Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-2415M vs Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

Intel Core i5-2415M

► remove from comparison Intel 2415M

The Intel Core i5-2415M is a fast dual core processor at the time of introduction in Q1 2011. It is based on the Sandy Bridge architecture and offers Hyperthreading to handle 4 threads at once (for a better usage of the pipeline). Compared to the similar Core i5-2410M, the 2415M is manufactured with a smaller package and only for the BGA1023 socket. In difference to the faster Core i7, the i5 offers a smaller last level cache of 3MB. The base clock speed is 2.3 GHz but due to Turbo Boost it can reach 2.6 GHz (2 cores active) and 2.9 GHz (1 core active). Compared to the 2510M, the 2415M does not support AES, VT-d, and Trusted Execution functions.

Sandy Bridge is the evolutionary successor of the Arrandale architecture. The most noteable improvements is the improved Turbo 2.0 and the integration of the graphics card into the 32nm CPU core. 

The i5-2415M offers an integrated graphics card ( Intel HD Graphics 3000) which is clearly faster then the older Intel HD Graphics in the Arrandale CPUs. As the new GPU is included in the CPU, it is also manufactured in 32nm and shares the fast level 3 cache with the CPU cores (using a new ring bus). In the 2415M it is clocked from  650-1200MHz (with Turbo Boost). The faster Sandy Bridge CPUs are clocked up to 1300 MHz (like the i5-2520M).

Furthermore, an improved dual-channel DDR3 memory controller is included on the CPU die that is used by the CPU and GPU part.

Due to the improved architecture and the new Turbo Boost 2.0, the average performance of the Core i5-2415M is higher than a similar clocked Arrandale Core i5. In our benchmarks, the 2415M was able to beat the fast Intel Core i5-560M with 2.7-3.2GHz and is therefore suited for even demanding tasks. Detailed benchmarks can be found below and on the detail page of the similar Core i5-2410M.

The 35W TDP rating includes the integrated GPU and memory controller.

Intel Core 2 Duo T8100

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 is a mid-range dual-core processor for laptops from 2008. It is based on the Penryn core and offers all functions that were available at that time (e.g. Virtualization VT-x).

ModelIntel Core i5-2415MIntel Core 2 Duo T8100
CodenameSandy BridgePenryn
SeriesIntel Core i5Intel Core 2 Duo
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core i5-2540M compare2.6 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2520M compare2.5 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2450M compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2435M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2430M compare2.4 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2415M « 2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2410M compare2.3 - 2.9 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2557M compare1.7 - 2.7 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2467M compare1.6 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-2537M compare1.4 - 2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 compare2.92 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 « 2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2300 - 2900 MHz2100 MHz
L1 Cache128 KB
L2 Cache512 KB3 MB
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors624 Million410 Million
Technology32 nm45 nm
Die Size149 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C105 °C
SocketBGA1023BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesHD Graphics 3000 (650-1200MHz), DDR3-1066/1333 Memory Controller (max 8GB), HyperThreading, AVX, Quick Sync, VirtualizationVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable Bit, Idle States
iGPUIntel HD Graphics 3000 (650 - 1300 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
FSB800
Voltage1.000V-1.250V V
$209 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 2415M +
2.4 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3666 Points (22%)
min: 2217     avg: 2310     median: 2320 (14%)     max: 2357 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
7444 Points (5%)
min: 4102     avg: 4251     median: 4282 (3%)     max: 4332 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 2415M +
9156 Points (6%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 2415M +
4607 Points (6%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 2415M +
632 s (7%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
19 s (4%)
37.5 s (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2887 Points (6%)
min: 1764     avg: 1851     median: 1878 (4%)     max: 1909 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
13 s (3%)
min: 23     avg: 23.4     median: 23.1 (5%)     max: 24.23 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
31 s (1%)
min: 54.6     avg: 55.2     median: 55 (2%)     max: 56 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
735 s (3%)
1347 s (6%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
46300 MIPS (22%)
19291 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
9430 MFLOPS (7%)
15392 MFLOPS (12%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 3250     avg: 4504     median: 4605 (10%)     max: 5677 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T8100 +
min: 4     avg: 4.8     median: 5 (71%)     max: 5.1 Points
Windows 7 Experience Index - Win7 CPU
100%
1 2415M +
6.9 Points (88%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 T8100 +
4046 Points (3%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-2415M → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 → 68% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 06. 08:33:23

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 2345 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 380 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1757140403s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 04 Sep 2025 05:17:50 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.006s ... 0.007s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.007s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 2345 +0.001s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 2345 +0.003s ... 0.011s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 380 +0.001s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 380 +0.011s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.011s ... 0.033s

#13 return log +0.002s ... 0.036s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)