BQ Aquaris U Plus
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5.0. MP, f / 2.4, video @ 1080p / 30fps
Price comparison
Average of 9 scores (from 16 reviews)
Reviews for the BQ Aquaris U Plus
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 92% performance: 40% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: MobiFlip

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Movil Zona

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget

Positive: Powerful processor; metal case; decent cameras; high autonomy; good price. Negative: HD panel; no NFC; mediocre hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/13/2016
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Long battery life; metal case; nice design. Negative: Mediocre speakers; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: El Confidencial

Positive: Good price; decent cameras. Negative: Mediocre hardware; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: 4G News

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 85% performance: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada

Positive: High performance; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Uncomfortable volume and power buttons; poor rear camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2016
Source: Android Geek

Positive: High autonomy; excellent speakers; good cameras; good built quality. Negative: Poor display; no NFC; mediocre performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Mais Tecnologia

Positive: Nice design; good ergonomy; reliable GPS; decent cameras. Negative: Chamber lenses are too protruding.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% display: 68% mobility: 90% workmanship: 78%
Source: Helpix

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Helpix

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Helpix

Positive: Nice design; good performance; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
430: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X6 LTE (Cat. 4) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.00":
This display is tiny. You will probably see very little on the screen and be able to use mini-resolutions.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.BQ:
BQ is a Spanish company of the Mundo Reader S.L Group, which develops smartphones, tablets, 3D printers and robots.
The market shares are low and mainly concentrate on Europe. The number of reviews is quite low and the achieved ratings are average (as of 2016).
A Russian company with the same name sells smartphones. This BQ is independant from the Spanish brand.
75.67%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.