LG X Venture
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix f/2.2, 1080p
Average of 4 scores (from 8 reviews)
Reviews for the LG X Venture
Overall, the LG X venture is a handset that is quite capable and is a good option for someone looking for a decent performer with lots of battery life. Sure, it doesn’t have the best camera or appearance, but it makes up for that in other ways. Perhaps the biggest draw for the device will be that it is certified MIL-STD 810G device and has an IP68 rating, giving the user a bit more freedom when it comes to being carefree. While it wasn’t abused during the course of the review, it was lightly tossed about more than normal and also submerged in water.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/18/2017
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Tom's Guide
Ideally, the X Venture would cost $50 to $75 less, which would make it more competitive when compared with budget phones like the $230 Moto G5 Plus. Even so, if you just want something simple, tough and affordable, the X Venture is a solid choice.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag
For $330, the LG X Venture gives you a good combination of durability, performance, and size. Compared with the brick-like Sonim XP6 and Cat S60, the X Venture is a svelte device that won't weigh down your pocket, but still offers solid protection. The Galaxy S7 Active is a more powerful phone all around, but it's also a lot more expensive. The Kyocera DuraForce Pro is our Editors' Choice in this price range thanks to its superior durability and more powerful hardware, but it still costs nearly $100 more, making the X Venture an attractive alternative if you're looking to spend less.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 06/30/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Talk Android
The LG X Venture isn’t a phone for everyone, but it’s also not supposed to be. If you positively need the latest and greatest, this phone likely won’t even be on your radar, but if you’re looking for something that’s well-rounded and doesn’t cost an arm and a leg, you might have a winner.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/19/2017
Source: ZDNet DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 06/27/2017
Rating: Total score: 83%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android IT→EN
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 07/14/2017
Rating: performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN
Positive: Decent hardware; nice performance; good GPS tracking chip. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 07/28/2017
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN
Positive: High autonomy; powerful hardware; waterproof; anti-shock and anti-explode; quick charging.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 07/15/2017
CommentQualcomm Adreno 505:
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
435: Lower mainstream octa-core ARM Cortex-A53 SoC clocked at up to 1.4 GHz and the Adreno 505 GPU, a DDR3L-1600 memory controller as well as an X9 LTE (Cat. 7) modem. » Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
This display is quite big for a smartphone but frequently used for smartphones.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
LG Electronics Inc. is a subsidiary of the LG Group. LG is the world's second-biggest maker of televisions and third-biggest maker of mobile phones. With its headquarters in South Korea, the company has 75 subsidiaries worldwide that design and manufacture televisions, home appliances, and telecommunications devices. LG is an international laptop manufacturer of medium size with few reviews.
After a few years, LG largely withdrew from the laptop sector. In the smartphone segment, LG is a medium-sized manufacturer (not among the Top 5 in 2015 and 2016).
77%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.