Qualcomm Adreno 510 vs Qualcomm Adreno 305 vs Qualcomm Adreno 530
Qualcomm Adreno 510 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 510 is a mobile graphics card for mid-range smartphones and tablets (mostly Android based). It is included in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and 652 SoCs and based on the Adreno 500 architecture (like the Adreno 520 in the S820, which should be fully compatible in software).
The GPU supports modern standards like Vulkan 1.0 (according to Wikipedia), OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE (3.2 in other sources), OpenCL 2.0 and DirectX 12 (FL 12.1 according to Wikipedia, 11.1 according to Qualcomm). Furthermore, the GPU supports Universal Bandwidth Compression (UBWC) to save memory bandwidth.
Compared the the faster Adreno 530, the 510 is currently produced in the older 28nm process (650 and 652) and should offer less ALUs. The clock speed is not disclosed.
Early benchmarks and performance ratings from Qualcomm position the GPU on a level with the old Adreno 330 (former high end GPU) in the Snapdragon 810. Therefore, it should be able to handle most Android games up to Full HD fluently.
Qualcomm Adreno 305 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 305 is an integrated graphics unit for smartphones and tablets that is used for mainstream SoCs of the Qualcomm Snapdragon 400- an S4 Plus-series (e. g. 8930AB , Samsung Galaxy Mega 6.3 ). The Adreno 305 usually only offers half of the performance of the the Adreno 320 and is only slightly ahead of the Mali-400 MP4. Very demanding Android games of 2013 may not run completely smooth, but simple titles like Angry Birds and the usual multimedia tasks are no problem.
Qualcomm Adreno 530 ► remove from comparison
The Qualcomm Adreno 530 is an integrated graphics card for (mostly Android based) smartphones and tablets . It was introduced in the last quarter of 2015 and is integrated in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 SoC. It supports OpenGL ES 3.1 and DirectX 11.1.
The GPU uses a still unknown amount of unified shaders clocked at up to 624 MHz. In 2015 it belongs to the fastest GPU for smartphones. Compared to the predecessor Adreno 430 , the 530 is especially faster in demanding benchmarks.
Qualcomm Adreno 510 Qualcomm Adreno 305 Qualcomm Adreno 530 Adreno 500 Series Architecture Adreno 500 Shared Memory yes yes yes API DirectX 12.1, OpenGL ES 3.2, Vulkan DirectX 9.0c, OpenGL ES 3.0 DirectX 11.1, OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP technology 14 nm 28 nm 14 nm Features OpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 12 (FL 12_1) OpenGL ES 3.1 AEP, OpenCL 2.0, Direct3D 11.1 (FL 11_1) Date of Announcement 15.12.2015 01.09.2012 15.12.2015 Pipelines 6 - unified Core Speed 450 MHz 624 MHz Link to Manufacturer Page www.qualcomm.com
Benchmarks 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Graphics
min: 21087 avg: 21766 median: 21533 (2%) max: 23175 Points
min: 3503 avg: 4146 median: 4210 (0%) max: 4402 Points
min: 24310 avg: 32869 median: 32997 (4%) max: 40761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Graphics
min: 1780 avg: 2534 median: 2429 (0%) max: 5435 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Graphics
min: 3035 avg: 4947 median: 5238.5 (1%) max: 5521 Points
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
min: 1381 avg: 1454 median: 1441.5 (6%) max: 1579 Points
209 Points (1%)
min: 2649 avg: 3348 median: 3425 (15%) max: 3806 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
min: 1354 avg: 1395 median: 1389.5 (3%) max: 1459 Points
173 Points (0%)
min: 3401 avg: 4503 median: 4661.5 (10%) max: 5006 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
971 Points (5%)
min: 2252 avg: 2605 median: 2594.5 (13%) max: 2893 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
867 Points (3%)
min: 2488 avg: 2996 median: 3108 (9%) max: 3253 Points
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
min: 7.1 avg: 8.4 median: 7.2 (1%) max: 11 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
min: 15 avg: 17.7 median: 19 (1%) max: 19 fps
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
min: 3.2 avg: 5.2 median: 5.4 (1%) max: 6 fps
min: 14 avg: 18.3 median: 19 (2%) max: 20 fps
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
min: 4.6 avg: 8.9 median: 9.5 (0%) max: 10 fps
min: 12 avg: 28.6 median: 31 (1%) max: 34.02 fps
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
min: 9.2 avg: 14.2 median: 14.5 (1%) max: 17 fps
min: 1.2 avg: 2 median: 1.7 (0%) max: 6.1 fps
min: 26 avg: 43 median: 44.5 (3%) max: 49 fps
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 510 GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
min: 22 avg: 30.8 median: 31 (0%) max: 36 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 305 min: 3.5 avg: 5.3 median: 5.7 (0%) max: 6.2 fps
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 530
min: 47.19 avg: 83.3 median: 88 (1%) max: 96 fps
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Off-screen
min: 756 avg: 1724 median: 1840 (64%) max: 2156 Points
AnTuTu 3DRating - Antutu 3DRating Score
min: 3291 avg: 3821 median: 3867.5 (34%) max: 4216 Points
AnTuTu v3 - AnTuTu v3 GPU
min: 4234 avg: 4944 median: 4983 (52%) max: 5498 Points
Basemark ES 2.0 - Basemark ES 2.0
44.8 fps (74%)
min: 13.58 avg: 35.6 median: 34.9 (58%) max: 48.99 fps
Basemark X 1.0 - Basemark X 1.0 Off-Screen
min: 2.265 avg: 2.7 median: 2.7 (13%) max: 3.092 fps
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 High Quality
15120 Points (34%)
min: 749 avg: 1438 median: 1433.5 (3%) max: 1878 Points
min: 21420 avg: 30602 median: 33028 (75%) max: 35449 Points
Basemark X 1.1 - Basemark X 1.1 Medium Quality
26078 Points (58%)
min: 3492 avg: 4252 median: 4267 (9%) max: 4725 Points
min: 28538 avg: 37215 median: 38353 (85%) max: 41500 Points
NenaMark2 - NenaMark2 Score
min: 54.3 avg: 58.5 median: 58.7 (87%) max: 64.6 fps
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
6078 Points (6%)
min: 1801 avg: 2413 median: 2406 (2%) max: 3026 Points
min: 4781 avg: 5512 median: 5612.5 (6%) max: 6042 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
2559 Points (4%)
min: 516 avg: 702 median: 705.5 (1%) max: 1008 Points
min: 1913 avg: 2183 median: 2178.5 (4%) max: 2461 Points
Smartbench 2012 - Smartbench 2012 Gaming Index
4270 Points (93%)
min: 1651 avg: 3146 median: 3132 (68%) max: 4046 Points
4410 Points (96%)
Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 100% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 305 → 24% n=10 Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 196% n=10
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation
Game Benchmarks The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.
88%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) [X] HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start 30 [X] HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
25 fps, max:
32 fps
30 30 30 [X] LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
56 58 59 [X] OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
59 60 [X] Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
50 fps, max:
61 fps
60 ~ 43 fps
100%
Adreno 510:
29 30 30 ~ 30 fps
107%
Adreno 530:
0 (!) [X] HTC U Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
Problem during benchmarking occured: game wont start 29 [X] Lenovo Moto Z Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
27 fps, max:
30 fps
29 29 30 [X] OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 30 [X] OnePlus 3T Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 30 [X] LG G6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
30 30 [X] ZTE Axon M Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro 2.4GHz
Adreno 530
48 [X] HTC 10 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
30 fps, max:
50 fps
~ 29 fps
Adreno 530:
35 [X] OnePlus 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 2.2GHz
Adreno 530
min:
28 fps, max:
42 fps
51 ~ 43 fps
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 510 → 100% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%
Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 305 → 79% Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 530 → 98% Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 88%
Qualcomm Adreno 510 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 49 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 27 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1
Qualcomm Adreno 530 low med. high ultra QHD 4K Dead Trigger 2 43 Asphalt 8: Airborne 30 29 Real Racing 3 60 43 < 30 fps < 60 fps < 120 fps ≥ 120 fps 1 1 1 2
For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List
v1.26
log 06. 03:27:41
#0 checking url part for id 7360 +0s ... 0s
#1 checking url part for id 3715 +0s ... 0s
#2 checking url part for id 7062 +0s ... 0s
#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s
#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:42:18 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s
#5 composed specs +0.136s ... 0.137s
#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.137s
#7 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.137s
#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 7360 +0.041s ... 0.177s
#9 got single benchmarks 7360 +0.044s ... 0.221s
#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 3715 +0.002s ... 0.223s
#11 got single benchmarks 3715 +0.109s ... 0.331s
#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 7062 +0.002s ... 0.333s
#13 got single benchmarks 7062 +0.068s ... 0.4s
#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.4s
#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.042s ... 0.443s
#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.014s ... 0.457s
#17 min, max, avg, median took s +0.109s ... 0.566s
#18 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.566s
#19 Got 66 rows for game benchmarks. +0.086s ... 0.653s
#20 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.653s
#21 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.004s ... 0.657s
#22 benchmarks composed for output. +0.023s ... 0.68s
#23 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.68s
#24 return log +0.002s ... 0.682s
Please share our article, every link counts!
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)