Oppo Find N6 review: finally crease-free

Name: Oppo Find N6
Brand: Oppo

Smoothed out.

With the Find N6, Oppo presents the next generation of its foldable, bringing a slimmer design, greater performance and an even better camera. The premium smartphone combines a large foldable inner display with current high-end hardware and aims to appeal to both productivity users and photography enthusiasts.
Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt, ✓ Louise Burke (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 06/12/2026 🇩🇪 🇳🇱 ...
5G Android Foldable Smartphone Touchscreen

Verdict on the Oppo Find N6

The Oppo Find N6 shows just how far foldables have come. In particular, the almost invisible hinge and the display crease that is now practically imperceptible are clear highlights and make the device much more suitable for everyday use. The build quality, slimmer format and long battery life also make the device very pleasant to use.

Test device courtesy of Oppo

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

In terms of performance, the Find N6 delivers very high speeds thanks to the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, but it throttles significantly under sustained load. Overall, the camera is among the best in the foldable segment, with the main and telephoto lenses impressing in particular, while the ultra-wide-angle lens is weaker. The display offers strong colours and good brightness, although it does not reach the peak values stated in the datasheet. Points of criticism remain the rather weak speakers, the lack of full dust-protection certification, and limited repairability and sustainability information.

Pros

+ good camera setup

+ crease-free foldable display

+ long battery life

+ fast SoC

Cons

- heavy throttling under load

- availability

- not dustproof

- mediocre speakers

Price and availability

Oppo has not announced an official RRP for the Find N6 in Europe, as the device is not officially available in the region. Nevertheless, it is offered via Amazon, including by Oppo itself, although at a fairly high price. The global model is also available from retailers such as ProShop and Gomibo, while the Chinese model can be imported via TradingShenzhen. Availability, prices and warranty terms may vary by region.

$1,349.25
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell Phone, 256GB AI Smartphone, Unlocked Android, AI Photo Edits, Large Screen, Long Battery Life, 2025, US 1 Yr Manufacturer Warranty, Blue Shadow
$1,223.31
Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - Unlocked Smartphone with Gemini - Moonstone - 256 GB
$1,159.00
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, Unlocked Android Smartphone, 512GB, Privacy Display, Galaxy AI, AI Camera, Super Fast Charging 3.0, Durable Battery, 2026, US 1 Year Warranty, Cobalt Violet

Bestpreis 1868 € Gomibo.de

Oppo Find N6 512GB stellar titanium

2. 1913 € Gomibo.at
3. 1949 € Proshop.de
4. 1949 € Proshop.at

Verdict on the Oppo Find N6
Oppo Find N6 specifications
Case: not thinner, but narrower and crease-free
Features: with Oppo AI Pen and Snap Key
Software: Find N6 will receive Android 21
Communication and GNSS: Oppo Find N6 with 5G and Wi-Fi 7
Phone functions and voice quality
Cameras: only one lens on the N6 shows weakness
Accessories and warranty: power adapter included
Input devices and operation: AI Pen with genuine added value
Foldable display: bright and accurate panel in the Find N6
Cover display: higher brightness
Performance: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for the Oppo Find N6
Emissions: Find N6 throttles heavily
Battery life: foldable with 6,000 mAh
Notebookcheck overall rating
Possible alternatives at a glance

With the Oppo Find N6, the successor to the Find N5, the manufacturer continues to develop its foldable concept and noticeably improves key weaknesses of its predecessor. In particular, the redesigned hinge results in a much flatter display crease and a generally more robust feel in everyday use.

At the same time, the device is slimmer and lighter, which makes it easier to handle when folded. Oppo has also upgraded performance, using current high-end hardware that delivers more speed and efficiency. This is complemented by an improved camera, which should benefit especially in difficult lighting conditions, as well as optimised software for better multitasking on the large inner display.

Oppo Find N6 specifications

Oppo Find N6 (Find N Series)

Processor

Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 8c/8t, 2 x 4.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Prime, 6 x 3.6 GHz Qualcomm Oryon Gen 3 Performance, Oryon v3

Graphics adapter

Qualcomm Adreno 840, Core: 1200 MHz

Memory

16 GB

, LPDDR5x

Display

8.12 inch 1.1:1, 2480 x 2248 pixel 412 PPI, Capacitive touchscreen, OLED, LTPO 1 - 120 Hz, PET & UTG;Cover display: 6.62 inches, 2616 x 1140, LTPO-OLED, 1 - 120Hz, Ceramic Guard, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 Hz

Storage

512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB

, 480.4 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, dual gyro, proximity, compass, color temperature, hall, OTG, IR-Blaster

Networking

802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 6.0, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 71, 75, 77, 78, 79), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 4.21 x 159.87 x 145.58 ( = 0.17 x 6.29 x 5.73 in)

Battery

6000 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode, Battery charge time: 50 %: 19 min, 80 %: 32 min, 100 %: 50 min; Battery charge cycles: not specified

Charging

wireless charging, fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 16

Camera

Primary Camera: 200 MPix (Samsung HP5, 1/1.56", f/1.8, 23 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Samsung JN5, 3x optical zoom, f/2.7, 70 mm, OIS) + 50 MPix (Samsung JN5, Ultra Wide / Macro, f/2.0, 15 mm, AF) + 2 MPix (Color-Sensor); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix (f/2.4, 21 mm)

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Virtual keyboard, ColorOS 16, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX TWS+, aptX Adaptive, LHDC 5.0, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a), QZSS (L1, L5), NavIC (L5) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision | DRM Widevine L1 | IP59 | USB Copy Test: 422.90 MB/s (connected to Samsung Portable SSD T7 (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | SAR: not specified | max. charging speed: 80 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless)Biometric security: capacitive fingerprint, 2D facial recognition | Vibration motor: linear | Telephony features: Dual-Nano-SIM, eSIM, Wi-Fi Calling, VoLTE Update Policy: not specified 5 years Android-Updates (till 03/2031), 6 years security patches (till 03/2032), fanless, waterproof

Released

03/17/2026

Weight

225 g ( = 7.94 oz / 0.5 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

[+] Add to comparison

» Compare devices

Case: not thinner, but narrower and crease-free

Externally, the Oppo Find N6 has changed only minimally compared with its predecessor and remains one of the thinnest foldables. However, it is slightly narrower and shorter. The foldable display’s crease creates a real wow effect, as it is practically non-existent. It can still be faintly seen by eye in certain lighting conditions. Haptically, it cannot be felt when gently swiping across the screen; only those who press more firmly on the display can feel the fold edge. This remains unchanged even after weeks of use.

The foldable smartphone's build quality is very good. The gaps are tight and even. When attempting to twist it in the unfolded state, the Find N6 can creak slightly, but otherwise it feels very stable. It is waterproof in accordance with IP59, but is not fully protected against dust ingress.

The Oppo Find N6 is available in Stellar Titanium and Blossom Orange.

Size comparison - unfolded

Size comparison - folded

Features: with Oppo AI Pen and Snap Key

The Oppo Find N6's feature set is impressive and, alongside fast USB 3.2 with image output, also includes an infrared blaster, which can be used as a remote control for numerous devices. However, UWB is not on board, and we also miss a barometer among the sensors.

Oppo provides a dedicated Snap Key, which has a similar function to the Action button on the iPhone, but is linked to Mind Space. This is an AI-supported content hub. The AI Pen is also optionally available.

Software: Find N6 will receive Android 21

The Oppo Find N6 ships with Google Android 16 and ColorOS 16. It will receive system updates for five years and security patches for a further year.

Oppo does pre-install a few third-party apps such as Netflix and Facebook, but these can be uninstalled.

Sustainability

Oppo provides information on sustainability on its website, but does not publish reports for individual products.

The Find N6 comes in fairly large packaging that is largely free of plastic, although it is shrink-wrapped in film. The foldable is not intended to be repaired by users.

Communication and GNSS: Oppo Find N6 with 5G and Wi-Fi 7

The Oppo smartphone offers broad frequency coverage for mobile communications and leaves nothing to be desired when it comes to Wi-Fi. With Wi-Fi 7, including the 6 GHz band, the Find N6 not only delivers high speeds but also shows stable transfer rates in our test.

Networking
Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	1851 (min: 1766) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1614 (min: 1559) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1862 (min: 1826) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1672 (min: 1649) MBit/s ∼100%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1505 (min: 1432) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1494 (min: 1302) MBit/s ∼89%
Honor Magic V5 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1650 (min: 1373) MBit/s ∼89%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1113 (min: 1064) MBit/s ∼67%
Oppo Find N5 Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	682 (min: 502) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1562 (min: 1218) MBit/s ∼97%
Huawei Mate X7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	944 (min: 476) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	890 (min: 841) MBit/s ∼55%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	956 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼52%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	1046 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼65%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1278 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1501 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼90%
Average of class Smartphone
iperf3 transmit AXE11000	694 (min: 52.5) MBit/s ∼37%
iperf3 receive AXE11000	740 (min: 52.2) MBit/s ∼46%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz	1264 (min: 287) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz	1399 (min: 339) MBit/s ∼84%

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1862 (1826-1902) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1505 (1432-1642) MBit/s

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1670 (1649-1693) MBit/s

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1493 (1302-1580) MBit/s

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1851 (1766-1889) MBit/s

Oppo Find N6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax/be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1611 (1559-1661) MBit/s

The Oppo Find N6 achieves a satellite fix very quickly outdoors. Indoors, it takes a little longer, but positioning is still fairly accurate.

To better assess positioning performance, we took the foldable smartphone with us on a bike ride and compared it with the Garmin Venu 2. It is noticeable that the Find N6 does not query its own position quite as frequently, but is still more accurate between buildings. Overall, this is a good performance.

Phone functions and voice quality

We liked the Oppo Find N6's voice quality in our test. When held to the ear, calls sound natural on both sides, and background noise is also filtered out well. In speaker mode, the user's voice sounds somewhat constricted, but it still allows for a decent call experience.

Cameras: only one lens on the N6 shows weakness

The Find N6’s two front cameras deliver decent results in daylight. In dim lighting, this quickly affects the level of detail, but since the main camera can also be used for selfies, this is not too serious. Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD at 30 FPS.

The rear setup impresses with a strong main camera, which was also developed in cooperation with Hasselblad. Even in low light, it still produces attractive shots, and a Master mode is implemented for ambitious users. The zoom also delivers good results up to 6x magnification, while a maximum 120x digital zoom is possible. Only the ultra-wide-angle lens disappoints a little, as it shows visible aberrations towards the edges and has only shallow depth of field. Nevertheless, the Find N6 certainly offers one of the best camera setups in a foldable.

Videos can be recorded in Ultra HD at up to 120 FPS. Those who need more frames per second will find them in slow-motion mode, although compromises have to be made in terms of resolution at 240 FPS in Full HD and 480 FPS in HD.

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Hauptkamera Hauptkamera Ultraweitwinkel 5-facher Zoom Low-Light

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

click to load images

Accessories and warranty: power adapter included

Find N6 with adapter — Find N6 with power adapter

As the Oppo Find N6 is not officially sold in Europe, an 80-watt power adapter is included in the box. The scope of delivery also includes a protective case, a USB cable (Type-A to Type-C) and a SIM tool. The Oppo AI Pen is optionally available.

The international warranty is 12 months, while the seller's statutory warranty rights apply regardless.

Input devices and operation: AI Pen with genuine added value

The Oppo Find N6's screens have good gliding properties and implement inputs precisely. The highlight is the foldable display. Not because it is foldable, but because the crease is practically neither visible nor perceptible to the touch.

Biometric security is handled by a capacitive fingerprint sensor in the power button, which unlocks the smartphone quickly and offers high recognition rates. However, the button density on the right-hand side is very high, as the volume rocker and Snap Key are also located there. The latter is positioned very high up, which means we almost always have to adjust our grip to reach it.

The optional AI Pen is a smart input stylus with Bluetooth. It sits fairly well in the hand and offers a pleasant writing feel. It has a wide range of functions and can also interact with Oppo's Mind AI. However, it cannot be used as a remote control.

Foldable display: bright and accurate panel in the Find N6

The 8.12-inch inner display uses LTPO technology and can adjust its refresh rate between 1 and 120 Hz. Nominally, the panel is said to reach up to 2,500 cd/m², but unfortunately this is not achieved in our test.

With manual brightness control, we measured 586 cd/m², while with the sensor activated on a white background, the centre of the screen reaches 1,179 cd/m². With smaller white areas, we measured up to only 1,697 cd/m².

Both displays use high-frequency PWM dimming at 2,160 Hz, which our measurements confirm. However, we also detected baseline flickering at 180 Hz. This is comparatively high-frequency, so most sensitive users should not experience any discomfort.


1194 cd/m²	1184 cd/m²	1183 cd/m²
1191 cd/m²	1179 cd/m²	1172 cd/m²
1188 cd/m²	1187 cd/m²	1176 cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1194 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1183.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.15 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 98 %
Center on Battery: 1179 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.73}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø4.97}
99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.24
CCT: 6662 K

	Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2184x1968, 8"	Honor Magic V5 OLED, 2352x2172, 8"	Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2416x2210, 8"	Oppo Find N5 AMOLED, 2480x2248, 8.1"
Screen		-15%	23%	-10%	-7%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1179	1311 11%	1330 13%	1005 -15%	1240 5%
Brightness (cd/m²)	1184	1307 10%	1357 15%	1021 -14%	1179 0%
Brightness Distribution (%)	98	95 -3%	93 -5%	97 -1%	91 -7%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.6	2.4 -50%	0.7 56%	1.4 13%	1.36 15%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.9	3.4 -17%	2 31%	3.1 -7%	3.06 -6%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	1.6	2.2 -38%	1.2 25%	2.2 -38%	2.4 -50%
Gamma	2.24 ^98%	2.03 ^108%	2.25 ^98%	2.25 ^98%	2.239 ^98%
CCT	6662 ^98%	6413 ^101%	6596 ^99%	6890 ^94%	6353 ^102%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2570 cd/m² +90%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1467 cd/m² +8%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1353 cd/m²
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1300 cd/m² -4%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5471 cd/m² +222%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2708 cd/m² +60%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1697 cd/m²
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1496 cd/m² -12%

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

180 Hz
Amplitude: 14.43 %
Secondary Frequency: 2000 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 180 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 180 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 52 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 7810 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Maximum manual display brightness — 100%

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

White balance and color reproduction are at a natural level, provided the Natural profile and Warm color temperature are selected in the settings. Otherwise, the display is cooler.

Greyscale (mode: Natural, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)

Colours (mode: Natural, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)

Saturation (mode: Natural, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.539 ms rise
1.05 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.5095 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (19.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 0.3165 ms rise
0.52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 0.2035 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 1 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.1 ms).

Outdoors, the Oppo Find N6's main display remains easy to read as long as it is not too sunny.

Viewing-angle stability is good. At shallow viewing angles, the image becomes slightly cooler and loses some brightness.

Cover display: higher brightness

The cover display is technically similar, but comes from BOE and is said to be able to reach up to 3,500 cd/m². Unfortunately, this was not achieved in the test. We only achieved 2,000 cd/m² during HDR playback.

	Oppo Find N6 OLED, 2616x1140, 6.6"	Honor Magic V5 OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2520x1080, 6.5"	Oppo Find N5 2616x1140, 6.6"	Huawei Mate X7 OLED, 2444x1080, 6.5"
Screen
Brightness middle (cd/m²)	1180	1701	1348	1358	1572
Brightness (cd/m²)	1175	1691	1346	1328	1570
Brightness Distribution (%)	97	97	94	96	96
Black Level * (cd/m²)
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	1.5	0.7	2.2	1.14	1.1
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	2.7	2	2.9	2.21	3.1
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.2	1.7	2.3	1.5	4.1
Gamma	2.26 ^97%	2.22 ^99%	2.04 ^108%	2.213 ^99%	2.26 ^97%
CCT	6710 ^97%	6396 ^102%	6461 ^101%	6504 ^100%	6980 ^93%

* ... smaller is better

Display: APL18 Peak Brightness | HDR Peak Brightness

Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Huawei Mate X7 unknown, unknown	3010 cd/m² +122%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2600 cd/m² +92%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2306 cd/m² +70%
	1353 cd/m²
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1201 cd/m² -11%

Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	4480 cd/m² +164%
Huawei Mate X7 unknown, unknown	3145 cd/m² +85%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2661 cd/m² +57%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2067 cd/m² +22%
	1697 cd/m²

Colour space (mode: Natural, colour temperature: Warm, target colour space: sRGB)

Performance: Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 for the Oppo Find N6

The Oppo Find N6 uses the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 with 16 GB of LPDDR5x RAM. Performance is excellent across the board, even though the foldable is one of the slower smartphones with this SoC.

Geekbench 6.6
Single-Core
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3649 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3462 - 3831, n=19)	3649 Points 0%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	3044 Points -17%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	2888 Points -21%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2703 Points -26%
Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=203, last 2 years)	1850 Points -49%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1297 Points -64%
Multi-Core
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9979 - 12383, n=19)	11035 Points +11%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	9979 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	9317 Points -7%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	9138 Points -8%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	8243 Points -17%
Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11811, n=203, last 2 years)	5492 Points -45%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	5234 Points -48%

PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9790 - 28557, n=12)	19614 Points +37%
Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=157, last 2 years)	15198 Points +6%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	14984 Points +5%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	14275 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	9983 Points -30%

Antutu v11 - Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (3477646 - 4273120, n=8)	3968972 Points +14%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	3477646 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	2987729 Points -14%
Average of class Smartphone (584158 - 4273120, n=34, last 2 years)	2614114 Points -25%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	2487378 Points -28%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1793229 Points -48%

CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1698 - 2856, n=14)	2307 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	1863 Points +8%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1724 Points
Average of class Smartphone (376 - 2856, n=116, last 2 years)	1213 Points -30%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	976 Points -43%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	Points -100%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	Points -100%

BaseMark OS II
Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5640 - 16690, n=13)	12806 Points +15%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	11172 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	9347 Points -16%
Average of class Smartphone (1885 - 16690, n=131, last 2 years)	7957 Points -29%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	7779 Points -30%
System
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9356 - 21153, n=13)	17100 Points +42%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	12753 Points +6%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	12074 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11637 Points -4%
Average of class Smartphone (4117 - 21153, n=131, last 2 years)	11571 Points -4%
Memory
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (5531 - 24052, n=13)	15527 Points +44%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	10779 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2760 - 24052, n=131, last 2 years)	9069 Points -16%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	8647 Points -20%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	7463 Points -31%
Graphics
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	58651 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (9859 - 61797, n=13)	49404 Points -16%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	40383 Points -31%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	28063 Points -52%
Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=131, last 2 years)	27904 Points -52%
Web
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1561 - 2587, n=13)	2173 Points +6%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	2041 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	1823 Points -11%
Average of class Smartphone (1062 - 2587, n=131, last 2 years)	1740 Points -15%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1711 Points -16%

UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (10671 - 24002, n=9)	20825 Points
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=115, last 2 years)	20751 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11465 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	10532 Points

AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Smartphone (293 - 307528, n=92, last 2 years)	17787 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (774 - 2381, n=7)	1683 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	1084 Points
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	787 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 5210, n=107, last 2 years)	678 Points +44%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	676 Points +44%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=17)	633 Points +34%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	482 Points +2%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	471 Points
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	332 Points -30%
Half Precision NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (80 - 36297, n=107, last 2 years)	2671 Points +467%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	669 Points +42%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (471 - 843, n=17)	620 Points +32%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	471 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	463 Points -2%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	334 Points -29%
Quantized NPU 1.7
Average of class Smartphone (124 - 49889, n=107, last 2 years)	3977 Points +241%
Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 16384	1576 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (974 - 1987, n=17)	1422 Points +22%
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	1167 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288	973 Points -17%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	741 Points -37%

AI Benchmark - Score V6
Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, Adreno 840, 16384	22223 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (1098 - 22780, n=8)	16771 Points -25%
Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288	11267 Points -49%
Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=82, last 2 years)	5674 Points -74%
Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro, Maleoon 935, 16384	Points -100%

The integrated Adreno 840 supports all modern graphics APIs and offers very good performance.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6924 Points
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5955 Points -14%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	5901 Points -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	5575 Points -19%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3247 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6924 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6126 Points -12%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	6121 Points -12%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	6089 Points -12%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3234 Points -53%

3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	29029 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	26398 Points -9%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	26317 Points -9%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	25231 Points -13%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	11874 Points -59%

3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9692 Points
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9657 Points 0%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	3998 Points -59%

3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	9565 Points +5%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	9122 Points
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	4043 Points -56%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2310 Points
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2007 Points -13%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1959 Points -15%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	1935 Points -16%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	993 Points -57%

3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2611 Points
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	2374 Points -9%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	2255 Points -14%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	1987 Points -24%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	998 Points -62%

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	748 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	665 fps -11%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	445 fps -41%

GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps

GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	343 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	311 fps -9%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	221 fps -36%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	59 fps -2%

GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	301 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	288 fps -4%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	177 fps -41%

GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	40 fps -33%

GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	213 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	187 fps -12%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	84 fps -61%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	67 fps +12%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	53 fps -12%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	35 fps -42%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	125 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	87 fps -30%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	81 fps -35%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	71 fps -43%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	50 fps -60%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	112 fps +87%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	60 fps 0%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps 0%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	60 fps
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	56 fps -7%

GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	288 fps
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	221 fps -23%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	196 fps -32%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	181 fps -37%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	134 fps -53%

GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53 fps
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	45 fps -15%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	42 fps -21%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	38 fps -28%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	22 fps -58%

Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total
Honor Magic V5 (Chrome 139)	329.39 Points
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (Chrome 139)	222.934 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (70.1 - 409, n=9)	182.9 Points
Average of class Smartphone (59.7 - 423, n=131, last 2 years)	158.5 Points
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	147.767 Points

Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (229 - 624, n=4)	512 runs/min
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	244 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (49.3 - 733, n=94, last 2 years)	244 runs/min

Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (14.4 - 31.4, n=7)	21.5 runs/min
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	16.6 runs/min
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	15.3 runs/min
Average of class Smartphone (3.06 - 45.5, n=106, last 2 years)	15.1 runs/min

WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (102 - 278, n=10)	169.7 Points +41%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	157 Points +31%
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	145 Points +21%
Average of class Smartphone (56 - 306, n=116, last 2 years)	141 Points +18%
Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147)	120 Points

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (47984 - 126661, n=12)	83066 Points +37%
Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147)	60680 Points
Average of class Smartphone (2800 - 126661, n=161, last 2 years)	51576 Points -15%
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	48753 Points -20%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	45665 Points -25%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=139, last 2 years)	1071 ms * -67%
Oppo Find N5 (Chrome 135)	873.45 ms * -37%
Huawei Mate X7 (Chrome 145)	786.6 ms * -23%
Oppo Find N6 (Chrome 147)	639.5 ms *
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 (284 - 799, n=16)	466 ms * +27%

* ... smaller is better

	Oppo Find N6	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7	Honor Magic V5	Oppo Find N5	Huawei Mate X7	Average 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	Average of class Smartphone
AndroBench 3-5		-33%	-20%	-27%	25%	-12%	-40%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)	3861.06	4080.35 6%	3870.06 0%	3437.47 -11%	4365.76 13%	3635 ?(1954 - 4366, n=39) -6%	2253 ?(270 - 4370, n=185, last 2 years) -42%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)	3531.83	2239.55 -37%	3360.06 -5%	3251.98 -8%	4112.78 16%	3164 ?(339 - 4113, n=39) -10%	1928 ?(103.2 - 4113, n=185, last 2 years) -45%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)	446.52	403.69 -10%	279.8 -37%	269.51 -40%	463.43 4%	413 ?(279 - 614, n=39) -8%	309 ?(47.6 - 614, n=185, last 2 years) -31%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)	637.68	51.23 -92%	391.94 -39%	339.32 -47%	1071.05 68%	491 ?(48.2 - 1071, n=39) -23%	361 ?(13.1 - 1071, n=185, last 2 years) -43%

Emissions: Find N6 throttles heavily

Temperature

The surface temperatures are unremarkable, but the SoC throttles heavily under sustained load.

Max. Load

Idle


48.3 °C 119 F	45.3 °C 114 F	38.6 °C 101 F
43.6 °C 110 F	39.1 °C 102 F	34.7 °C 94 F
29.8 °C 86 F	29 °C 84 F	28.6 °C 83 F

Maximum: 48.3 °C = 119 F
Average: 37.4 °C = 99 F


38.9 °C 102 F	42.7 °C 109 F	45 °C 113 F
35.3 °C 96 F	41.1 °C 106 F	46.3 °C 115 F
28.7 °C 84 F	28.8 °C 84 F	29.9 °C 86 F

Maximum: 46.3 °C = 115 F
Average: 37.4 °C = 99 F

Power Supply (max.) 27.5 °C = 82 F | Room Temperature 20.9 °C = 70 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37.4 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48.3 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.

3DMark stress tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	58 % +24%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	56.1 % +20%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	51.5 % +10%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	46.8 %
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	42.4 % -9%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	55.2 % +16%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	54.3 % +14%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	47.5 %
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.2 % +49%
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	53.3 % +39%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	38.4 %
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	97.7 % +108%
Oppo Find N5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	58.3 % +24%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	57.8 % +23%
Honor Magic V5 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	56.6 % +20%
Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	47 %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø23.8 (20-42.1) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.3: Ø13.6 (9.31-16.9) %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø84.5 (68.7-146.8) %

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø77.4 (66.8-129.7) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.1 (30-70.7) %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø23.4 (15.3-39.8) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.4: Ø10.1 (5.54-10.4) %

Oppo Find N6 Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite Gen 5, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø12.5 (9.28-19.8) %

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.5 (10.3-17.9) %

Huawei Mate X7 Maleoon 935, Kirin 9030 Pro, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.2: Ø6.36 (6.3-6.45) %

Speakers

The two speakers offer rather thin sound and come across as quite constricted, with bass barely discernible. Overall, the audio is very treble-heavy.

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Oppo Find N6 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.2% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 9.5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 56% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | reduced mids - on average 5% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.9% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 10% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 34%, worst was 134%
Compared to all devices tested
» 31% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 61% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Battery life: foldable with 6,000 mAh

Power consumption

Power consumption is low. The Find N6 can be charged by cable at up to 80 watts, while wireless charging is possible at 50 watts.

Power Consumption

Off / Standby	0.11 / 0.35 Watt
Idle	0.79 / 1.6 / 1.66 Watt
Load	10.75 / 11.31 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh	Honor Magic V5 5820 mAh	Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh	Huawei Mate X7 5525 mAh	Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5	Average of class Smartphone
Power Consumption		11%	15%	1%	14%	11%	7%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)	0.79	0.63 20%	0.67 15%	0.9 -14%	0.53 33%	0.813 ?(0.57 - 1.2, n=12) -3%	0.872 ?(0.39 - 1.7, n=143, last 2 years) -10%
Idle Average * (Watt)	1.6	1.48 7%	1.31 18%	1.4 13%	1.53 4%	1.283 ?(0.74 - 2.13, n=12) 20%	1.463 ?(0.7 - 4.36, n=143, last 2 years) 9%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)	1.66	1.55 7%	1.48 11%	1.9 -14%	1.56 6%	1.47 ?(0.75 - 2.18, n=12) 11%	1.65 ?(0.75 - 4.46, n=143, last 2 years) 1%
Load Average * (Watt)	10.75			7.2 33%		7.97 ?(4.2 - 11.4, n=10) 26%	6.84 ?(2.9 - 14.9, n=112, last 2 years) 36%
Load Maximum * (Watt)	11.31			12.8 -13%		11.3 ?(8.9 - 15.3, n=10) -0%	11.3 ?(4.75 - 22, n=112, last 2 years) -0%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.11 (0.993-11.3) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.69 (0.09289-15.2) Watt

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.911 (0.832-1.037) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.117 (1.048-1.805) Watt

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø9.21 (3.98-11.3) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø10.8 (10.6-10.9) Watt

Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.911 (0.832-1.037) Watt

Vivo X300 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9500; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.117 (1.048-1.805) Watt

Battery life

At almost 18 hours, the Oppo Find N6 lasts a very long time in our practical Wi-Fi test.

Battery Runtime


WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 146)		17h 59min

Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Oppo Find N6 6000 mAh	18 h
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 4400 mAh	14.3 h
Honor Magic V5 5820 mAh	16.2 h
Oppo Find N5 5600 mAh	21.8 h
Huawei Mate X7 5525 mAh	17 h

Notebookcheck overall rating

The Oppo Find N6 is a very mature foldable with an almost invisible display fold, strong camera and long battery life, which is somewhat slowed down by throttling under load and minor weaknesses in audio, sustainability and ultra-wide-angle camera despite good overall performance.

In the test: Oppo Find N6. Test device provided by Oppo.

Back to the verdict

Oppo Find N6 - 06/08/2026 v8
Daniel Schmidt

Chassis

93%

Keyboard

69 / 75 → 92%

Pointing Device

93%

Connectivity

67 / 69 → 97%

Weight

88%

Battery

91%

Display

92%

Games Performance

34 / 55 → 62%

Application Performance

74 / 85 → 87%

AI Performance

33%

Temperature

89%

Noise

100%

Audio

73 / 90 → 81%

Camera

84%

Average

70%

86%

Smartphone - Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
25%

Packaging
75%

Power Use
94.6%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
94.5%

Total Sustainability Score: 54.9%

Possible alternatives at a glance

Image	Model / Review	Price	Weight	Drive	Display
1. 86.4%	Oppo Find N6 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon:	225 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI OLED
2. 87.2%	Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 256 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 2099€	215 g	256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.00" 2184x1968 367 PPI Dynamic AMOLED 2X
3. 88.1%	Honor Magic V5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon:	217 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	7.95" 2352x2172 403 PPI OLED
4. 87%	Oppo Find N5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘ 12 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $1,349.25 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell ... 2. $1,614.04 Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U... 3. $569.05 Google Pixel Fold - Unlocked... List Price: 1577€	229 g	512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash	8.12" 2480x2248 412 PPI AMOLED
5. 85.4%	Vivo X Fold 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: 1. $439.99 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 5 5G U... 2. $1,349.25 Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Cell ... 3. $1,223.31 Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U... List Price: 1300€	217 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.03" 2480x2200 413 PPI AMOLED LTPO
6. 84.5%	Huawei Mate X7 HiSilicon Kirin 9030 Pro ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 935 ⎘ 16 GB Memory, 512 GB UFS 4.x	Amazon: List Price: 2099€	236 g	512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash	8.00" 2416x2210 409 PPI OLED

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.