Notebookcheck Logo

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ Notebook Review

Cheap DTR.The Aspire E5-774 works very quietly, barely heats up, offers simple upgrade options, an FHD screen and good battery life - a nice desktop replacement. The price is relatively low at 550 Euros (~$583), but the laptop does not come with a Windows OS.

For the original German review, see here.

The Aspire E5-774 is a 17.3-inch office notebook, which has the same build as its sister model, the Aspire E5-774G. The latter has a dedicated GPU, whereas our test model relies only on an integrated graphics chip. The Aspire runs on a Kaby Lake processor and the competition includes laptops such as the Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK, the Toshiba Satellite C70-C and the Acer Aspire ES1-731G.

Since the E5-774 and the E5-774G have the same build, we will not discuss the case, the connectivity, the input devices, the display and the speakers any further. This information can be found in the recent review of the Aspire E5-774G.

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (Aspire E5 Series)
Processor
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Graphics adapter
Intel HD Graphics 620, Core: 1000 MHz, Single-Channel, 21.20.16.4494
Memory
4 GB 
, DDR4-2400, Single-Channel, two memory slots (one occupied)
Display
17.30 inch 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, TN LED, glossy: no
Mainboard
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Storage
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, 500 GB 
, 5400 rpm, 465 GB free
Soundcard
Realtek ALC255 @ Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y - High Definition Audio Controller
Connections
2 USB 2.0, 3 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: Audio combo, Card Reader: SD, TPM 2.0
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0
Optical drive
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE1N
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 28 x 423 x 282 ( = 1.1 x 16.65 x 11.1 in)
Battery
41 Wh Lithium-Ion
Operating System
FreeDos
Camera
Webcam: HD
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo, Keyboard: Chiclet, Keyboard Light: no, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
3 kg ( = 105.82 oz / 6.61 pounds), Power Supply: 340 g ( = 11.99 oz / 0.75 pounds)
Price
549 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Which OS?

Our test model comes with a pre-installed copy of FreeDos. Most users will replace this installation with a Windows OS and Windows 10 is the most likely candidate, as Microsoft will not be providing Windows 7/8 support for the Kaby Lake generation. So if you are looking to install Windows 7/8, you need to rely on Intel, as they (partially) provide drivers for Windows 7/8. We tried out a Windows 7 installation on our test model.

For the first step, we added an AHCI driver of the Kaby Lake generation to the Windows 7 installation. Without this driver, the controller of the notebook cannot be recognized and by extension, neither can the hard disk. An installation would not be possible in this case. The driver can be found on the Intel website. We used the "NTLite" tool for integration. After finishing the Windows 7 installation, we found many unrecognized devices in the device manager. The installation of the chipset and the USB 3.0 drivers reduced this number significantly. Next, we installed the WLAN module using the driver provided by Acer (for Windows 7/8/10).

After finishing these tasks, we turned our attention to Windows Update, to ensure that the system had the latest updates. Sadly, no drivers were found for the hardware of the laptop. This was surprising. It is understandable that the system could not find a driver for Kaby Lake. However, it also failed to find a single driver for the common Gigabit Ethernet chip from Realtek. This chip has been on the market for years and is normally recognized and installed by Windows Update. We suspect Windows will not provide any driver support, as soon as they recognize the system is running a Kaby Lake processor on an older Windows OS. The appropriate Ethernet chip driver can be found on the Realtek website.

We finished our Windows 7 installation off by checking the functionality of the integrated graphics chip. So far, the HD Graphics 620 drivers Intel has released have all been for Windows 10 (see Readme files). Sadly, we can only use the Windows 7/8 drivers for Skylake GPUs to install our graphics chip. We hope Intel will add an appropriate Windows 7 driver to their catalog soon.

A Windows 7 driver for Kaby Lake GPUs ...
A Windows 7 driver for Kaby Lake GPUs ...
... is not provided by Intel.
... is not provided by Intel.

Linux is a clear alternative to Windows. We tested the 16.10 distribution of Ubuntu on our test model. Surprise: all hardware was recognized and installed correctly (including the WLAN module and the Ethernet chip). In fact, we were able to use the function keys (volume rocker, brightness adjustment) right away after the installation.

Ubuntu 16.10 runs perfectly.
Ubuntu 16.10 runs perfectly.
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
 
72.7 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
 
44 MB/s -39%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
 
40.3 MB/s -45%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
 
18 MB/s -75%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
 
14.3 MB/s -80%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
 
87.3 MB/s
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
 
85.5 MB/s -2%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
 
80.5 MB/s -8%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
 
26.7 MB/s -69%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
 
25.2 MB/s -71%
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
341 MBit/s
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
331 MBit/s -3%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
327 MBit/s +7%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (jseb)
307 MBit/s

Display

Pixel grid
Pixel grid

The Aspire uses the same matte FHD screen, as its sister model, the Aspire E5-774G. As such, our measurements have remained mostly the same. However, there are slight deviations, as no two panels are exactly the same. Our test model has a bright display with good contrast and color space coverage.

327
cd/m²
330
cd/m²
306
cd/m²
323
cd/m²
353
cd/m²
293
cd/m²
319
cd/m²
338
cd/m²
289
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
AU Optronics B173HTN01.1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Maximum: 353 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 319.8 cd/m² Minimum: 25.6 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 82 %
Center on Battery: 353 cd/m²
Contrast: 929:1 (Black: 0.38 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.94
ΔE Greyscale 13.38 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
71.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.69
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3"
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
TN LED, 1600x900, 17.3"
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Display
2%
-21%
-17%
-2%
Display P3 Coverage
71.3
72.3
1%
52.4
-27%
54.5
-24%
69.3
-3%
sRGB Coverage
91.7
94.8
3%
76.1
-17%
81.8
-11%
90.6
-1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
67.1
69.3
3%
54.2
-19%
56.1
-16%
66.3
-1%
Response Times
1%
-2%
-5%
-63%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
42 ?(21, 21)
43 ?(23, 20)
-2%
42 ?(22, 30)
-0%
48 ?(25, 23)
-14%
86 ?(44, 42)
-105%
Response Time Black / White *
23 ?(6, 17)
22 ?(5, 17)
4%
24 ?(7, 17)
-4%
24 ?(8, 16)
-4%
24 ?(7, 17)
-4%
PWM Frequency
1000 ?(90)
1000 ?(90)
0%
1042 ?(90)
4%
200 ?(90)
-80%
Screen
-7%
-33%
-26%
-15%
Brightness middle
353
320
-9%
205
-42%
216
-39%
304
-14%
Brightness
320
302
-6%
182
-43%
199
-38%
292
-9%
Brightness Distribution
82
86
5%
77
-6%
80
-2%
84
2%
Black Level *
0.38
0.4
-5%
0.43
-13%
0.17
55%
0.37
3%
Contrast
929
800
-14%
477
-49%
1271
37%
822
-12%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
5.07
7.78
-53%
9.75
-92%
12.2
-141%
10.62
-109%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
10.12
12.74
-26%
16.02
-58%
20.4
-102%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
13.38
8.87
34%
12.09
10%
13.3
1%
11.78
12%
Gamma
2.69 82%
2.27 97%
2.62 84%
2.15 102%
2.39 92%
CCT
15991 41%
8979 72%
12875 50%
15963 41%
12997 50%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
60.1
62
3%
49
-18%
52
-13%
59
-2%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
91.6
95
4%
76
-17%
76
-17%
90
-2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-1% / -4%
-19% / -26%
-16% / -20%
-27% / -22%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 1000 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 17204 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 3846000) Hz was measured.

CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Color Checker
CalMAN - Grey Levels
CalMAN - Grey Levels
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Saturation
CalMAN - Color Checker (calibrated)
CalMAN - Color Checker (calibrated)
CalMAN - Grey Levels (calibrated)
CalMAN - Grey Levels (calibrated)
CalMAN - Saturation (calibrated)
CalMAN - Saturation (calibrated)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 6 ms rise
↘ 17 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21.1 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
42 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 21 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (33.1 ms).

Performance

The Acer Aspire E5-774 is a 17.3-inch office notebook, which means that it offers sufficient performance for everyday use. Our test model is available for around 550 Euros (~$583) and other configuration are available. There are also models (see Aspire E5-774G) with a dedicated GPU.

Processor

The Core i5-7200U (Kaby Lake) dual-core CPU is the heart of our test model. This is the latest Intel ULV processor (TDP: 15 W). This CPU should suffice most users and operates at a base clock speed of 2.5 GHz. Turbo allows it to jump up to 3.1 GHz (both cores) and this boost is available on battery as well.

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4993
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
11410
Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
7530
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
328 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
34.48 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Help
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
131 Points +2%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
118 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
106 Points -18%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
45 Points -65%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
330 Points +1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
328 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
292 Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
292 Points -11%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD A6-7310
159 Points -52%
Geekbench 3
32 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
3266 Points +15%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
2852 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
2782 Points -2%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
2396 Points -16%
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
6847 Points +8%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
6338 Points
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
5993 Points -5%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
5569 Points -12%
Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
3502 Points
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
6447 Points
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Intel Core i7-6500U
216.8 Points +3%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel Core i5-7200U
211.5 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Intel Core i5-6200U
192.6 Points -9%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Intel Core i5-6200U
186.9 Points -12%

System Performance

Our test model has no Windows installation. Therefore, in order to run our tests, we chose to install Windows 10 Pro (64-bit). The system ran smoothly and we did not encounter any issues. The PC Mark benchmark results are quite good, but the system performance can be increased further by swapping out the storage device for an SSD. This will allow the system to run faster (boot times, loading programs). The HDD can stay in as the notebook has a free M.2 slot (2240, 2260, 2280). It is possible to further increase the performance by adding a second RAM module. This addition would increase the graphics performance.

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
2854 points
Help
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
GeForce 940MX, 6500U, Lite-On CV1-8B256
3734 Points +31%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Radeon R5 M335, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3232 Points +13%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Radeon R5 M330, 6200U, Toshiba MQ01ABD100
3184 Points +12%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
2854 Points
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A6-7310, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
1855 Points -35%

Storage Device

The system drive is a 2.5-inch Western Digital HDD. It operates at 5400 RPM and offers a capacity of 500 GB. The transfer speeds of the HDD are normal for a 5400 RPM drive. The Aspire has a free M.2 slot which will accommodate appropriate SSDs.

Swapping the HDD is possible.
Swapping the HDD is possible.
The Aspire can use M.2 SSDs (2240, 2260, 2280).
The Aspire can use M.2 SSDs (2240, 2260, 2280).
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Transfer Rate Minimum: 48.7 MB/s
Transfer Rate Maximum: 118.3 MB/s
Transfer Rate Average: 90.5 MB/s
Access Time: 18.5 ms
Burst Rate: 237.3 MB/s
CPU Usage: 8.3 %
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Lite-On CV1-8B256
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
Toshiba MQ01ABD100
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
9156%
-10%
18%
-22%
Read Seq
88.9
520
485%
100.6
13%
113.9
28%
91.8
3%
Write Seq
70.9
332.8
369%
96.3
36%
113.8
61%
84.7
19%
Read 512
33.01
382.8
1060%
28.15
-15%
37.29
13%
26.59
-19%
Write 512
51.6
357.7
593%
43.34
-16%
51.8
0%
32.7
-37%
Read 4k
0.381
32.31
8380%
0.312
-18%
0.425
12%
0.288
-24%
Write 4k
1.117
85.1
7519%
0.792
-29%
1.153
3%
0.638
-43%
Read 4k QD32
0.891
277.7
31067%
0.708
-21%
1.095
23%
0.59
-34%
Write 4k QD32
1.13
269.8
23776%
0.764
-32%
1.162
3%
0.642
-43%

Graphics Card

The Intel HD Graphics 620 graphics chip supports DirectX 12 and works at speeds of up to 1000 MHz. The results of the 3D Mark benchmark place the chip at the expected level. A second RAM module would activate dual-channel mode and increase the graphics performance.

3DMark 11 Performance
1413 points
Help
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
2813 Points +111%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
AMD Radeon R5 M335, Intel Core i5-6200U
1784 Points +34%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1555 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
1518 Points +14%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
1331 Points
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
AMD Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), AMD A6-7310
764 Points -43%

Gaming Performance

The test model runs many games smoothly. However, it is best-suited for games with modest requirements. These games are best run with low resolutions and details to reach a smooth FPS. A second RAM module would increase the performance (=Dual-Channel mode active). Power hungry games, such as “Mafia 3”, are not going to run well on this notebook, as they need higher performance.

low med. high ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 35.6 20.1 16.6 5.4
BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i7-6500U
116.4 fps +227%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
52.3 fps +47%
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
AMD Radeon R5 M335, Intel Core i5-6200U
44.9 fps +26%
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
AMD Radeon R5 M330, Intel Core i5-6200U
43.2 fps +21%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-7200U
35.6 fps

Emissions and Energy

Fan noise.
Fan noise.

System Noise

The Aspire barely makes any noise. While idle, the fan is often off and we could hear the HDD running. If you swap the HDD for an SSD, you could even have a silent laptop. Under load, the fan barely turns up. We measured a maximum emission of 33.8 dB(A), which is very good. Unfortunately, the fan emits a whirring noise.

Noise Level

Idle
30.8 / 30.8 / 30.8 dB(A)
HDD
32.4 dB(A)
DVD
35.6 / dB(A)
Load
32.1 / 33.8 dB(A)
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silent
40 dB(A)
audible
50 dB(A)
loud
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm distance)   environment noise: 30.5 dB(A)

Temperature

Stress test.
Stress test.

Our stress test (Prime95 and FurMark run simultaneously for at least an hour) runs the same way on the Aspire whether it is on battery or plugged in. The CPU runs at 3.1 GHz and the integrated graphics chip operates at 1000 MHz. The laptop barely heats up: during our stress test, we measured two points at which the laptop exceeds the 30 degrees Celsius (~86 degrees Fahrenheit) mark.

Max. Load
 29 °C
84 F
27.4 °C
81 F
24.6 °C
76 F
 
 29.3 °C
85 F
30.4 °C
87 F
24.3 °C
76 F
 
 28.2 °C
83 F
28.8 °C
84 F
24.9 °C
77 F
 
Maximum: 30.4 °C = 87 F
Average: 27.4 °C = 81 F
23.2 °C
74 F
26 °C
79 F
28.7 °C
84 F
23 °C
73 F
24.5 °C
76 F
30.6 °C
87 F
25 °C
77 F
25.2 °C
77 F
28.2 °C
83 F
Maximum: 30.6 °C = 87 F
Average: 26 °C = 79 F
Power Supply (max.)  35.8 °C = 96 F | Room Temperature 21.8 °C = 71 F | FIRT 550-Pocket
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 30.4 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.9 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.1 °C / -1.9 F).
Heat emissions above (load)
Heat emissions above (load)
Heat emissions below (load)
Heat emissions below (load)
Heat emissions above (idle)
Heat emissions above (idle)
Heat emissions below (idle)
Heat emissions below (idle)
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2034.134.634.12530.539.630.53137.139.937.14030.635.230.6503032.3306328.628.228.68029.42629.410031263112529.125.429.116030.623.330.620038.423.838.42505122.75131554.821.654.840059.820.259.850056.419.656.463064.518.664.580067.918.667.9100068.41868.4125057.117.457.1160056.717.956.7200063.617.563.6250064.117.864.1315068.617.968.6400070.41870.4500068.818.368.8630067.118.467.1800067.118.467.11000073.318.473.31250076.618.276.61600081.318.481.3SPL80.730.580.7N44.81.444.8median 64.1median 18.4median 64.1Delta8.61.18.635.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseAcer Aspire E5-774-54HJApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Frequency diagram for comparison (checkboxes above can be selected!)

Power Consumption

While idle, we measure a consumption rate of 10.5 watts, which is a normal value for a 17.3-inch notebook. During our stress test, this number rose to 37 watts (max.). CPU and GPU work at full speed and the power adapter is adequately scoped with a capacity of 65 watts.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.6 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 5.3 / 10.1 / 10.5 Watt
Load midlight 34.3 / 37 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Currently we use the Metrahit Energy, a professional single phase power quality and energy measurement digital multimeter, for our measurements. Find out more about it here. All of our test methods can be found here.

Battery Life

In our WLAN test, we simulate the load when surfing various websites. The power profile is set to "Balanced" and the power saver functions of the laptop are turned off. The brightness is regulated to around 150 cd/m². The laptop runs for 5:20 hours, which is quite good for a 17.3-inch notebook.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 38)
5h 20min
Battery Runtime - WiFi Websurfing
Lenovo IdeaPad 300-17ISK 80QH001EGE
6200U, Radeon R5 M330, 41 Wh
406 min +27%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
6500U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
322 min +1%
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh
320 min
Dell Inspiron 17 5759-5118
6200U, Radeon R5 M335, 40 Wh
301 min -6%
Acer Aspire E5-722-662J
A6-7310, Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), 37 Wh
228 min -29%

Pros

+ matte panel
+ FHD resolution
+ free M.2 slot
+ good battery life
+ maintenance flap
+ ac WLAN
+ Type-C USB (USB 3.1 Gen 1)

Cons

- positioning of ports

Verdict

In review: Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ. Test model provided by Cyberport.de
In review: Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ. Test model provided by Cyberport.de

The Core i5 processor of the Kaby Lake generation offers sufficient performance for everyday tasks and the integrated graphics chip will run a lot of games (with modest requirements). We recommend installing a second RAM module to increase the system and graphics performance. The laptop is quiet and barely heats up. The storage space of 500 GB is quite good, but we recommend installing an M.2 SSD in the empty slot of the notebook. Thanks to the maintenance flap, the user will be able to perform this operation easily. The keyboard of the laptop is quite good and the battery life is decent for a 17.3-inch model. The matte, bright FHD panel has strong contrast, but suffers from poor viewing angles since it is a TN panel. However, this is one of the better TN panels available, which means that at least it has wider viewing angles than a cheaper, standard TN screen. Sadly, it will not be able to compete with an IPS panel.

The Aspire E5-774 is a well-designed notebook for home office use. 

If you like this laptop, but want more graphics performance, we would advise you to take a look at the Aspire E5-774G. The E5-774G offers a dedicated GeForce 940MX GPU with GDDR5 memory. This combination will produce 20-30% higher frame rates than a notebook with a GeForce 940MX and GDDR3 memory.

Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ - 11/20/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sascha Mölck

Chassis
79 / 98 → 80%
Keyboard
74%
Pointing Device
84%
Connectivity
49 / 80 → 61%
Weight
57 / 20-67 → 79%
Battery
84%
Display
83%
Games Performance
53 / 68 → 78%
Application Performance
72 / 92 → 78%
Temperature
96%
Noise
93%
Audio
54%
Camera
25 / 85 → 29%
Average
69%
80%
Office - Weighted Average

Price comparison

Read all 2 comments / answer
static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Sascha Mölck, 2016-11-28 (Update: 2018-05-15)