Notebookcheck Logo

AMD Ryzen 3 2200U vs Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y

AMD Ryzen 3 2200U

► remove from comparison

The AMD Ryzen 3 2200U is a mobile APU for thin and light laptops that was announced in October 2017. It includes two Zen cores clocked at 2.5 to 3.4 GHz and offers SMT (four threads at once) and 4 MB L3-Cache. The integrated graphics card is called Radeon RX Vega 3 and offers only 3 CUs (192 Shaders) clocked at up to 1000 MHz. The TDP is configurable between 12 and 25 Watt (15 Watt nominal).

More information on Raven Ridge can be found in our launch article.

Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y

► remove from comparison Intel Pentium 4410Y

The Intel Pentium 4410Y is a low power entry level processor for small laptops or tablets and based on the Kaby Lake architecture. It was announced in Q2 2017 and offers two processor cores clocked at 1.5 GHz (no Turbo Boost). Thanks to Hyper Threading, the processor can execute up to four threads simultaneously. The chips also includes the Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU, a dual-channel memory controller (DDR3L/LPDDR3) as well as VP9 and H.265 video de- and encoder. It is still produced in a 14 nm process with FinFET transistors. Compared to the much faster Core m3-7Y30, the Pentium 4410 offers no Turbo Boost, different CPU and GPU clock speeds, a smaller L3 cache and a higher TDP of 6 Watt.

Architecture

Intel basically used the familiar micro architecture from the Skylake generation, so the per-MHz performance is identical. Only the Speed-Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of the voltages and clocks was improved, and the matured 14 nm process now also enables much higher frequencies and better efficiency than before. 

Performance

Due to the missing Turbo Boost, the Pentium 4410Y offers a significantly worse single thread performance than the more expensive Core m3-7Y30. This should be noticeable in daily tasks. The similar Pentium 4415Y is slightly faster due to the 100 MHz higher core clock of the processor cores.

Graphics

The integrated Intel HD Graphics 615 GPU has 24 Execution Units (EUs) like the old HD Graphics 515 and runs with clocks between 300 and 850 MHz in combination with this processor. The performance heavily depends on the TDP limit as well as the memory configuration; with fast LPDDR3-1866 RAM in dual-channel mode, the GPU should sometimes be able to compete with the HD Graphics 520, but can also be much slower in other scenarios. Modern games from 2016 will, if at all, only run smoothly in the lowest settings.

Contrary to Skylake, Kaby Lake now also supports hardware decoding for H.265/HEVC Main10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec.

Power Consumption

The chip is manufactured in an improved 14 nm process with FinFET transistors, so the power efficiency was once again improved significantly. The TDP is rated at 6 Watt and can be reduced to 4,5 Watt (cTDP down).

ModelAMD Ryzen 3 2200UIntel Pentium Gold 4410Y
SeriesAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)Intel Kaby Lake
CodenameZenKaby Lake
Series: Kaby Lake Kaby Lake
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G compare3.6 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 2700U compare2.2 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G compare3.5 - 3.7 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2600H compare3.2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded V1605B compare2 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U compare2 - 3.4 GHz4 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1606G compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 2200U « 2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200U compare2.5 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Ryzen Embedded R1505G compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
AMD Athlon 300U compare2.4 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700K compare4.2 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700 compare3.6 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6 compare3.1 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7920HQ compare3.1 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700T compare2.9 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7600K compare3.8 - 4.2 GHz4 / 4 cores8 MB L3
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v6 compare3 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HQ compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7820HK compare2.9 - 3.9 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7700HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500 compare3.4 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7440HQ compare2.8 - 3.8 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7567U compare3.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7660U compare2.5 - 4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7600U compare2.8 - 3.9 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300HQ compare2.5 - 3.5 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7500T compare2.7 - 3.3 GHz4 / 4 cores6 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7287U compare3.3 - 3.7 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7560U compare2.4 - 3.8 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7267U compare3.1 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7360U compare2.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7500U compare2.7 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7300U compare2.6 - 3.5 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7260U compare2.2 - 3.4 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7200U compare2.5 - 3.1 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100H compare3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7167U compare2.8 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core i7-7Y75 compare1.3 - 3.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y57 compare1.2 - 3.3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i5-7Y54 compare1.2 - 3.2 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7100U compare2.4 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y32 compare1 - 3 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core m3-7Y30 compare1 - 2.6 GHz2 / 4 cores4 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965U compare2.2 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Core i3-7020U compare2.3 GHz2 / 4 cores3 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3867U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3865U compare1.8 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4425Y compare1.7 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4415Y compare1.6 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Pentium Gold 4410Y « 1.5 GHz2 / 4 cores2 MB L3
Intel Celeron 3965Y compare1.5 GHz2 / 2 cores2 MB L3
Clock2500 - 3400 MHz1500 MHz
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1 MB512 KB
L3 Cache4 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 42 / 4
TDP15 Watt6 Watt
Transistors4500 Million
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketAM4FCBGA1515
FeaturesXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTDual-Channel DDR3L-1600/LPDDR3-1866 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NI, TXT
iGPUAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 615 (300 - 850 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
max. Temp.100 °C
$161 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 275     avg: 311.8     median: 312 (2%)     max: 348 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 105     avg: 116.8     median: 117 (35%)     max: 128 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 2.68     avg: 3     median: 3 (4%)     max: 3.29 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 0.85     avg: 1.1     median: 1.1 (28%)     max: 1.44 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3729     avg: 3978     median: 3977.5 (24%)     max: 4226 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 6745     avg: 7776     median: 7775.5 (6%)     max: 8806 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
459.3 s (5%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
14.3 s (3%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 1436     avg: 1545     median: 1545 (2%)     max: 1654 Points
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
17.8 fps (6%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
92 fps (21%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
min: 0.201     avg: 0.2     median: 0.2 (0%)     max: 0.22 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 0.285     avg: 0.3     median: 0.3 (6%)     max: 0.355 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 2     avg: 2.1     median: 2.1 (5%)     max: 2.2 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 3006     avg: 3387     median: 3386.5 (7%)     max: 3767 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 12.96     avg: 13     median: 13 (3%)     max: 13 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 29.71     avg: 30.9     median: 30.9 (1%)     max: 32 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 750     avg: 757     median: 756.5 (3%)     max: 763 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
min: 9576     avg: 9917     median: 9916.5 (9%)     max: 10257 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 2831     avg: 3344     median: 3327 (9%)     max: 3873 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
43616 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
43415 Points (35%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 36120     avg: 42472     median: 42471.5 (36%)     max: 48823 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 2206     avg: 2687     median: 2716 (7%)     max: 3140 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 4073     avg: 4412     median: 4571 (8%)     max: 4591 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
1310 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
667 Points (28%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1267 Points (2%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
3583 Points (36%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6937 Points (8%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
3459 Points (47%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
6644 Points (16%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
min: 6766     avg: 6827     median: 6826.5 (12%)     max: 6887 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
min: 2898     avg: 2925     median: 2925 (57%)     max: 2952 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 7169     avg: 7279     median: 7279 (11%)     max: 7389 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 3163     avg: 3190     median: 3190 (48%)     max: 3217 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
7302 Points (59%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5378 Points (49%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
8741 Points (17%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
7307 Points (15%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
7422 Points (19%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 1396     avg: 1688     median: 1687.5 (2%)     max: 1979 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
115.9 ms (1%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 20430     avg: 22930     median: 22930 (21%)     max: 25430 Points
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
25.5 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
24 Watt (4%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Efficiency - external Monitor
12.8 Points per Watt (10%)

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 3 2200U → 0% n=

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
log 18. 05:03:18

#0 checking url part for id 9670 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9584 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 17 May 2024 11:21:47 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.039s ... 0.04s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.04s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 9670 +0.003s ... 0.043s

#7 got single benchmarks 9670 +0.035s ... 0.078s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 9584 +0.003s ... 0.081s

#9 got single benchmarks 9584 +0s ... 0.082s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.082s

#11 min, max, avg, median took s +0.185s ... 0.267s

#12 return log +0.025s ... 0.291s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)