Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Adreno 644 vs Qualcomm Adreno 680

Qualcomm Adreno 644

► remove from comparison Qualcomm Adreno 644

The Qualcomm Adreno 644 is a smartphone and tablet GPU that is integrated within the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 SoC. The chip was announced mid 2022 and was available in early 2023 in upper mid-range Android smartphones.

According to Qualcomm, the Adreno 644 GPU offers a 20% improved performance over the Adreno 642, its predecessor, which is integrated in the Snapdragon 780G SoC. This is also thanks to the fast LPDDR5 with 3200 MHz. In our benchmarks with the Mi 13 Lite however, the performance was only on par with the old Adreno 642.

The Adreno 644 supports OpenCL 2.0 FP, OpenGL ES 3.2 and Vulkan 1.1.

The Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 is manufactured in the modern 4nm process with EUV at Samsung that should provide a good power efficiency.

Qualcomm Adreno 680

► remove from comparison

The Qualcomm Adreno 680 is an integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx SoC for Windows laptops. According to Qualcomm it is 2x faster than the previous Adreno 630 in the Snapdragon 850 for Windows PCs with a 60% improved efficiency (thanks to the 7nm process). The performance should be similar to a Intel UHD Graphics 620 (e.g. in a 8th gen Core i5) when running native ARM64 compiled Windows apps and games. Running emulated 32 bit games (64 bit games compiled for AMD/Intel are not supported), the performance is notably slower.

show full text
Qualcomm Adreno 644Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 600 Series
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Adreno 660 compare
Adreno 650 compare @ 0.25 - 0.67 GHz
Adreno 690 compare
Adreno 685 compare
Adreno 680
Adreno 644
Adreno 643 compare @ 0.81 GHz
Adreno 642 compare
Adreno 642L compare
Adreno 640 compare
Adreno 630 compare
Adreno 620 compare
Adreno 619 compare
Adreno 619L compare
Adreno 618 compare
Adreno 616 compare
Adreno 612 compare
Adreno 610 compare
Shared Memoryyesyes
APIOpenGL ES 3.2DirectX 12
technology4 nm7 nm
FeaturesOpenGL ES 3.2, OpenCL 2.0, DirectX 12, Vulkan 1.1
Date of Announcement07.05.2021 06.12.2018
PredecessorAdreno 642
Power Consumption7 Watt
CPU in Adreno 644GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 18 x 1800 MHz? MHz? MHz
CPU in Adreno 680GPU Base SpeedGPU Boost / Turbo
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G8 x 3150 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx8 x 2840 MHz, 7 W? MHz? MHz
min. - max.? MHz? MHz

Benchmarks

3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark - 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Score
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance GPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Cinebench R10 Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit) + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Shading (32bit)
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench 5.0 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench - GFXBench Car Chase Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench 3.1 - GFXBench Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench 3.0 - GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan Offscreen
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 644
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 - GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
GFXBench T-Rex HD Offscreen C24Z16 + Qualcomm Adreno 680
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 GPU
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Basemark GPU 1.2 - Basemark GPU 1.2 Vulkan Official Medium Offscreen 1080
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU OpenCL
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 GPU Vulkan
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
ComputeMark v2.1 - ComputeMark v2.1 Result
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 2D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 3D Graphics Tests
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - Furmark Stress Test Power Consumption - external Monitor *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
Power Consumption - GFXBench Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen Power Consumption 150cd *
Maximum value not found for - , could not paint bar!
- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Game Benchmarks

The following benchmarks stem from our benchmarks of review laptops. The performance depends on the used graphics memory, clock rate, processor, system settings, drivers, and operating systems. So the results don't have to be representative for all laptops with this GPU. For detailed information on the benchmark results, click on the fps number.

Diablo Immortal

Diablo Immortal

2022
low Medium
100%
Adreno 644:
42  fps
ultra Ultra
100%
Adreno 644:
45  fps
Armajet

Armajet

2020
high
100%
Adreno 644:
45 89 ~ 67 fps
PUBG Mobile

PUBG Mobile

2018
low
100%
Adreno 644:
60 60 ~ 60 fps
med.
100%
Adreno 644:
40  fps
high
100%
Adreno 644:
40 40 40 40 40 ~ 40 fps
Dead Trigger 2

Dead Trigger 2

2013
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60  fps
Subway Surfers

Subway Surfers

2012
high
100%
Adreno 644:
60 61 ~ 61 fps

Average Gaming Qualcomm Adreno 644 → 100%

Average Gaming 30-70 fps → 100%

Qualcomm Adreno 644lowmed.highultraQHD4K
Diablo Immortal4245
Armajet67
PUBG Mobile604040
Dead Trigger 260
Subway Surfers61
< 30 fps
< 60 fps
< 120 fps
≥ 120 fps
1
1

1


1
3

1







For more games that might be playable and a list of all games and graphics cards visit our Gaming List

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.26
Errors [Close]

#0 Stopped to cacheFillTable as currently in progress (1 sys_registry entries found) +0s ... 0.005s

#1 sys_registry tx_nbc2fe_gpusingle_1 entry uid:586099 from 2024.06.03 10:15 +0s ... 0.005s

#2 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7472> for benchmark 201, setting:1054 +0s ... 0.142s

#3 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 9414> for benchmark 201, setting:1055 +0s ... 0.143s

#4 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 6466> for benchmark 201, setting:1057 +0s ... 0.144s

#5 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7388> for benchmark 201, setting:1058 +0s ... 0.145s

#6 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 3184> for benchmark 201, setting:2348 +0s ... 0.146s

#7 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 854> for benchmark 201, setting:2465 +0s ... 0.147s

#8 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2044> for benchmark 73, setting:294 +0s ... 0.149s

#9 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2278> for benchmark 73, setting:295 +0s ... 0.15s

#10 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 353> for benchmark 22, setting:38 +0s ... 0.151s

#11 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 7.9> for benchmark 365, setting:2715 +0s ... 0.152s

#12 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 18> for benchmark 365, setting:1696 +0s ... 0.153s

#13 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 49> for benchmark 365, setting:1690 +0s ... 0.154s

#14 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 40> for benchmark 365, setting:979 +0s ... 0.154s

#15 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 67> for benchmark 327, setting:884 +0s ... 0.155s

#16 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 94> for benchmark 260, setting:743 +0s ... 0.157s

#17 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 158> for benchmark 216, setting:640 +0s ... 0.158s

#18 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 140.2> for benchmark 216, setting:640 +0s ... 0.159s

#19 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 187645> for benchmark 833, setting:2453 +0s ... 0.16s

#20 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 52.63> for benchmark 731, setting:2211 +0s ... 0.16s

#21 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2610> for benchmark 967, setting:2920 +0s ... 0.161s

#22 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 2993> for benchmark 967, setting:2921 +0s ... 0.163s

#23 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 1890> for benchmark 147, setting:485 +0s ... 0.163s

#24 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 30029> for benchmark 200, setting:597 +0s ... 0.164s

#25 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 42541> for benchmark 200, setting:598 +0s ... 0.165s

#26 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 12.6> for benchmark 416, setting:1156 +0s ... 0.166s

#27 Warning cache corrupt or update under way as 5.9> for benchmark 416, setting:2492 +0s ... 0.168s

log 03. 10:36:52

#0 checking url part for id 11580 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 9846 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 will recreate cache as older than 5 days: 1717403812s = 19877.358935185d, id:gpuID:11580 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 table tx_nbc2_benchcache_gpu already found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 About to fill cache table +0s ... 0.004s

#6 composed specs +0.082s ... 0.087s

#7 did output specs +0s ... 0.087s

#8 start showIntegratedCPUs +0s ... 0.087s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 11580 +0.025s ... 0.112s

#10 got single benchmarks 11580 +0.015s ... 0.127s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 9846 +0.001s ... 0.128s

#12 got single benchmarks 9846 +0.012s ... 0.14s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.14s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.142s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.143s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.144s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.145s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.146s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.147s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.149s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.15s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.151s

#23 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.152s

#24 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.153s

#25 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.154s

#26 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.154s

#27 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.155s

#28 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.157s

#29 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.158s

#30 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.159s

#31 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.16s

#32 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.16s

#33 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.161s

#34 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.163s

#35 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.163s

#36 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.164s

#37 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.165s

#38 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.166s

#39 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.167s

#40 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.168s

#41 before gaming benchmark output +0s ... 0.168s

#42 Got 15 rows for game benchmarks. +0.007s ... 0.175s

#43 composed SQL query for gamebenchmarks +0s ... 0.175s

#44 got data and put it in $dataArray +0.002s ... 0.177s

#45 benchmarks composed for output. +0.012s ... 0.189s

#46 calculated avg scores. +0s ... 0.189s

#47 return log +0.043s ... 0.232s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Graphics Card Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)