Xiaomi Poco F1
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 20 MPix
Pricecompare
Average of 63 scores (from 121 reviews)
Reviews for the Xiaomi Poco F1
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a smartphone with flagship hardware, which has a good camera and long battery life but costs less than €350 (~$404). Find out in this review whether Xiaomi’s concept of an affordable flagship works and what cuts have been made to keep the cost down.
Source: Android Central Archive.org version
A year and a half after its debut, the POCO F1 continues to be a great product. The hardware still has a lot of grunt left, the battery easily lasts a day, and MIUI 11 brings a host of new features on the software front. The design hasn't held up quite as well, but the polycarbonate chassis has proved itself to be quite durable.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/16/2020
Source: DxOMark Archive.org version
Coming with a premium design and reasonably top-end specs, Xiaomi’s Pocophone F1 offers the allure of a flagship smartphone for significantly less cost than many competitors. For mobile photography enthusiasts after a bargain, the rear camera puts in a respectable performance, with decent still-image results for exposure, color, and noise in most conditions. It’s some ways behind the very best high-end devices we’ve tested for image quality, though, the current crop of dual or triple-cam flagship devices are a cut above—particularly for HDR processing, low light exposure and detail, as well as for zoom and bokeh shots. This said, the F1’s autofocus and flash systems are excellent, and its video performance is very acceptable both indoors and outdoors. So all things considered, the Pocophone F1 is an attractive proposition for the price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
If any of its downsides are just too much for you, then unfortunately you'll have to save up some more and go the extra mile - either splurging for a Pixel or iPhone or Note9 or Mate 20 Pro, or choosing the middle of the road option price-wise and going with a OnePlus 6/6T.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/11/2019
Source: Techradar Archive.org version
With a flagship-grade chipset, large battery, bright display and capable cameras all for a tantalizingly low price, the Pocophone F1 is an exciting new entry to the smartphone game. But for a few niggles, it's almost the perfect budget phone.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Gadgetspeak Archive.org version
The Pocophone F1 is a well-built device despite the plastic back cover. I encountered no performance issues during the review period and felt comfortable using this product. Currently this smartphone is listed at £349 on Amazon.co.uk and is well worth considering.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/03/2019
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 80% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
The Pocophone F1 is an outstanding phone in various ways. Most notably, the way it offers a premium set of specs for a frankly outrageous price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phone Arena Archive.org version
From a US buyer's perspective, however, things don't look as rosy. The Pocophone F1 is not officially sold in the US, and even if you import one and manage to get it working on your carrier, you won't be getting good – if any – LTE coverage. But in markets where it's officially sold, this is one value-rich smartphone. Needless to say, it’s a valiant first effort and we’re already eager to see what its successor will be able to deliver.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Neowin Archive.org version
Reviewing the Pocophone F1 is a...confusing job. It's an almost Frankenstein's monster-like contraption, forcing together best-in-class performance with the frugality of the cheapest of budget smartphones. There aren't really too many other devices for me to compare it to, making it a rather unique curiosity in the vein of the OnePlus One when it was first revealed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Slashgear Archive.org version
The Pocophone F1 is a highly decent smartphone, especially for its price. This smartphone is available on the internet in its Global edition – and there’s an India-specific version as well. Both versions have almost identical hardware – close enough for this review, anyway.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: The Techy Archive.org version
Overall, the Poco F1 is an excellent smartphone in terms of Performance and Camera capability. However, there is minor software incompatibility which we have never expected. That’s being said, if you’re looking for “flagship killer” smartphone at an attractive price point, then Poco F1 is truly made for you.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Tech Nave Archive.org version
All in all, the Pocophone F1 is a good effort by Xiaomi and I believe the successor next year will be even better (hopefully). We hope updates will fix the bugs too. But what do you think about the review? How many of you have the Pocophone F1 already? Thanks for reading as always and stay tuned for more reviews at TechNave.com.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/27/2018
Source: Android Guys Archive.org version
If you live in a region that the Pocophone F1 has support, it's an absolute must-buy. If you're in the States, well - just hope that Xiaomi decides to unleash the Pocophone on North America.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 100% features: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
Provided you can pick up the Pocophone F1 in your region, it’s an easy buy for anyone who places performance, longevity and quality ahead of the aesthetics of conventional flagship phones – and even then, it’s far from an ugly duckling.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Manila Shaker Archive.org version
A big clap, Xiaomi! I would say that other smartphone brands should be terrified of this move by Xiaomi, and consumers also need to rethink when buying expensive devices. The Pocophone F1 proves how you can get a smartphone with great flagship performance but with a price tag of a midrange one.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
The Pocophone F1 is a good phone, but an amazing deal. If you’re on a tight budget, it should definitely be at the top of your list of options. If you have a little leeway, go try out some of the other phones we mentioned.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/17/2018
Source: Mobygyaan Archive.org version
Finally coming to the verdict, the pricing is where POCO F1 grabs the attention of many. The POCO F1 may not get the perfect phone tagline, but overall is the best value for money phone till date, no matter what. The price of the POCO F1 starts at Rs 20,999 for 6 GB RAM and 64 GB storage variant.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/15/2018
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
The Pocophone F1 became a wakeup call not just for consumers but for other smartphone brands as well. Here is a device that delivers flagship performance, feels good, doesn’t have a lot of fancy features or tech, but is offered at a price that we normally see in mid-range devices. For plenty of users, this is a big win, and definitely not overpriced. For some smartphone brands, it kind of ruined a lot of things.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Source: Unbox Archive.org version
Yes, absolutely yes. All of the issues we encountered with this phone are just minor nitpicks, and are completely understandable considering the Php 17,990 price that you’ll be paying for the phone. At the end of the day, the Pocophone F1 delivers flagship performance at literally a fraction of the price of top-tier manufacturers, and around these parts that’s the only thing that matters.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Source: Tech Advisor Archive.org version
We're really impressed with what Xiaomi has done with the Pocophone F1. It's an outstandingly well specced device with an astonishing price tag.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Androidbeat Archive.org version
Even if one does not take its price into the equation, there’s no denying the fact that the Poco F1 is an impressive smartphone. With powerful internals, excellent performance, a good camera, and almost every core feature that one could think of, the Poco F1 leaves little room for complaints. Yes, the design is utilitarian and the plastic build might not impress everyone but it does make the phone more immune to dings and drops which could be a plus for people who are usually clumsy with their phones.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/06/2018
Source: Tech2 Archive.org version
If there's one thing that Xiaomi and POCO have surely done with the launch of the POCO F1, then that is announcing themselves to the world as a new force to reckon with in the flagship smartphone market. While the likes of Honor, Nokia, Motorola, Oppo and Vivo scratch their heads thinking about what hit them, companies higher up the ladder like Samsung and OnePlus are also most definitely taking note.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 90% display: 85% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: The Indian Express Archive.org version
In my opinion, Poco is trying to carve a niche in the Rs 20-30,000 price range, where the options can often vary in terms of performance, camera and battery life. This is not to say Poco F1 will be a best-seller by end of 2018. After all, it took OnePlus years to establish itself in the Indian market. Still I would say that for those who want a flagship under Rs 30,000 right now, Poco F1 is certainly a favourable option.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: NDTV Gadgets Archive.org version
With the smartphone market buzzing with so many launches, Xiaomi has managed to make a mark by pricing the Poco F1 aggressively. It has all the elements of a Xiaomi phone: a powerful processor, MIUI, and a low price. In the company’s assault on the OnePlus 6 (Review), many mid-range smartphones with far lower specifications have been taken down. The 6GB RAM/ 64GB storage variant of the Poco F1 is priced at Rs. 20,999, the 6GB RAM/ 128GB storage variant is priced at Rs. 23,999, and the 8GB RAM/ 256GB storage is priced at Rs. 28,999. The Armoured Edition, which we had for review, is priced at Rs. 29,999 and also has 8GB of RAM with 256GB of storage. Xiaomi has hit the ball right out of the park with the pricing of the Poco F1, and it’ll be interesting to see whether any manufacturer is interested in a price war.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 100% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Unbox Archive.org version
The Pocophone F1 certainly is a game-changing device. While the official Philippine pricing for the device isn’t available yet as of press time, we expect it to be along the same lines as the device’s SRP in India, which comes out at around 16K for the base variant. While the phone does compromise on some things to get to its amazing price point, you certainly can’t deny the appeal of a flagship device for cheap.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Trusted Reviews Archive.org version
As a brand Pocophone appears to be a more aggressive push from Xiaomi to take a greater hold on the global smartphone market, with the Pocophone F1 being as disruptive as they come.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/26/2018
Source: India Today Archive.org version
Shut up and take my money is the ideal way to describe the Poco F1. It checks all the boxes that you generally expect from a phone that costs 2X or 3X more. It is built rock solid, it has a gorgeous display, it is blazing fast, it's available in a range of options, it has capable cameras, it has dual speakers and it has fantastic battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: NDTV Gadgets Archive.org version
How has Xiaomi managed to pull this off, and are there any hidden downsides to the Poco F1? Stay tuned to Gadgets 360 as we put the Poco F1 through its paces for our full review, including camera performance, display quality, gaming, and battery life tests.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/23/2018
Source: Think Digit Archive.org version
The Poco F1 has flagship hardware under the hood, but mid-range everything else. The camera, build and design and the display can’t keep up with the more expensive flagships of 2018. However, if a no-nonsense performer is what you’re looking for on a budget, look no further. Know this that the software right now is riddled with bugs and the camera can’t hold a candle to say the Galaxy S9 or even the OnePlus 6. You do get a sturdy build that should last long, and perhaps the longest battery life on a Snapdragon 845-powered smartphone. At Rs 20,999 though, it can’t get any better.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: The Mobile Indian Archive.org version
The Poco F1 from Xiaomi has all the quality of a real premium flagship device. The phone is powered by the top-of-the-line Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 chipset coupled with an ample amount of RAM and storage. The battery looks promising and so is the display. As for the competition is concerned, all other phones in this price range seem a bit underdog if we go by the sheer specs sheet.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/23/2018
Source: GSM Arena Archive.org version
The Pocophone may lack water-proofing and OIS for the camera, but if those are the cuts that had to be made to keep the price that low, we'd gladly take that. The Poco F1 is the all-around performer many have been waiting for since OnePlus decided to go more premium. Sorry 1+, the Flagship Killer title now belongs to another phone - the Pocophone F1. It sure is shaping up to be a must-buy!
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/22/2018
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Pocket Lint Archive.org version
Whether we like the brand name or not, the Pocophone F1 offers a lot for little money. There's lots of power, lots of screen, lots of storage and considerable longevity.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/22/2018
Source: Android Authority Archive.org version
The no-frills Pocophone F1 is just the beginning and we’re excited to see where the Poco family can go in the future. It’s not completely clear why Xiaomi decided it needed a sub-brand, considering it could sell the powerful Mi 8 at a competitive price and really give all the “flagship killers” a run for their money. Perhaps the strategy will become clearer over the coming year, as Xiaomi works to differentiate its product lines. For now though, let’s just say that the Pocophone brand is off to a great start.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/22/2018
Source: Tech PP Archive.org version
It is not going to be the first phone that comes to mind when someone talks of cutting-edge design. Nor will it be among the contenders for the greatest camera or display. Yes, its battery life and speed of performance are brilliant, but again it does not really stand alone in those departments. There are others. Even its price edge might get eroded with time (price edges always do – just ask Motorola).
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 95% performance: 90% workmanship: 85%
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Mag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 98% display: 80% mobility: 84% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android Smartphone - 6/18
Single Review, , Medium, Date: 11/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 98% display: 80% mobility: 83% workmanship: 80%
Source: MobiFlip DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: ChinaMobileMag DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/13/2018
Source: Allround-PC.com DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/09/2018
Source: PC Welt DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 95% performance: 98% features: 97% display: 94% mobility: 98%
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/21/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Chip.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 95% features: 82% display: 92% mobility: 96%
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2018
Source: Chinahandys.net DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% performance: 100% display: 100% mobility: 90% workmanship: 90%
Source: Tech.de DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 91% performance: 99% display: 88% mobility: 92% workmanship: 86%
Source: WinFuture DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/30/2018
Source: Android Pit DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: Geeknetic ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/29/2019
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: MuyComputer ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 88% performance: 100% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Computerhoy ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% features: 90% display: 90% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Movil Zona ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2018
Rating: price: 90% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 70%
Source: Hipertextual ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 83% performance: 85% display: 85% mobility: 93% workmanship: 75%
Source: Zona Movilidad ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful processor; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 01/20/2019
Source: Xataka ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent cameras; high autonomy; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/14/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/01/2018
Source: FAQsAndroid ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Fast system; nice cameras; long battery life; good price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful hardware; high performance; decent cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Source: El chapuzas Informatico ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful hardware; excellent display; high autonomy; good speakers; good cooling system. Negative: No NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Source: El Androide Libre ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Nice performance; large battery capacity; nice display; good cameras. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/04/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; great built quality; decent hardware.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: PC Guia PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 02/20/2019
Rating: Total score: 85%
Source: Pplware PT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100% workmanship: 70%
Source: Target HD PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; long battery life; beautiful screen; great built quality; impressive cameras; good price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 02/05/2019
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 90% features: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Techzilla.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2018
Rating: Total score: 78% price: 90% display: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 65%
Source: Chimera Revo IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/24/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: HDblog.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Tutto Android IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 95% features: 92% display: 82% mobility: 92% ergonomy: 80%
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/02/2018
Rating: Total score: 84% price: 85% features: 90% display: 75% mobility: 80% workmanship: 70% ergonomy: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/29/2018
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 92% display: 75% mobility: 92% workmanship: 75%
Source: Smartphone Italia IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; nice display; decent hardware; good cameras; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/15/2018
Source: Leonardo.it Tech IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Decent processor; attractive price; elegant design; nice performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Pianeta Cellulare IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Metal case; premium design; good price; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/18/2018
Source: Everyeye.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; large battery capacity; good price. Negative: Poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/18/2018
Source: Cinafoniaci IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice design; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2018
Source: AndroidPit.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; large battery capacity; good price. Negative: Unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: Computer Totaal NL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/27/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: AndroidWorld.nl NL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; decent hardware; nice cameras; long battery life; good cooling system.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 02/06/2019
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Tablette-tactile.net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/16/2018
Rating: Total score: 95%
Source: Le monde numerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 100% workmanship: 80%
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/25/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: 01Net FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/17/2018
Rating: Total score: 86% performance: 100% mobility: 90%
Source: Les Mobiles FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/12/2018
Rating: Total score: 86%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/05/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/01/2018
Rating: Total score: 90% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; attractive design; long battery life; fast charging. Negative: No NFC; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/06/2019
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; solid workmanship; nice display; good performance; high autonomy.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/07/2018
Source: Phonandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice design; solid workmanship.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/29/2018
Source: Erenumerique FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; impressive design.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/28/2018
Source: AndroidPit.fr FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; large battery capacity; good price; nice design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: 90 Sekund PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2019
Rating: Total score: 82% price: 100% features: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Source: Tabletowo PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 85% performance: 95% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Rating: Total score: 73% display: 60% mobility: 80%
Source: Komputerswiat PL→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; high performance; solid workmanship. Negative: Plastic case; poor cameras; no NFC; no wireless charging; mediocre headphone output.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/04/2018
Source: Helpix RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/19/2019
Rating: Total score: 100%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail RU→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 72% performance: 70% display: 90% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Zoom RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Big screen; great built quality; large battery capacity; good price. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/29/2018
Source: Hitech Vesti RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; bright screen; good autonomy; face ID; fast charging; attractive price. Negative: Plastic case; combined slot; no NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; long battery life; nice cameras; elegant design; good cooling system. Negative: No NFC.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/18/2018
Source: DGL.ru RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice performance; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2018
Source: Mega Obzor RU→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; long battery life; good price. Negative: Poor cameras; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/30/2018
Source: Svet Androida CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: High performance; good price; decent battery life; face ID. Negative: No NFC; large frames.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/07/2018
Source: CZC CZ→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful hardware; nice display; excellent cameras; fast charging. Negative: No wireless charging; unsupported waterproof; plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/01/2018
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Attractive price; powerful hardware; good cooling system; big screen; large battery capacity; nice dual cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 08/21/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Great performance / price ratio; good price; impressive display; long battery life; fast charging.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/23/2019
Source: FPT shop VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; high gaming performance; powerful hardware; nice display; long battery life.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 12/26/2018
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful processor; nice gaming performance; good cooling system. Negative: Mediocre design; poor selfie camera.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/09/2018
Source: VNReview VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Powerful hardware; good price; high gaming performance; nice display; large battery capacity; decent selfie camera. Negative: Poor main camera; plastic case; mediocre design.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/19/2018
Source: Zing VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; powerful hardware; large screen; nice display; long battery life; quick charging. Negative: Plastic case.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 08/27/2018
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good performance; decent display; elegant design; large battery capacity; quick charging; nice cameras.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 08/14/2018
Source: Tek.no NO→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/23/2018
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Dinside NO→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Excellent AMOLED display; good price; decent hardware; modern design; thin frames; large battery capacity. Negative: Average performance; poor cameras; slow fingerprint sensor; no LED notification.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 05/02/2019
Source: Dinside NO→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; decent hardware; nice cameras. Negative: No NFC; unsupported waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/03/2019
Source: M3 PC för alla SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/10/2018
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobil.se SV→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/14/2018
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: Android Portal SK→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 92% display: 85% mobility: 95% workmanship: 85%
Source: Unlimited Tech →EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/07/2018
Rating: Total score: 92%
Source: Arena IT →EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 03/04/2019
Rating: Total score: 88% price: 100% features: 100% display: 80% mobility: 100%
Comment
Model: The new fledgling company, supported by the Chinese tech giant Xiaomi, is looking to shake things up with its first device, the Pocophone F1 – the new “Master of Speed”. In essence, Pocophone and the F1 represent a new way for Xiaomi-based hardware and software to reach new customers in more markets. The Pocophone F1 looks and feels rather generic. It feels less premium due to the polycarbonate back of the device. However, it’s not that it’s shoddy or flimsy, far from it. The finish of the dark grey (Graphite Black) version mimics metal quite well, but the F1 definitely feels less premium than the OnePlus 6 or Honor 10. On the flip side, the plastic back should fare better when dropped, even if it will scratch and wear faster than glass. The polycarbonate model is available in Graphite Black, Steel Blue, and Rosso Red. The Pocophone F1 features a 5.99-inch IPS LCD display, featuring a resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels (18:9). At 416 DPI, the pixel density is high enough to make pixels unnoticeable. Colors are nice and punchy, though OLED would have obviously delivered better contrast rates and viewing angles. The only minor issue worth noting is outdoors legibility. At full brightness, text can be a little smudgy. The primary 12-megapixel sensor with its f/1.9 aperture and 1.4 µm pixels, as well as the sizeable 20-megapixel front-facer, have both been lifted directly from Xiaomi’s 2018 flagship handset, the Xiaomi Mi 8, which is yet another benefit of Pocophone’s ties to Xiaomi’s supply line. This manifests an impressive camera experience, not only for an affordable smartphone but also for the category it is in. A user gets AI-enhanced auto mode, manual control, automated HDR shooting, real-time photo filters and Beauty mode, QR code scanning, a Portrait mode and more.
The Pocophone F1 is available in three memory-storage combinations which are 6 GB/64 GB, 8 GB/128 GB, and 8 GB/256 GB. All three versions feature a Snapdragon 845 processor (10 nm octa-core with Adreno 630 GPU). Xiaomi added a liquid cooling system to help the CPU hum along without overheating. It’s called LiquidCool, and it works by transferring heat from the processor to the other parts of the phone, a bit like an AC unit. The battery is excellent too. A 4,000 mAh unit should keep you up and running for a full day, potentially two, depending on how hard the user pushes it. The Pocophone F1 features a single speaker, found on the bottom (only one of the two grilles house a speaker). It gets pretty loud, but it tends to buzz at high volumes. And finally, Xiaomi has developed a new specific software for this terminal that has been called MIUI for POCO. This specific development manages to elevate the fluidity of the interface to unsuspected levels until now, beating rivals the likes of the Oneplus 6 or the Samsung Galaxy S9. As a conclusion, this smartphone is targeted at users who place performance, longevity, and quality ahead of the aesthetics of conventional flagship phones. It can easily manage light to heavy tasks with the given specifications, as well as snap beautiful photos and have excellent battery life.
Hands-on article by Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Qualcomm Adreno 630: Integrated graphics card in the Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SoC. According to Qualcomm 30% faster than the old Adreno 540 in the Snapdragon 835 with 30% less power consumption.
Non demanding games should be playable with these graphics cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
SD 845: High-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in early 2018 and manufactured in 10 nm LPP FinFET at TSMC. Integrates 4x Kryo 385 cores (Cortex-A75) at up to 2.8 GHz (max) for performance and 4x Kryo 385 at 1.8 GHz (max) for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X20 LTE modem, ac-WiFi and a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.18":
It is a small display format for smartphones. You shouldn't be severely defective in vision, and you won't see much detail on the screen and only have a small resolution available. For that, the device should be small and handy, easy to transport.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Xiaomi:
Founded in 2010, Xiaomi Corporation is a Chinese multinational electronics company and produces consumer electronics and related products, including smartphones, televisions, fitness bands, power banks, headphones, smart devices and accessories. Xiaomi offers its products under the Mi, Redmi and POCO brands.
84.17%: This rating is slightly above average, there are somewhat more devices with worse ratings. However, clear purchase recommendations look different.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.