates an HD Graphics 610 GPU and a dual-channel DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 memory controller. The SoC is manufactured using a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to the similar Celeron 3865, the 3867 offers a different cTDP-down option (12.5 versus 10 Watt).

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

Due to the missing Turbo Boost and the low clock speeds, especially the single thread performance is very limited which results in a lower performance even for lower demanding tasks. The performance should be noticeably slower than the Celeron 3965 which offers 400 MHz higher clocked CPU cores. Therefore, the CPU is only suited for entry level tasks like office, web surfing and multimedia.

Graphics

The integrated graphics unit called HD Graphics 610 (similar to the HD Graphics 510) represents the "GT1" version of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9). Its 12 Execution Units, also called EUs, are clocked at 300 - 900 MHz and offer a performance somewhat below the older HD Graphics 4400. Only a few games of 2015 can be played smoothly in lowest settings.

Power Consumption

Specified at a TDP of 15 W (including CPU, GPU and memory controller), the CPU is best suited for small notebooks and ultrabooks (11-inches and above). Optionally, the TDP can be lowered to 10 watts (cTDP down), reducing both heat dissipation and performance and allowing even more compact designs.

Intel Core i7-7660U

► remove from comparison Intel i7-7660U

The Intel Core i7-7660U is a fast dual-core SoC for notebooks and Ultrabooks based on the Kaby Lake architecture and was announced in January 2017. The CPU has two processor cores clocked at 2.5-4 GHz (two cores up to 3.8 GHz). The processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper Threading. It is also equipped with an Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 GPU with 64 MB eDRAm, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR4) as well as VP9 and H.265 video decoding as well as encoding. The chip is still manufactured in a 14nm process with FinFET transistors.

Compared to the Core i7-7600U, the 7660 does have a higher single-core Turbo of 4 GHz (+100 MHz), but a lower dual-core Turbo (-100 MHz) and a lower base frequency (-300 MHz). However, the CPU part can also use the 64 MB eDRAM as L5 cache.

Architecture

Intel basically uses the same micro architecture compared to Skylake, so the per-MHz performance does not differ. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.

Performance

At 2.5-4 GHz, the Core i7-7660U has a slightly lower frequency (except for the single-core Turbo) compared to the Core i7-7600U, but the CPU part can also use the 64 MB eDRAM, so the performance should be similar.

Graphics

The integrated Intel Iris Plus 640 Graphics is the GT3e model of the Kaby Lake GPU (Intel Gen. 9.5). It has 48 Execution Units running at 300-1050 MHz and the performance is comparable to a GeForce 920MX thanks to fast eDRAM cache. However, there aren't any significant improvements compared to the old Iris Pro 540, so modern games can often not be played smoothly or only at the lowest or medium settings, respectively.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors, which improves the efficiency even further. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts.

ModelIntel Celeron 3867UIntel Core i7-7660U
SeriesIntel Kaby LakeIntel Kaby Lake
CodenameKaby LakeKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
» Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 48 MB
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 88 MB
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 86 MB
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
» Intel Core i7-7660U2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 46 MB
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i3-7130U compare2.7 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 44 MB
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 43 MB
Intel Celeron 3867U1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 22 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 42 MB
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 22 MB
Clock1800 MHz2500 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB512 KB
L3 Cache2 MB4 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketBGABGA1356
FeaturesDual-Channel LPDDR3-1866/DDR4-2133/DDR3L-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 610 (300 - 900 MHz)Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 (300 - 1050 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$107 U.S.$415 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Kaby Lake Celeron 3867U

Benchmarks

Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
159 Points (1%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
134 Points (1%)
min: 397     avg: 403.5     median: 403.5 (4%)     max: 410 Points
0255075100125150175200225250275300325350375400Tooltip
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 154     avg: 158.5     median: 158.5 (49%)     max: 163 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 4.39     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (8%)     max: 4.55 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 1.84     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (6%)     max: 1.89 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 6126     avg: 6170     median: 6169.5 (55%)     max: 6213 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 13779     avg: 13809     median: 13808.5 (19%)     max: 13838 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 433     avg: 435.5     median: 435.5 (5%)     max: 438 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 12.6     avg: 12.9     median: 12.9 (3%)     max: 13.2 s
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 25     avg: 25.3     median: 25.3 (10%)     max: 25.6 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 134     avg: 136.5     median: 136.5 (36%)     max: 139 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
0.2 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
0.4 GB/s (0%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
2.4 GB/s (0%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
1257 Seconds (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 5193     avg: 5227     median: 5226.5 (11%)     max: 5260 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 4463     avg: 5069     median: 5230 (18%)     max: 5513 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
57582 Points (49%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 3823     avg: 3936     median: 3935.5 (10%)     max: 4048 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 5412     avg: 5561     median: 5560.5 (13%)     max: 5709 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 1979     avg: 1990     median: 1989.5 (11%)     max: 2000 Points
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
434 Points (19%)
Geekbench 5.4 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
873 Points (3%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2285 Points (25%)
4786 Points (52%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
3830 Points (5%)
9320 Points (12%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
4603 Points (71%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
8952 Points (22%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
8570 Points (13%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
4074 Points (67%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 927     avg: 938     median: 937.5 (1%)     max: 948 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 65.2     avg: 65.6     median: 65.6 (1%)     max: 66 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 35767     avg: 36437     median: 36436.5 (38%)     max: 37106 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.2     avg: 40     median: 40 (7%)     max: 40.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 39.2     avg: 40     median: 40 (11%)     max: 40.8 Watt
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
min: 9.73     avg: 10.1     median: 10.1 (12%)     max: 10.5 Points per Watt

Average Benchmarks Intel Celeron 3867U → 100% n=3

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-7660U → 251% n=3

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 07. 10:20:19

#0 checking url part for id 11927 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 8419 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:14:23 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.006s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.009s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.009s

#49 composed specs +0s ... 0.009s

#50 did output specs +0s ... 0.009s

#51 getting avg benchmarks for device 11927 +0s ... 0.01s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.01s

#54 got single benchmarks 11927 +0.006s ... 0.016s

#55 getting avg benchmarks for device 8419 +0.001s ... 0.017s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.017s

#58 got single benchmarks 8419 +0.008s ... 0.025s

#59 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.025s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.025s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.026s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.014s ... 0.04s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#98 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#101 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#106 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#107 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#108 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#109 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#112 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#118 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.053s

#119 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#120 return log +0.004s ... 0.057s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)