Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core i5-13600K vs AMD Ryzen 9 7900

Intel Core i5-13600K

► remove from comparison Intel i5-13600K

The Intel Core i5-13600K is a fast mid-range desktop processor of the Raptor Lake series. It includes a hybrid architecture for the CPU cores with combined 14 cores. Six fast Raptor Cove performance cores (P-cores) with HyperThreading and a clock speed of 3.5 - 5.1 GHz and eight Gracemont efficiency cores without HyperThreading and a clock speed of 2.6 - 3.9 GHz.

Thanks to the faster P-cores and more E-cores, the i5-13600K is significantly faster than the old i5-12600K (especially in multi-threaded workloads. 

The 13600K is rated at 125 Watt TDP base power (PL1) and 181 Watt Turbo Power (PL2) and therefore slightly higher than the old Core i5-12600K.

AMD Ryzen 9 7900

► remove from comparison AMD R9 7900

The AMD Ryzen 9 79 00 is a high-end desktop processorfrom the Raphael series with 12 cores and hyperthreading (SMT), which means it can process up to 24 threads simultaneously. Launched in early 2023, the Ryzen 9 7900 is the fastest 12-core processor with 65 watts TDP.

The Ryzen 9 7900 clocks at 3.7 GHz base clock and reaches up to 5.4 GHz on one core in Turbo mode. This is also the difference to the higher clocked Ryzen 9 7900X.

At first glance, the internal structure of the processor has not changed fundamentally. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 is still based on the chiplet design consisting of two CCD clusters, each containing a CCX with 8 cores. However, the manufacturing process has been scaled down to 5 nm, which ensures higher clock rates. There is also the IO die, which contains the memory controller and the iGPU, among other things. This is now manufactured in a 6 nm structure width.

The AMD Ryzen 9 7900 can impress in games thanks to the significantly improved IPC.

ModelIntel Core i5-13600KAMD Ryzen 9 7900
CodenameRaptor LakeRaphael (Zen4)
SeriesIntel Raptor Lake-SAMD Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000)
Series: Raphael (Zen 4, Ryzen 7000) Raphael (Zen4)
Intel Core i9-13900K compare3 - 5.8 GHz24 / 32 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core i7-13700K compare3.4 - 5.4 GHz16 / 24 cores30 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13600K « 3.5 - 5.1 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i7-14701TE compare2.1 - 5.2 GHz8 / 16 cores33 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500 compare2.5 - 4.8 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501TE compare2.2 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14501E compare3.3 - 5.2 GHz6 / 12 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401E compare2.5 - 4.7 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-14401TE compare2 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-13500T compare1.6 - 4.6 GHz14 / 20 cores24 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D compare4.2 - 5.7 GHz16 / 32 cores128 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X compare4.7 - 5.6 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 9 7900 « 3.7 - 5.4 GHz12 / 24 cores64 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X compare4.5 - 5.4 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7700 compare3.8 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D compare4.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores96 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X compare4.7 - 5.3 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
AMD Ryzen 5 7600 compare3.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores32 MB L3
Clock3500 - 5100 MHz3700 - 5400 MHz
L2 Cache20 MB12 MB
L3 Cache24 MB64 MB
Cores / Threads14 / 20
6 x 5.1 GHz Intel Raptor Cove P-Core
8 x 3.9 GHz Intel Gracemont E-Core
12 / 24
TDP125 Watt65 Watt
Technology10 nm5 nm
Die Size257 mm2262 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C95 °C
SocketLGA 1700AM5 (LGA 1718)
FeaturesIntel UHD Graphics 770, DDR5 5600 MT/s, DDR4 3200 MT/sMMX(+), SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, x86-64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512F, FMA3, SHA, Precision Boost 2
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics 770 (300 - 1500 MHz)AMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
$319 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comwww.amd.com
L1 Cache768 KB
Transistors9.9 Million
Voltage0.650 - 1.475V V

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - i5-13600K
42.9 pt (71%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - R9 7900
46.1 pt (77%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
min: 24174     avg: 24221     median: 24221 (22%)     max: 24268 Points
24776 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
min: 1991     avg: 2001     median: 2000.5 (84%)     max: 2010 Points
1966 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
min: 766     avg: 771     median: 770.5 (84%)     max: 775 Points
762 Points (83%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
min: 9217     avg: 9241     median: 9241 (23%)     max: 9265 Points
9703 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 3641     avg: 3642     median: 3642 (23%)     max: 3643 Points
4020 Points (25%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 286     avg: 287.5     median: 287.5 (80%)     max: 289 Points
315 Points (87%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
min: 42.2     avg: 42.3     median: 42.3 (55%)     max: 42.38 Points
45.3 Points (59%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
min: 3.45     avg: 3.5     median: 3.5 (82%)     max: 3.48 Points
3.7 Points (87%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 10710     avg: 10755     median: 10754.5 (65%)     max: 10799 Points
8339 Points (50%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 67973     avg: 68880     median: 68879.5 (50%)     max: 69786 Points
60934 Points (44%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
min: 110412     avg: 110969     median: 110969 (71%)     max: 111526 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
min: 16074     avg: 16155     median: 16154.5 (20%)     max: 16235 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
min: 172.189     avg: 174.9     median: 174.9 (2%)     max: 177.592 s
46.8 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
min: 2.518     avg: 2.5     median: 2.5 (1%)     max: 2.527 s
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
min: 10937     avg: 10967     median: 10967 (17%)     max: 10997 Points
10154 Points (16%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
min: 89527     avg: 89587     median: 89587 (51%)     max: 89647 MIPS
112881 MIPS (65%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
min: 6253     avg: 6378     median: 6377.5 (75%)     max: 6502 MIPS
7936 MIPS (94%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
min: 198.6     avg: 198.8     median: 198.8 (66%)     max: 199 fps
207 fps (69%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
min: 387     avg: 387.5     median: 387.5 (89%)     max: 388 fps
355.5 fps (82%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
min: 27.5     avg: 27.6     median: 27.6 (48%)     max: 27.6 fps
31.2 fps (55%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.7 GB/s (50%)
2 GB/s (59%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
min: 3.1     avg: 3.2     median: 3.2 (54%)     max: 3.2 GB/s
3.1 GB/s (53%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
min: 18.8     avg: 19.1     median: 19.1 (50%)     max: 19.4 GB/s
21.5 GB/s (56%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
224 Seconds (3%)
199 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
135 Seconds (1%)
125 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4048     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.405 sec
0.4 sec (8%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
17627 Points (38%)
19451 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 6.471     avg: 6.5     median: 6.5 (1%)     max: 6.58 s
6.7 s (1%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 14.876     avg: 14.9     median: 14.9 (1%)     max: 14.993 s
13.9 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 328.929     avg: 331.4     median: 331.4 (1%)     max: 333.798 s
329 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
97718 Points (75%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
min: 30358     avg: 30419     median: 30419 (75%)     max: 30480 Points
26325 Points (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
min: 86734     avg: 86952     median: 86952 (71%)     max: 87170 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
min: 87784     avg: 87861     median: 87860.5 (71%)     max: 87937 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 88547     avg: 89321     median: 89321 (72%)     max: 90095 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
min: 26359     avg: 26394     median: 26394 (67%)     max: 26429 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
min: 35386     avg: 35395     median: 35395 (63%)     max: 35404 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
min: 17079     avg: 17102     median: 17101.5 (72%)     max: 17124 Points
14817 Points (62%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Single-Core
2750 Points (69%)
2990 Points (75%)
Geekbench 6.4 - Geekbench 6.4 Multi-Core
15890 Points (62%)
15725 Points (61%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
min: 2848     avg: 2859     median: 2858.5 (91%)     max: 2869 Points
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 R9 7900 +
min: 16864     avg: 16913     median: 16912.5 (69%)     max: 16961 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1967     avg: 1973     median: 1973 (77%)     max: 1979 Points
2203 Points (86%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16651     avg: 16671     median: 16670.5 (30%)     max: 16690 Points
17880 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 1931     avg: 1948     median: 1947.5 (8%)     max: 1964 Points
2096 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 16497     avg: 16566     median: 16566 (52%)     max: 16635 Points
17581 Points (55%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 8618     avg: 8625     median: 8624.5 (86%)     max: 8631 Points
8861 Points (88%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 60407     avg: 61014     median: 61014 (61%)     max: 61621 Points
65241 Points (65%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 467     avg: 468     median: 468 (1%)     max: 469 ms
452 ms (1%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
288 Points (79%)
302 Points (83%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 329     avg: 331     median: 331 (59%)     max: 333 Points
366 Points (66%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 2237     avg: 2254     median: 2254 (84%)     max: 2271 Points
2322 Points (87%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 278     avg: 313     median: 313 (54%)     max: 348 Watt
154%
1 R9 7900 +
203 Watt (35%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 245     avg: 265.5     median: 265.5 (48%)     max: 286 Watt
135%
1 R9 7900 +
196.9 Watt (36%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
min: 69.3     avg: 73.3     median: 73.3 (48%)     max: 77.3 Watt
106.9 Watt (71%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
min: 12.7     avg: 13.8     median: 13.8 (10%)     max: 14.9 Points per Watt
148%
1 R9 7900 +
20.4 Points per Watt (15%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i5-13600K → 100% n=42

Average Benchmarks AMD Ryzen 9 7900 → 110% n=42

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.33
log 18. 01:31:57

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 14626 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 15014 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1755473516s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 16 Aug 2025 05:18:17 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.01s ... 0.01s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.01s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 14626 +0.009s ... 0.019s

#8 got single benchmarks 14626 +0.008s ... 0.027s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 15014 +0.008s ... 0.035s

#10 got single benchmarks 15014 +0.005s ... 0.04s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.04s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.086s ... 0.126s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.129s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)