Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i7-4790 vs Intel Core i7-6700

Intel Core i7-4790

► remove from comparison Intel 4790

The Intel Core i7-4790 is a high end quad-core desktop processor using the Haswell architecture. It clocks at 3.6 - 4 GHz and can run 8 threads at once thanks to HyperThreading. Compared to the similar named Core i7-4790K, the 4790 clocks a bit lower and offers no open multiplier for overclocking. The TDP is rated at 84 Watt and therefore suited for Desktop-PCs and large laptops.

Intel Core i7-6700

► remove from comparison Intel 6700

The Intel Core i7-6700 is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 3.4 up to 4.0 GHz (2 cores: 3.9 GHz, 4 cores: 3.7 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Contrary to the Core i7-6700K, the i7-6700 does not have a free multiplier and can hardly be overclocked. 

Architecture

Intel uses Skylake to replace both Broadwell and Haswell and therefore once again uses one core design for all TDP classes. Several improvements of the Skylake architecture include bigger Out-to-Order-Buffer, optimizations for pre-fetching as well as bigger gains by Hyperthreading. However, the changes are small for a "Tock" – a new micro architecture – in general, so the per-MHz performance is only between 5-10 % (compared to Haswell) or less than 5 % higher (compared to Broadwell), respectively.

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700 has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790 (3.6 GHz - 4.0 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Another 7 % faster is the top model i7-6700K. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 65 Watts.

ModelIntel Core i7-4790Intel Core i7-6700
CodenameHaswellSkylake
SeriesIntel Core i7 (Desktop)Intel Core i7 (Desktop)
Series: Core i7 (Desktop) Skylake
Intel Core i7-4790K compare4 - 4.4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4790 « 3.6 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4770K compare3.5 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4790S compare3.2 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-4790T compare2.7 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700K compare4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700 « 3.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T compare2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock3600 - 4000 MHz3400 - 4000 MHz
L1 Cache256 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1 MB1 MB
L3 Cache8 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads4 / 84 / 8
TDP84 Watt65 Watt
Transistors1400 Million
Technology22 nm14 nm
Die Size177 mm2
SocketFCLGA1150FCLGA1151
FeaturesHD Graphics 4600 (350 - 1200 MHz), DDR3-1600 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vProDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 4600 (350 - 1200 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$303 U.S.$303 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
4790 +
765 Points (5%)
105%
6700 +
min: 743     avg: 791     median: 802 (5%)     max: 817 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
4790 +
min: 158     avg: 158.5     median: 158.5 (44%)     max: 159 Points
106%
6700 +
min: 117     avg: 156.3     median: 168.5 (47%)     max: 171 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
4790 +
min: 8.26     avg: 8.3     median: 8.3 (11%)     max: 8.32 Points
107%
6700 +
min: 8.69     avg: 8.8     median: 8.9 (11%)     max: 8.94 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
4790 +
min: 1.78     avg: 1.8     median: 1.8 (42%)     max: 1.79 Points
108%
6700 +
min: 1.89     avg: 1.9     median: 1.9 (46%)     max: 1.94 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
4790 +
5926 Points (36%)
101%
6700 +
min: 5634     avg: 6003     median: 6002.5 (36%)     max: 6371 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
4790 +
22667 Points (16%)
107%
6700 +
min: 24237     avg: 24305     median: 24304.5 (18%)     max: 24372 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
4790 +
29580 Points (19%)
106%
6700 +
31339 Points (20%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
4790 +
7878 Points (10%)
104%
6700 +
8213 Points (10%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
4790 +
197.6 s (2%)
209 s (2%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
4790 +
6.4 s (1%)
6.8 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 6700 +
min: 5323     avg: 5413     median: 5412.5 (9%)     max: 5502 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
4790 +
46 fps (15%)
110%
6700 +
50.8 fps (17%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
4790 +
171 fps (39%)
110%
6700 +
187.4 fps (43%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 6700 +
min: 0.46     avg: 0.5     median: 0.5 (14%)     max: 0.465 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 6700 +
min: 0.77     avg: 0.8     median: 0.8 (13%)     max: 0.781 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 6700 +
min: 4.4     avg: 4.5     median: 4.5 (12%)     max: 4.5 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 6700 +
min: 8199     avg: 8403     median: 8478 (18%)     max: 8532 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
4790 +
9.1 s (2%)
min: 9.3     avg: 9.7     median: 9.7 (2%)     max: 10 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
4790 +
20.5 s (1%)
min: 20.8     avg: 22.4     median: 22.4 (1%)     max: 24 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
4790 +
495.9 s (2%)
min: 490.8     avg: 537     median: 536.9 (2%)     max: 583 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
100%
1 6700 +
155890 MIPS (74%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
100%
1 6700 +
83810 MFLOPS (64%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 6700 +
min: 28021     avg: 28924     median: 28924 (22%)     max: 29827 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
4790 +
min: 9030     avg: 9133     median: 9133 (22%)     max: 9236 Points
108%
6700 +
min: 8405     avg: 9780     median: 9832 (24%)     max: 10416 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
4790 +
min: 51849     avg: 51905     median: 51904.5 (42%)     max: 51960 Points
106%
6700 +
min: 52447     avg: 54281     median: 54997 (45%)     max: 55398 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
4790 +
min: 7553     avg: 7570     median: 7570 (19%)     max: 7587 Points
105%
6700 +
min: 7879     avg: 8131     median: 7952 (20%)     max: 8561 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
4790 +
min: 10685     avg: 10707     median: 10706.5 (19%)     max: 10728 Points
106%
6700 +
min: 10918     avg: 11399     median: 11385 (20%)     max: 11819 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
100%
1 6700 +
4535 Points (19%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700 +
min: 15038     avg: 15053     median: 15053 (27%)     max: 15068 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700 +
min: 4022     avg: 4031     median: 4030.5 (79%)     max: 4039 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700 +
15812 Points (25%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700 +
4233 Points (63%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 6700 +
812 ms (1%)
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6700 +
67.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6700 +
44474 Points (34%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-4790 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700 → 103% n=19

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 29. 14:00:07

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 6772 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 7101 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1753790407s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 28 Jul 2025 05:17:35 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 6772 +0s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 6772 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 7101 +0.001s ... 0.006s

#10 got single benchmarks 7101 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.013s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.017s ... 0.03s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.032s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)