Notebookcheck Logo

AMD A10-8700P vs AMD PRO A8-9600B vs AMD A12-9700P

AMD A10-8700P

► remove from comparison AMD A10-8700P

The AMD A10-8700P is a mid-range Carrizo APU of 2015 for mainstream laptops. It is a SoC containing two Excavator CPU modules (with 4 integer and 2 FP units counted as 4 compute cores), a Radeon R7 graphics card with 6 compute cores (384 shaders), a DDR3-2133 (35 Watt cTDP) memory controller and a video engine (including UVD 6 with hardware HEVC / H.265 decoding).

The performances of the CPU and GPU cores depend on the configurable TDP. This cTDP can range from 12 to 35 Watts depending on the cooling solution and size of the laptop. Thus, clock speeds of the compute cores will vary. E.g., the GPU can score between 1764 points (15 Watts) to 2359 points (+34% with 35 Watt cTDP) in 3DMark 11 (P). CPU performance with a 35 Watt cTDP should be slightly above the Kaveri A10-7400P. If configured at 15 Watts, the CPU should be clearly slower as the Boost speed cannot be maintained for extended periods.

More technical details and features of the 6th generation of APUs (Carrizo) can be found in our launch article.

AMD PRO A8-9600B

► remove from comparison AMD A8-9600B

The AMD PRO A8-9600B is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.4 - 3.3 GHz. It is intended for business laptops and features the same specifications as the consumer AMD A10-9600P SoC.

It was announced in mid 2016 and is based on the same silicon as Carrizo but with more and refined features. It is a ULV-chip with a TDP of 15 Watt and integrates a Radeon R5 graphics card (384 shader cores / 6 compute cores) and a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. As Carrizo its a full featured SoC that offers all I/O ports on the chip.

The A10-9600P is slightly faster than the old 15-Watt top model of Carrizo, the FX-8800P. Therefore, the CPU performance is similar to a Broadwell 15 Watt Core i3 like The i3-5010U. See our Bristol Ridge article for more information on the architecture and improvements compared to Carrizo.

AMD A12-9700P

► remove from comparison AMD A12-9700P

The AMD A12-9700P is a mainstream SoC from the Bristol-Ridge APU series for notebooks (7th APU generation), which was announced mid 2016. The ULV chip with a TDP of 15 Watts (can be configured to 12 Watts) has four CPU cores (two Excavator modules), a Radeon R7 GPU as well as a dual-channel DDR4-1866 memory controller. Carrizo is a full-fledged SoC and is also equipped with an integrated chipset, which provides all I/0 ports.

Architecture

Bristol Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 1866 MHz. More technical details are available in the following articles:

Performance

The performance of the A12-9700P is between the two 15-Watt processors A10-9600P and FX-9800P, and therefore roughly on par with a 15-Watt Core i3 from the Skylake or Kaby Lake series, respectively. Compared to the Intel model, the AMD chip has a small advantage in multi-thread scenarios, but is beaten when you only stress one or two cores. Due to the TDP limitation, the performance of the A12-9700P will drop significantly under sustained workloads.

This means there is sufficient performance for typical office and web applications as well as light multitasking.

Graphics Card

The integrated Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) GPU has 512 active shader units (8 compute cores) clocked at up to 758 MHz. Thanks to the better utilization of the clock range as well as faster DDR4-RAm, the GPU can slightly beat its predecessors Radeon R7 (Carrizo) and competes with a dedicated GeForce 920MX in the best-case scenario (dual-channel memory, low CPU requirements). Many games from 2015/2016 can be played smoothly at low settings. 

Power Consumption

AMD specifies the TDP of the A12-9700P with 15 Watts, which is comparable to Intel's ULV models. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin notebooks starting with a 12-inch screen.

ModelAMD A10-8700PAMD PRO A8-9600BAMD A12-9700P
CodenameCarrizoBristol RidgeBristol Ridge
SeriesAMD CarrizoAMD Bristol RidgeAMD Bristol Ridge
Series: Bristol Ridge Bristol Ridge
AMD FX-8800P2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A12-8800B2.1 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-8700P « 1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A10-8700B1.8 - 3.2 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A8-8600P1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD Pro A8-8600B1.6 - 3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A6-8500P1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD Pro A6-8500B1.6 - 3 GHz2 / 2 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B « 2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9830P3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9830B3 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD FX-9800P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A12-9800B2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9720P2.7 - 3.6 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A12-9700P « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9620P2.5 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD A10-9600P2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
AMD PRO A8-9600B2.4 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores
Clock1800 - 3200 MHz2400 - 3300 MHz2500 - 3400 MHz
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 44 / 44 / 4
TDP15 Watt15 Watt15 Watt
Transistors3100 Million3100 Million3100 Million
Technology28 nm28 nm28 nm
SocketFP4 BGAFP4FP4
FeaturesHSA 1.0Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8Dual-Channel DDR3/DDR4-1866 Memory Controller, PCIe 3.0 x8
iGPUAMD Radeon R6 (Carrizo) ( - 800 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 720 MHz)AMD Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge) ( - 758 MHz)
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Manufacturerproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.comproducts.amd.com
Die Size250 mm2250 mm2
max. Temp.90 °C90 °C

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 175     avg: 190.1     median: 194 (1%)     max: 198 Points
203 Points (1%)
min: 222     avg: 225.5     median: 225.5 (1%)     max: 229 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 59     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (19%)     max: 75 Points
71 Points (20%)
min: 78     avg: 79     median: 79 (22%)     max: 80 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.12     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.36 Points
2.4 Points (3%)
min: 1.92     avg: 2.3     median: 2.3 (3%)     max: 2.62 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.68     avg: 0.8     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.89 Points
0.8 Points (20%)
min: 0.76     avg: 0.9     median: 0.9 (20%)     max: 0.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 2170     avg: 2294     median: 2334 (14%)     max: 2389 Points
2336 Points (14%)
min: 2262     avg: 2429     median: 2429 (15%)     max: 2596 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 4808     avg: 6140     median: 6394 (5%)     max: 6443 Points
5703 Points (4%)
min: 5148     avg: 6168     median: 6168 (4%)     max: 7188 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 8279     avg: 8769     median: 8924.5 (6%)     max: 8949 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 3080     avg: 3212     median: 3251.5 (4%)     max: 3264 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 507     avg: 536     median: 509 (6%)     max: 591 s
577 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 16.56     avg: 17.1     median: 17.2 (3%)     max: 17.47 s
16.8 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1293     avg: 1316     median: 1328 (2%)     max: 1328 Points
1444 Points (2%)
1462 Points (2%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 15     avg: 15.1     median: 15.1 (5%)     max: 15.23 fps
13.3 fps (4%)
16.7 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 72.2     avg: 73.5     median: 73.7 (17%)     max: 74.4 fps
70 fps (16%)
84.6 fps (20%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.18     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (5%)     max: 0.188 GB/s
0.2 GB/s (6%)
0.2 GB/s (7%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.28     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (5%)     max: 0.303 GB/s
0.3 GB/s (5%)
0.4 GB/s (6%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 1.4     avg: 1.5     median: 1.5 (4%)     max: 1.5 GB/s
1.5 GB/s (4%)
1.8 GB/s (5%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2776     avg: 2985     median: 2977.5 (6%)     max: 3186 Points
2930 Points (6%)
min: 3344     avg: 3498     median: 3498 (7%)     max: 3652 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 19.91     avg: 20.6     median: 20.5 (4%)     max: 22.25 s
19.5 s (4%)
19.2 s (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 44.38     avg: 46.1     median: 44.8 (2%)     max: 50.4 s
43.7 s (2%)
42.1 s (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 954     avg: 984     median: 964 (4%)     max: 1072 s
1000 s (4%)
980 s (4%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 6309     avg: 6653     median: 6586 (5%)     max: 7129 Points
7608 Points (6%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 1794     avg: 2134     median: 2150.5 (5%)     max: 2310 Points
2081 Points (5%)
min: 2524     avg: 2527     median: 2527 (6%)     max: 2530 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 13862     avg: 19941     median: 20873.5 (17%)     max: 22998 Points
21428 Points (17%)
25886 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 13248     avg: 20904     median: 21997.5 (18%)     max: 23111 Points
23396 Points (19%)
25743 Points (21%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 21515     avg: 23082     median: 23204 (19%)     max: 24168 Points
24627 Points (20%)
27373 Points (23%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 1774     avg: 1897     median: 1903 (5%)     max: 2007 Points
2071 Points (5%)
min: 2283     avg: 2306     median: 2306 (6%)     max: 2329 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 2456     avg: 2673     median: 2685 (5%)     max: 2803 Points
2427 Points (4%)
min: 2981     avg: 3125     median: 3124.5 (6%)     max: 3268 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1069 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2139 Points (21%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
4506 Points (4%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
1991 Points (22%)
2158 Points (24%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
4389 Points (6%)
4899 Points (7%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4550     avg: 4670     median: 4676.5 (8%)     max: 4775 Points
4764 Points (8%)
min: 5371     avg: 5464     median: 5464 (10%)     max: 5557 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 1941     avg: 1974     median: 1975 (39%)     max: 2006 Points
1965 Points (38%)
min: 2062     avg: 2091     median: 2091 (41%)     max: 2120 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 4832     avg: 5014     median: 5105 (8%)     max: 5105 Points
5002 Points (8%)
5824 Points (9%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 2065     avg: 2135     median: 2170 (32%)     max: 2170 Points
2102 Points (31%)
2308 Points (35%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4436 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
3385 Points (31%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
5779 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
5660 Points (11%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
5124 Points (13%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2229     avg: 2673     median: 2285.5 (3%)     max: 3488 ms
2552 ms (3%)
2059 ms (2%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 154     avg: 203     median: 164.3 (2%)     max: 363.6 ms
177.7 ms (2%)
164.9 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 8324     avg: 11931     median: 11800 (9%)     max: 15801 Points
15170 Points (11%)
19404 Points (15%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
31.9 Watt (6%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
33.3 Watt (6%)

Average Benchmarks AMD A10-8700P → 100% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD PRO A8-9600B → 101% n=29

Average Benchmarks AMD A12-9700P → 113% n=29

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.33
log 30. 15:49:53

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6845 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 9948 +0s ... 0s

#3 checking url part for id 8166 +0s ... 0s

#4 redirected to Ajax server, took 1751291393s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#5 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 28 Jun 2025 05:20:10 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#6 composed specs +0.007s ... 0.007s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 6845 +0.001s ... 0.008s

#9 got single benchmarks 6845 +0.011s ... 0.019s

#10 getting avg benchmarks for device 9948 +0.001s ... 0.02s

#11 got single benchmarks 9948 +0.004s ... 0.024s

#12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8166 +0.001s ... 0.024s

#13 got single benchmarks 8166 +0.006s ... 0.03s

#14 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.03s

#15 min, max, avg, median took s +0.046s ... 0.076s

#16 return log +0s ... 0.076s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)