Asus VivoBook L203NA
Specifications
Price comparison
Reviews for the Asus VivoBook L203NA
Source: PC Mag
Archive.org versionWindows 10 gives you access to powerful applications that Chrome OS can't match, but the VivoBook 11 can't run those programs well, so for most shoppers there's no reason not to go with a comparable Chromebook for a similar or even lower price. The Asus mini is certainly easy to slip into a bag or backpack, and it'll muddle through routine tasks, but it's not pleasant to use. Budget buyers can do better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/09/2021
Comment
Intel HD Graphics 500: Integrated low-end graphics adapter with DirectX 12 support, which can be found in some ULV SoCs from the Apollo Lake series.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
Celeron N3350: An Apollo Lake family, dual-core, ultra-low-power processor (SoC) that saw the light of day in 2016. Its two cores run at 1.1 GHz to 2.4 GHz; these are not Hyper-Threading-enabled meaning there are no additional threads. This chip has a fairly competent integrated graphics solution, the Intel HD Graphics 500, and eats very little (~6 W). The Celeron N3350 is based on the Goldmont CPU microarchitecture that came to replace Silvermont (2013), bringing with it several welcome improvements. The CPU is Secure Boot-compatible; technically, it will have no issue running 64-bit Windows 11. The average N3350 in our database is just as fast as the venerable Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 is in multi-thread loads; the two cores of this Celeron trail behind a single core of any half-decent CPU such as the Intel Core i3-7130U.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
