Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 vs Samsung Exynos 850

Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916

► remove from comparison Qualcomm 410 MSM8916

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 (MSM8916) is a ARM based mid-range SoC for tablets and smartphones (mostly Android based). It was announced in Dec. 2013 and was the first 64-Bit SoC by Qualcomm. It integrates four ARM Cortex-A53 (quad-core) processor cores, a Adreno 306 graphics card, a 64 Bit LPDDR2/3 memory controller and WLAN, Bluetooth, and UMTS/LTE radio.

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916Samsung Exynos 850
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonSamsung
CodenameCortex-A53Cortex-A55
Series: Cortex-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 compare2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 compare1.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 compare2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 MSM8952 compare1.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 616 MSM8939v2 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 MSM8939 compare1.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 610 MSM8936 compare1.7 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 (MSM8937) compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 415 MSM8929 compare1.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 (MSM8917) compare1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 « 1.4 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 APQ8016 compare1.2 GHz4 / 4 cores Cortex-A53
Samsung Exynos 850 « - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A55
Allwinner A523 compare0.48 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores1 MB L3 Cortex-A55
UNISOC SC9863A compare1.2 - 1.6 GHz8 / 8 cores512 KB L3 Cortex-A55
Clock1400 MHz <=2000 MHz
Cores / Threads4 / 48 / 8
Technology28 nm8 nm
FeaturesAdreno 306 GPU, WLAN, Bluetooth, LTE, FM, NFC, GPS/GLOSNASS/BeiDou, 32/64 Bit LPDDR2/3 Memory ControllerLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 306 (450 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
18816 Points (16%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
0 Points (0%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 579     avg: 688     median: 714 (8%)     max: 770 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 119     avg: 167.3     median: 178 (8%)     max: 183 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 519     avg: 900     median: 1042 (2%)     max: 1087 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 515     avg: 516     median: 516 (5%)     max: 517 Points
987 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1261     avg: 1322     median: 1322 (1%)     max: 1383 Points
4986 Points (6%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
391 Points (5%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
918 Points (2%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1170     avg: 1414     median: 1426 (3%)     max: 1563 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 462     avg: 479.7     median: 476 (9%)     max: 528 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 11843     avg: 14378     median: 13968 (16%)     max: 20618 ms
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
min: 1022     avg: 1395     median: 1380 (15%)     max: 1760 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 0.9.1 Total Score *
min: 1262     avg: 1373     median: 1372.5 (13%)     max: 1483 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 1447     avg: 2659     median: 2737.5 (2%)     max: 3296 Points
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (5%)     max: 5904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (8%)     max: 39 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal
min: 720     avg: 862     median: 799 (21%)     max: 1219 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta
min: 966     avg: 1165     median: 1164 (26%)     max: 1313 Points
Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser
min: 1929     avg: 2030     median: 2024 (27%)     max: 2139 Points
Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score
min: 11992     avg: 13834     median: 13943.5 (32%)     max: 15455 points
AnTuTu v4 - AnTuTu v4 Total Score
20844 Points (48%)
AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total Score
min: 20041     avg: 21467     median: 21313 (21%)     max: 23242 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
min: 18230     avg: 24859     median: 26409 (9%)     max: 28232 Points
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM
3608 Points (11%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX
11411 Points (14%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU
1139 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU
19618 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score
35776 Points (6%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (8%)     max: 146815 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (11%)     max: 43937 Points
AndEBench - AndEBench Java
min: 403     avg: 540     median: 405 (12%)     max: 812 Iter./s
AndEBench - AndEBench Native
min: 6416     avg: 7524     median: 7580 (25%)     max: 8577 Iter./s
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
min: 9346     avg: 10830     median: 9857 (1%)     max: 13288 Points
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life
473 min (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
1635 Points (9%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
2006 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 2217     avg: 2944     median: 2913 (19%)     max: 3701 Points
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 2217     avg: 3493     median: 3691 (18%)     max: 4126 Points
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
8331 Points (13%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 4894     avg: 5492     median: 5739 (27%)     max: 6065 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 206% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 05. 05:17:05

#0 checking url part for id 4974 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 May 2024 05:40:37 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.062s ... 0.063s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.063s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 4974 +0.003s ... 0.066s

#7 got single benchmarks 4974 +0.073s ... 0.139s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.016s ... 0.155s

#9 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.023s ... 0.179s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.179s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.046s ... 0.224s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.161s ... 0.385s

#13 return log +0.034s ... 0.419s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)