ZTE Blade A6
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 8 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the ZTE Blade A6
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 60% performance: 40% display: 48% mobility: 68% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/20/2017
Rating: Total score: 87% price: 93% performance: 60% features: 60% mobility: 100% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 100%
Source: Movil Zona

Positive: Decent display; good hardware; nice cameras; high autonomy; good connectivity; low price.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/25/2017
Source: Mega Obzor

Positive: Good price; large battery capacity; nice design; decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/13/2017
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 505: Mid range graphics card integrated in the Snapdragon 430 and 435 SoCs. Based on the 500 generation and supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE, OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
435: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7) modem. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.20":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.ZTE:
ZTE is short for Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited, which was founded in China in 1985 and is partly state-owned. ZTE's core business is wireless, optical transmission, data transmission equipment, telecommunications software and cell phones, USB sticks, routers and tablets.
73.5%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.