BQ Aquaris U Plus
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix 5.0. MP, f / 2.4, video @ 1080p / 30fps
Price comparison
Average of 9 scores (from 16 reviews)
Reviews for the BQ Aquaris U Plus
Source: Chinahandys.net

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 68% performance: 70% display: 50% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/10/2017
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 92% performance: 40% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 100% ergonomy: 100%
Source: MobiFlip

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Movil Zona

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% display: 60% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 80% features: 70% display: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget

Positive: Powerful processor; metal case; decent cameras; high autonomy; good price. Negative: HD panel; no NFC; mediocre hardware.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/13/2016
Source: El Androide Libre

Positive: Long battery life; metal case; nice design. Negative: Mediocre speakers; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/24/2016
Source: El Confidencial

Positive: Good price; decent cameras. Negative: Mediocre hardware; low performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: 4G News

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 77% price: 85% performance: 75% mobility: 85% workmanship: 70%
Source: Aberto ate de Madrugada

Positive: High performance; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Uncomfortable volume and power buttons; poor rear camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/15/2016
Source: Android Geek

Positive: High autonomy; excellent speakers; good cameras; good built quality. Negative: Poor display; no NFC; mediocre performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Mais Tecnologia

Positive: Nice design; good ergonomy; reliable GPS; decent cameras. Negative: Chamber lenses are too protruding.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/27/2016
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 75% display: 68% mobility: 90% workmanship: 78%
Source: Helpix

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Helpix

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Helpix

Positive: Nice design; good performance; fast fingerprint sensor. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/09/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
430: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X6 LTE (Cat. 4) modem.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.