Asus VivoBook E12 E203NA-FD020T
Specifications
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the Asus VivoBook E12 E203NA-FD020T
Source: Laptop Mag
Archive.org versionThe Asus VivoBook E203NA looks pretty for a budget notebook, but its bland display, short battery life and inexcusably dark webcam make using it a chore.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 40%
Source: Trusted Reviews
Archive.org versionA price of less than £200 is always going to result in some compromises – but the E203NA’s long battery life and a decent typing experience make it a viable option for those needing a cheap, portable work machine.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2017
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 80% performance: 30% display: 50% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Ofertaman
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Compact size; light weight; low price; stylish design; long battery life; nice connectivity.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 04/25/2018
Source: Mi Mundo Gadget
ES→EN Archive.org versionPositive: Low price; compact size; light weight; elegant design; nice display; high autonomy; good connectivity. Negative: Only 2GB RAM and 32GB ROM.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/01/2018
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 500: Integrated low-end graphics adapter with DirectX 12 support, which can be found in some ULV SoCs from the Apollo Lake series.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Celeron N3350: An Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W). The Celeron N3350 is based on the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture that came to replace Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements. The CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the venerable Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 is in multi-thread loads; the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as the Intel Core i3-7130U.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
