Notebookcheck Logo
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro review

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Review: An excellent Snapdragon 8 Elite tablet for a low price

A lot of tablet for €500.

The new Pad 8 Pro premium tablet from Xiaomi is once again a contender for the price-performance throne. Compared to an Apple iPad Air or Galaxy Tab S11, the Pad 8 Pro seems quite affordable despite offering the best hardware. We find out how well the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro with HyperOS 3 performs in our review.
Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Florian Schmitt, Vaidyanathan Subramaniam (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 🇩🇪
Android Tablet Wi-Fi 7 Touchscreen

Verdict on the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

Like its predecessor, the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offers great value for money and is particularly interesting for users looking for a powerful Android tablet with pen support. 

The Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC is beyond reproach and, in combination with the HyperOS 3 interface and the 144 Hz panel, is extremely powerful. Even a premium tablet like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 is left behind in terms of raw performance.

Although the 11.2-inch 3:2 display of the Pad 8 Pro is only an LCD and not an OLED, there is little to criticize thanks to its high resolution, very good contrasts, and an appealing peak brightness. 

The PWM-free display in particular ensures a pleasant viewing experience without flickering — a big plus point for sensitive users, given that the screen of the Pad 8 Pro is a class above a significantly more expensive Apple iPad Air 11.

Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG

The Xiaomi tablet still leaves question marks in terms of global availability and, as a result, certain restrictions of the Chinese version of HyperOS 3 in matters of update policy, system language, etc., have to be accepted.

Pros

+ bright 144 Hz panel
+ strong runtimes
+ fast SoC
+ high-quality metal unibody build
+ USB 3.2 port

Cons

- (currently) only available as an import
- no 5G option
- no GPS

Price and availability of the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro costs ¥2,799 (approx. €335 or $394) in its base version. As an import, prices start at around €500. Details on an international launch are still pending. 

Similar to the Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro, a global market launch for the current Pro model is probably only a matter of time. MWC in spring 2026 is a likely date.

Amazon Logo
$329.99
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Version 12.1 Octa Core Global Rom 10000 mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8Mp Dual Camera (Graphite Gray, 256Gb + 8Gb)
  • $539.50
    Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Version Global (No Calls or Text) 11.2 inches 3.2K 144Hz 8850mAh Bluetooth 5.4 Four Speakers 50 Mp Cam Model 24091RPADG (Gray, 512GB + 12GB)
  • $311.52
    Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Version (No calls or Text) 12.1 Octa Core Global Rom 10000mAh Bluetooth 5.3 8Mp Dual Camera (Ocean Blue, 256Gb + 8Gb)

Xiaomi has launched a new iteration of the much-vaunted Pad 7 Pro on the market. The new Pad 8 Pro is mainly characterized by upgrades to the Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC and a slightly larger battery. 

Otherwise, the Pad 8 Pro's improvements are largely incremental. In this review, we look into the aspects that Xiaomi has improved and how it fares against the competition.

Specifications of the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Processor
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite 8 x 3.5 - 4.3 GHz, Oryon Gen 2
Graphics adapter
Memory
16 GB 
Display
11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, LCD, touch rate up to 1080Hz, HDR, 144 Hz
Storage
512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash, 512 GB 
, 462 GB free
Connections
1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, Miracast
Networking
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 5.8 x 251.2 x 173.4 ( = 0.23 x 9.89 x 6.83 in)
Battery
9200 mAh
Charging
fast charging / Quickcharge
Operating System
Android 16
Camera
Primary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 4K@30/60fps)
Secondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, 19 mm, 1/3.6")
Additional features
Speakers: 4 speakers, charger, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 3, 12 Months Warranty, fanless
Weight
485 g ( = 17.11 oz / 1.07 pounds), Power Supply: 107 g ( = 3.77 oz / 0.24 pounds)
Price
600 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Build: Android tablet with aluminum unibody

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro in black and blue
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro in black and blue

The Pad 8 Pro comes in a slim metal casing with a height of just 5.8 mm. The matte surface of the aluminum unibody ensures that fingerprints are barely visible. With a weight of 485 g, the Pad 8 Pro is also 15 g lighter than its predecessor.

There is no official IP certification for the Chinese version, although this information is usually only known for global Xiaomi tablets. We assume that the successor to the Pad 7 Pro will again have an IP52 rating. 

We think the overall design is very successful, with the Pad 8 Pro looking very much like an Apple iPad Pro visually.

The display impresses with a good screen-to-body ratio of over 86% and an appealing appearance with fairly narrow edges. However, it is not clear which protective glass is used for the Chinese version. Xiaomi will likely stick Gorilla Glass 3 as with the Pad 7 Pro.

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro tablet
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro tablet
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro tablet
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro tablet
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro tablet
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro tablet

Size comparison

255.5 mm / 10.1 in 165.8 mm / 6.53 in 6.2 mm / 0.2441 in 458 g1.01 lbs253.8 mm / 9.99 in 165.3 mm / 6.51 in 5.5 mm / 0.2165 in 469 g1.034 lbs251.22 mm / 9.89 in 173.42 mm / 6.83 in 6.18 mm / 0.2433 in 500 g1.102 lbs251.2 mm / 9.89 in 173.4 mm / 6.83 in 5.8 mm / 0.2283 in 485 g1.069 lbs247.6 mm / 9.75 in 178.5 mm / 7.03 in 6.1 mm / 0.2402 in 460 g1.014 lbs210 mm / 8.27 in 148 mm / 5.83 in 1 mm / 0.03937 in 2.9 g0.00639 lbs

Features: Pad 8 Pro with fast USB 3.2

An upgrade compared to the predecessor is the faster LPDDR5T memory and UFS 4.1 storage, although the basic configuration of the Pad 8 Pro only offers LPDDR5X and UFS 3.1 as standards.

The USB Type-C port complies with the USB 3.2 standard, which allows data to be transferred quickly at 5 Gbit/s speeds. With the help of an adapter, the USB port can also be used as an output for display signals on external screens.

Other features include an infrared interface, stylus support, Miracast, and USB OTG. Xiaomi's HyperConnect service for cross-device use of HyperOS devices and a workstation mode are also available. 

Display content from macOS and iPad OS can also be mirrored on the Pad 8 Pro.

Bottom
Bottom
Right: Loudspeaker, USB 3.2 port, loudspeaker
Right: Loudspeaker, USB 3.2 port, loudspeaker
Top: Microphone, volume rocker, magnetic stylus attachment, microphone
Top: Microphone, volume rocker, magnetic stylus attachment, microphone
Left: Loudspeaker, microphone, loudspeaker, power button
Left: Loudspeaker, microphone, loudspeaker, power button

Software: New HyperOS 3 on the Pad 8 Pro

The Pad 8 Pro is equipped with the company's own HyperOS 3, which is based on the latest Android 16. This gives the Xiaomi tablet more flexible window management and new animations. According to the manufacturer, HyperOS 3 can be expected to speed up the app response times by 21% and reduce power consumption by 9% when gaming.

Our Chinese version only supports an English language pack ex-works and no PlayStore. While the latter can simply be installed later, you will have to wait for a global version for the German system language. This also applies to an official update promise.

Bootloader unlocks require the Chinese ROM to be used since the unlocking of the bootloader under HyperOS is problematic to implement outside of China.

In terms of software updates, Xiaomi is reluctant to provide information on the Chinese website. At the time of testing, the Pad 8 Pro was running fairly up-to-date security patches from October 2025.

The imported device with a Chinese ROM can be expected to receive three to four years of security patches.

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: HyperOS 3 interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: HyperOS 3 interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: HyperOS 3 interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: HyperOS 3 interface

Sustainability

Xiaomi uses outer packaging without plastic for its tablet. Some of the accessories are covered with a paper film. The company does not provide any information on reparability and CO2 footprint, nor whether and how many recycled materials are used.

Communication and GNSS: Android tablet with Wi-Fi 7 but no 5G

The Pad 8 Pro is equipped with fast Wi-Fi 7 including MU-MIMO support and transmits at a high speed in our measurements. However, the Xiaomi tablet still has some room for improvement when sending and receiving in the 6 GHz 6E band. 

Although we determined transfer rates of over 1,600 Mbps at the peak in combination with the Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 router, the Pad 8 Pro shows weaknesses in the consistency of wireless transmission.

The Pad 8 Pro does not offer the option to use mobile data and does not support positioning via satellite systems.

Networking
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
719 (min: 546) MBit/s ∼73%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
922 (min: 807) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1148 (min: 966) MBit/s ∼63%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1338 (min: 1008) MBit/s ∼71%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
988 (min: 806) MBit/s ∼54%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1689 (min: 1523) MBit/s ∼90%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
970 (min: 946) MBit/s ∼98%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
981 (min: 963) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1827 (min: 1785) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1874 (min: 1677) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Wi-Fi 6E
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1011 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1484 (min: 1233) MBit/s ∼79%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
991 (min: 512) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
895 (min: 751) MBit/s ∼82%
Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
937 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼95%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1088 (min: 459) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1264 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼77%
Average of class Tablet
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
585 (min: 10.5) MBit/s ∼59%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
657 (min: 20.1) MBit/s ∼60%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1251 (min: 578) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1464 (min: 746) MBit/s ∼78%
05010015020025030035040045050055060065070075080085090095010001050110011501200125013001350140014501500155016001650Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1148 (966-1382)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz: Ø1338 (1008-1668)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø719 (546-934)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (512-1016)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø922 (807-1190)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (751-988)

Cameras: Pad 8 Pro supports HDR and 4K60 recording

Selfie with the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Selfie with the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

In terms of cameras, the Pad 8 Pro remains unchanged from its predecessor. There is a 32 MP ultra-wide-angle lens with an f/2.2 aperture and fixed focus on the front. Photos have decent sharpness, and the exposure is satisfactory as well.

The 50 MP main camera of the Pad 8 Pro is characterized by a higher resolution and phase detection autofocus. The Samsung JN1 sensor used ensures a solid dynamic range and detailed photos in good lighting conditions. There is also nothing much to criticize for a tablet in terms of colour fidelity.

If you want to use your tablet for taking photos of documents or presentations, the Xiaomi Pad is a very good choice. However, the 50 MP main camera quickly reaches its limits when zooming in, and a magnification of more than 3x is accompanied by a significant loss of quality.

Videos can at best be recorded in 4K Ultra HD at 60 fps.

1x
1x
2x
2x
5x
5x
6x (max)
6x (max)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: Camera interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: Camera interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: Camera interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: Camera interface
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: Camera interface

Image comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main cameraMain cameraLow light
orginal image
click to load images
ColorChecker
9.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
14.6 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
14.3 ∆E
7.3 ∆E
9.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
12.8 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
12.1 ∆E
14.4 ∆E
3.8 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
13.6 ∆E
5.3 ∆E
4.4 ∆E
11.3 ∆E
10.4 ∆E
2.4 ∆E
4.9 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: 9.32 ∆E min: 2.37 - max: 14.57 ∆E
ColorChecker
25.6 ∆E
39.6 ∆E
30.2 ∆E
28.7 ∆E
35.4 ∆E
47.6 ∆E
38.7 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
29.6 ∆E
24.7 ∆E
48.8 ∆E
50.7 ∆E
22.3 ∆E
34.9 ∆E
26.5 ∆E
47 ∆E
32.8 ∆E
34.1 ∆E
40.3 ∆E
45.9 ∆E
42.5 ∆E
33.2 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
13.5 ∆E
ColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro: 34.17 ∆E min: 13.46 - max: 50.74 ∆E

Accessories and Warranty: Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro comes with power adapter

The Pad 8 Pro comes with a 67 W fast-charging power adapter and a data or charging cable (USB Type-A to Type-C). Our loaner Trading Shenzhen adds an EU adapter for the charger to the scope of delivery of our Chinese version. 

Xiaomi also offers a stylish keyboard cover in the style of an Apple Magic Keyboard, and a Focus Pen Pro stylus for the Pad 8 Pro.

Our imported device has a warranty of 12 months. In the event of a warranty claim, Trading Shenzhen offers the option of sending the tablet to a German shipping address.

Input devices and operation: 11-inch tablet with fingerprint sensor

The 11.2-inch LC display of the Pad 8 Pro impresses with precise input and a high sampling rate of up to 1,080 Hz. This means that the touchscreen refreshes up to 1,080 times per second to retrieve input. Animations of the HyperOS 3 user interface also benefit from the high 144 Hz refresh rate.

The newly introduced Focus Pen Pro, weighing just 18 g, is available for handwritten notes and is said to enable very fine input with over 16,000 pressure levels. The latency is also said to be just 1 ms. Compared to the Focus Pen, the Pro model completely dispenses with physical buttons.

A fingerprint sensor in the on/off button on the left-hand side of the tablet unlocks the screen. This is easily accessible with the index finger and works reliably and quickly. 

Alternatively, the Pad 8 Pro offers less secure 2D facial recognition via the front camera.

Display: Pad 8 Pro relies on LCD

Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix

The 11.2-inch 144 Hz LCD panel of the Pad 8 Pro comes in a 3:2 format with a resolution of 3,200 x 2,136 pixels and a high 445 ppi pixel density. For comparison, an iPad Air 11 only manages 265 ppi.

The Xiaomi tablet is also in a different league when it comes to brightness. The peak brightness in our APL18 measurement is 778 cd/m². A triple certification by TÜV Rheinland is also available.

Due to the LCD technology used, we cannot detect any flickering even at low brightness, which makes the Pad 8 Pro suitable for PMW-sensitive users.

625
cd/m²
623
cd/m²
619
cd/m²
603
cd/m²
626
cd/m²
614
cd/m²
608
cd/m²
611
cd/m²
622
cd/m²
Distribution of brightness
tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3
Maximum: 626 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 616.8 cd/m² Minimum: 1.8 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 96 %
Center on Battery: 626 cd/m²
Contrast: 2087:1 (Black: 0.3 cd/m²)
ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.64 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}
ΔE Greyscale Calman: 3.1 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}
99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.2
CCT: 6746 K
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
LCD, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Lenovo Yoga Tab
LTPS, 3200x2000, 11.1"
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 2560x1600, 11"
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
IPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"
Screen
-5%
-3%
-5%
-10%
Brightness middle (cd/m²)
626
609
-3%
946
51%
508
-19%
776
24%
Brightness (cd/m²)
617
583
-6%
938
52%
497
-19%
750
22%
Brightness Distribution (%)
96
91
-5%
96
0%
93
-3%
91
-5%
Black Level * (cd/m²)
0.3
0.4
-33%
0.5
-67%
0.58
-93%
Contrast (:1)
2087
1523
-27%
1016
-51%
1338
-36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
1.64
1.81
-10%
3.5
-113%
1.13
31%
1.6
2%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
4.13
2.98
28%
5.5
-33%
2.49
40%
4.5
-9%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
3.1
2.5
19%
2.4
23%
1.7
45%
2.5
19%
Gamma
2.2 100%
1.934 114%
2.02 109%
2.173 101%
2.23 99%
CCT
6746 96%
6853 95%
6322 103%
6747 96%
6892 94%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8149 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Differences in individual colors and grayscale levels are barely noticeable in the "Original Pro" color profile. 

Our measurement with the X-rite i1Basic Pro 3 shows a low value of 0.3 cd/m² for the black level. The contrast ratio of the LCD is also very good at around 2,000:1.

ColorChecker (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
ColorChecker (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
Color Gamut (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: AdobeRGB)
Color Gamut (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: AdobeRGB)
Color Gamut (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: P3)
Color Gamut (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: P3)
Color Gamut (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
Color Gamut (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
Grayscale (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)
Saturation sweeps (Profile: Original Pro, Target color space: sRGB)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.6 ms rise
↘ 11.2 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
33.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 17.8 ms rise
↘ 15.7 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).

The Pad 8 Pro also impresses with good readability outdoors thanks to its decent brightness. 

If you want to avoid annoying reflections, you can optionally select the LCD option with a Nano Soft Light display technology, essentially a matte coating. On our test sample with a high-gloss screen, reflections on the glass surface are clearly visible.

When viewed flat, the display is true to color. The slight clouding that is typical of LC displays when the display is completely black is hardly annoying in everyday use.

Outdoor viewing
Outdoor viewing
Viewing angles

Performance: Pad 8 Pro impresses with Snapdragon 8 Elite

The Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC makes the Pad 8 Pro one of the fastest mid-range Android tablets currently available. In the Geekbench benchmarks, the Xiaomi tablet achieves very good scores, easily beating a Galaxy Tab S11 featuring the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+

The scores in Geekbench AI are also really good for a tablet with the Snapdragon 8 Elite.

Geekbench 6.5
Single-Core
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
3088 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 - 3228, n=28)
3048 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
3019 Points -2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2478 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1999 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points -36%
Average of class Tablet
  (185 - 4128, n=99, last 2 years)
1482 Points -52%
Multi-Core
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
11773 Points +23%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
9543 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7656 - 10401, n=28)
9175 Points -4%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
7787 Points -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6689 Points -30%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points -46%
Average of class Tablet
  (848 - 16544, n=99, last 2 years)
4744 Points -50%
Antutu v10 - Total Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
2870924 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2090799 - 3015111, n=20)
2660168 Points -7%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2396591 Points -17%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3, M3 9-Core GPU, 8192
2045290 Points -29%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1930622 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet
  (164396 - 3475590, n=72, last 2 years)
1199761 Points -58%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
Points -100%
PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
24387 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14366 - 27428, n=23)
20566 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (4622 - 27428, n=80, last 2 years)
12511 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
Points
CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1064 - 2674, n=18)
1887 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1123 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (227 - 2155, n=57, last 2 years)
978 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
Points
BaseMark OS II
Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12637 Points +12%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
11326 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8155 - 14066, n=19)
11251 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
10364 Points -8%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points -21%
Average of class Tablet
  (195 - 13159, n=66, last 2 years)
6018 Points -47%
System
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
17526 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
16271 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (10849 - 20776, n=19)
15801 Points -10%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12034 Points -31%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points -43%
Average of class Tablet
  (904 - 18343, n=66, last 2 years)
9286 Points -47%
Memory
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
14321 Points +3%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
13893 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
13578 Points -2%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7081 - 20572, n=19)
13523 Points -3%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points -7%
Average of class Tablet
  (401 - 17963, n=66, last 2 years)
7070 Points -49%
Graphics
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (35063 - 384996, n=19)
59181 Points +61%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
55053 Points +50%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
36723 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
33533 Points -9%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points -33%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57192, n=66, last 2 years)
16342 Points -55%
Web
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
2152 Points +18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2009 Points +10%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points +6%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (1202 - 2370, n=19)
1908 Points +5%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
1823 Points
Average of class Tablet
  (10 - 2370, n=66, last 2 years)
1525 Points -16%
UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
76843 Points +295%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
19438 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17623 Points -9%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8865 - 22767, n=17)
17519 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet
  (2597 - 76852, n=65, last 2 years)
16931 Points -13%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points -24%
AImark - Score v3.x
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (787 - 307528, n=16)
20815 Points +947%
Average of class Tablet
  (138 - 55794, n=55, last 2 years)
5939 Points +199%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
1988 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1463 Points -26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1192 Points -40%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
Points -100%
Geekbench AI
Single Precision NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
1143 Points +95%
Average of class Tablet
  (166 - 5295, n=27, last 2 years)
704 Points +20%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
587 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (246 - 676, n=9)
499 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
489 Points -17%
Half Precision NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
9067 Points +1426%
Average of class Tablet
  (154 - 41155, n=27, last 2 years)
3526 Points +494%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
594 Points
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (249 - 669, n=9)
502 Points -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
481 Points -19%
Quantized NPU 1.5
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12422 Points +848%
Average of class Tablet
  (88 - 57388, n=27, last 2 years)
5050 Points +285%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
1311 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1127 Points -14%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (508 - 1576, n=9)
1083 Points -17%
AI Benchmark - Score V6
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 840, 16384
17293 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+, Immortalis-G925 MC12, 12288
12632 Points -27%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (302 - 17293, n=15)
9205 Points -47%
Average of class Tablet
  (70.4 - 17293, n=27, last 2 years)
3894 Points -77%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points -79%

With the integrated graphics unit of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, the Pad 8 Pro is also very well positioned. The increase in GPU power compared to the Pad 7 Pro with a Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 is especially enormous. 

In the GFXBench 4K test, the Adreno 840 achieved a very good 43 fps despite the high display resolution.

3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6432 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6388 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5611 Points -13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5028 Points -22%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points -49%
3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
6405 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6353 Points -1%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5190 Points -19%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5043 Points -21%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points -50%
3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
26009 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23674 Points -9%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
19029 Points -27%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points -54%
3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11683 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11564 Points -1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8562 Points -27%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
5675 Points -51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points -55%
3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
11589 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11543 Points 0%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
8906 Points -23%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
8601 Points -26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points -55%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2596 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2491 Points -4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2088 Points -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1693 Points -35%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points -59%
3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
2643 Points
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2577 Points -2%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
2572 Points -3%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1672 Points -37%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points -58%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps 0%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
120 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
788 fps +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
778 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
592 fps -24%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
478 fps -39%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps -42%
GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +1%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +1%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
119 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -8%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%
GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
511 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
498 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
450 fps -10%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
332 fps -33%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps -46%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +17%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
103 fps
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99 fps -4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -42%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps -44%
GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
359 fps +11%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
323 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
238 fps -26%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
234 fps -28%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps -43%
GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
103 fps +45%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
71 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -15%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -15%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps -51%
GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
199 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
177 fps -11%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
159 fps -20%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
141 fps -29%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps -45%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
88 fps +66%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +13%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps +4%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
53 fps
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps -43%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
95 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
90 fps -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
77 fps -19%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
64.2 fps -32%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps -44%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
118 fps +49%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +3%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
79 fps
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -24%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -42%
GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
255 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
233 fps -9%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
188 fps -26%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps -43%
GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
43 fps
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -7%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
35.2 fps -18%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps -23%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -44%

The speed of the Pad 8 Pro is very good in the Chrome browser, although the tablet delivers mixed results in browser benchmarks.

Websites are opened quickly in everyday use and can be scrolled through smoothly.

Jetstream 2
2.0 Total Score
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (75.1 - 329, n=17)
223 Points
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
195.343 Points
Average of class Tablet (22.3 - 395, n=69, last 2 years)
150.2 Points
2.2 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
309.456 Points +16%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
303.591 Points +13%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)
267.483 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)
249.389 Points -7%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (113.6 - 307, n=7)
242 Points -10%
Average of class Tablet (61.3 - 579, n=31, last 2 years)
213 Points -20%
Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
34.4 runs/min +18%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)
29.2 runs/min
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (15.3 - 36.8, n=16)
24.6 runs/min -16%
Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 49.1, n=63, last 2 years)
14.4 runs/min -51%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min -58%
WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
234 Points +75%
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)
181 Points +35%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (102 - 255, n=17)
170.4 Points +27%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points +16%
Average of class Tablet (26 - 376, n=74, last 2 years)
137 Points +2%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)
134 Points
Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
92645 Points +21%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
89374 Points +17%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)
76383 Points
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)
75238 Points -1%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (25448 - 95506, n=24)
70725 Points -7%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points -14%
Average of class Tablet (763 - 138481, n=98, last 2 years)
42755 Points -44%
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (243 - 27101, n=83, last 2 years)
2600 ms * -449%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * -38%
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (383 - 1170, n=19)
553 ms * -17%
Lenovo Yoga Tab (Chrome 140)
531.2 ms * -12%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro (Chrome 141)
473.3 ms *
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 (Chrome 140)
392.3 ms * +17%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025 (Safari 18)
329.7 ms * +30%

* ... smaller is better

The Xiaomi tablet impresses with high data rates when it comes to storage performance. The UFS 4.1 standard delivers very good read and write rates.

Xiaomi Pad 8 ProLenovo Yoga TabSamsung Galaxy Tab S11Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAverage 512 GB UFS 4.1 FlashAverage of class Tablet
AndroBench 3-5
27%
-41%
-6%
5%
-43%
Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)
4083.3
3965.86
-3%
1694.53
-59%
3849.52
-6%
Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)
3252.32
3363.43
3%
1083.12
-67%
3283.91
1%
Random Read 4KB (MB/s)
332.87
421.72
27%
298.38
-10%
302.34
-9%
Random Write 4KB (MB/s)
383.77
698.11
82%
283.45
-26%
346.85
-10%

Games: An interesting tablet for gamers

To maximize the performance of the Adreno GPU in gaming, we used the GameBench software to see the exact frame rates for PUBG: Mobile and Genshin Impact from the PlayStore. It is definitely fun to play games with the large 144 Hz screen.

High-frame rate gaming beyond 100 fps is not possible in our test games, but even the demanding Geshin Impact is displayed smoothly and without any notable drops despite the 3.2K screen.

05101520253035404550556065707580859095Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; Genshin Impact: Ø59.6 (53-60)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; HD: Ø59.7 (50-61)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Ultra HD: Ø39.9 (39-41)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro; PUBG Mobile; Smoothest: Ø89.4 (79-99)

Emissions: Powerful tablet with little throttling

Temperature

Surface temperatures of the tablet's housing are very heterogeneous in our load scenario but are also at an uncritical level in the hot spot area.

A reduction in system performance as a result of pronounced waste heat in the SoC area is evident in the 3DMark stress tests, albeit at a very low level. 

We determined a throttling of less than 10% in 3DMark stress tests.

Max. Load
 36.3 °C
97 F
38.6 °C
101 F
35.5 °C
96 F
 
 33.2 °C
92 F
35.6 °C
96 F
31.4 °C
89 F
 
 31.7 °C
89 F
32.8 °C
91 F
30.4 °C
87 F
 
Maximum: 38.6 °C = 101 F
Average: 33.9 °C = 93 F
33.2 °C
92 F
37.6 °C
100 F
41.2 °C
106 F
31.5 °C
89 F
32.5 °C
91 F
36.9 °C
98 F
31.2 °C
88 F
33.2 °C
92 F
35.1 °C
95 F
Maximum: 41.2 °C = 106 F
Average: 34.7 °C = 94 F
Power Supply (max.)  41.6 °C = 107 F | Room Temperature 20 °C = 68 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-260
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.

3DMark Stress Tests

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.1 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % -5%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.5 % -15%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63.3 % -32%
Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
93.4 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % -4%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
82.1 % -12%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
76.4 % -18%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
66.7 % -29%
Solar Bay Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash
97.2 %
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 % -2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
85.9 % -12%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
81.1 % -17%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76 % -22%
Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 %
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.3 %
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
M3 9-Core GPU, M3, 128 GB NVMe
80 %
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Immortalis-G925 MC12, Dimensity 9400+, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79.4 %
0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.14.1: Ø36 (35.5-38)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø129.6 (127.5-137)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Adreno 840, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.17.2: Ø36.8 (36.4-37.4)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93)
Surface temperatures: Top
Surface temperatures: Top
Surface temperatures: Bottom
Surface temperatures: Bottom

Loudspeaker

One of the strengths of tablets in general is the space available for a promising audio system, and the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro is no exception. With its quad speakers, the mid-range tablet provides good sound with some bass, but the pink noise measurement shows wavy mids and highs.

A wired headphone solution is possible via the USB-C port. The Pad 8 Pro also supports Bluetooth version 5.4 including Auracast wirelessly.

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2046.541.12543.2403134.731.74036.540.45044.345.26329.431.48018.835.110021.746.11252153.91602059.420017.661.92501662.431516.967.140013.163.250017.266.263021.171.880021.372.9100018.177.4125016.279.3160017.877.8200016.373.8250012.874315012.567.5400011.963.3500012.570.5630012.676.3800012.474.31000012.3681250012.262.51600011.671.7SPL28.386.3N168.2median 16.2median 68.2Delta3.55.73340.227.530.322.831.626.331.836.440.921.130.720.738.519.643.812.650.816.359.716.359.113.163.212.4651063.210.869.212.473.811.976.111.678.412.480.811.679.811.378.611.977.812.175.613.175.613.174.613.778.813.379.813.674.413.765.814.269.824.689.50.683.7median 12.6median 74.61.17.6hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseXiaomi Pad 8 ProXiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 9.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 20% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%
Compared to all devices tested
» 11% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%

Energy management: Pad 8 Pro offers endurance

Energy consumption

Despite the slim build, the Pad 8 Pro houses a large battery with a capacity of 9,200 mAh. The battery can be charged at a maximum of 67 W, but wireless charging is not supported. Charging the tablet fully took around 1.5 hours while testing with the included power adapter.

The power consumption values are low for an 11-inch tablet. The energy consumption in idle mode is slightly higher than its predecessor at around 2 W.

Power Consumption
Off / Standbydarklight 0.2 / 0.3 Watt
Idledarkmidlight 1.5 / 2 / 2.6 Watt
Load midlight 6.7 / 15.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
9200 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab
8860 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
8400 mAh
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
 
Average of class Tablet
 
Power Consumption
15%
-68%
-41%
18%
11%
-45%
Idle Minimum * (Watt)
1.5
1.2
20%
2.57
-71%
1.6
-7%
0.75
50%
1.101 ?(0.42 - 3.8, n=23)
27%
Idle Average * (Watt)
2
1.4
30%
4.32
-116%
2.8
-40%
1.5
25%
1.672 ?(0.87 - 4.2, n=23)
16%
Idle Maximum * (Watt)
2.6
1.8
31%
4.36
-68%
4.7
-81%
1.56
40%
1.893 ?(0.94 - 4.8, n=23)
27%
Load Average * (Watt)
6.7
7.8
-16%
12.54
-87%
11.4
-70%
7.92
-18%
8.88 ?(5.8 - 13, n=18)
-33%
Load Maximum * (Watt)
15.7
13.9
11%
15.49
1%
16.8
-7%
16.5
-5%

* ... smaller is better

Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø10.1 (4.44-15.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.883 (1.757-2.58)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)

0123456789101112131415Tooltip
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø15.6 (15.5-15.7)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5)
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.883 (1.757-2.58)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46)

Battery life

The endurance of the Xiaomi tablet is at a very good level, lasting nearly 20.5 hours in our Wi-Fi browsing test at an adjusted display brightness of 150 cd/m². 

This means that the Pad 8 Pro lasts almost twice as long as an iPad Air 11.

Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 141)
20h 26min
Load (maximum brightness)
3h 31min
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
9200 mAh
Lenovo Yoga Tab
8860 mAh
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
8400 mAh
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
 mAh
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
8850 mAh
Battery runtime
-13%
-45%
-19%
-14%
WiFi v1.3 (h)
20.4
17.7
-13%
11.2
-45%
11.7
-43%
17.6
-14%
Load (h)
3.5
3.7
6%
Reader / Idle (h)
25.6
H.264 (h)
12.9

Notebookcheck's overall impressions of the Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro

The Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro offers powerful features and fantastic runtimes, packaged in a stylish design. If you don't want to wait for a global version, you can get the mid-range tablet as an import device at an attractive price. 

Thanks to the strong increase in performance, the Pad 8 Pro makes a significant leap in our rating and therefore also receives our Top Rated award.

If you like a bigger screen, you should definitely take a look at our review of the OnePlus Pad 3.

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro in review

Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro - 11/21/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich

Chassis
88 / 98 → 89%
Keyboard
70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device
94%
Connectivity
47 / 69 → 68%
Weight
83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery
92%
Display
87%
Games Performance
56 / 65 → 86%
Application Performance
83 / 92 → 90%
AI Performance
39%
Temperature
92%
Noise
100%
Audio
83 / 91 → 91%
Camera
66 / 90 → 73%
Average
68%
89%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 Emissions
No Data
Materials
40%
Packaging
75%
Power Use
92.4%
Repairability
30%
Software Updates
61.7%
Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 49.9%

Potential alternatives in comparison

Image
Model / Review
Price
Weight
Drive
Display
1.
89.2%
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 840 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $329.99
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
2. $539.50
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. $311.52
Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...
List Price: 600€
485 g512 GB UFS 4.1 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
LCD
2.
88.2%
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Lenovo Yoga Tab
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $279.99
Lenovo Idea Tab Pro with Goo...
2. $232.00
Lenovo Yoga 11 MTK 8185 4/128
3. $179.99
Lenovo Idea Tab - College Ta...
List Price: 499€
458 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.10"
3200x2000
340 PPI
LTPS
3.
88.2%
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11
Mediatek Dimensity 9400+ ⎘
ARM Immortalis-G925 MC12 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 128 GB 
Amazon:
1. $709.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...
2. $649.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 128 G...
3. $709.99
Samsung Galaxy Tab S11 256 G...
List Price: 899€
469 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.00"
2560x1600
274 PPI
OLED - Dynamic AMOLED 2X
4.
87.4%
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple iPad Air 11 2025
Apple M3 ⎘
Apple M3 9-Core GPU ⎘
8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMe
Amazon: $449.00
List Price: 699€
460 g128 GB NVMe10.86"
2360x1640
265 PPI
IPS
5.
86.5%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $649.99
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
2. $539.50
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
3. $489.50
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...
List Price: 450€
500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"
3200x2136
344 PPI
IPS

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

static version load dynamic
Loading Comments
Comment on this article
Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Reviews > Xiaomi Pad 8 Pro Review: An excellent Snapdragon 8 Elite tablet for a low price
Marcus Herbrich, 2025-11-24 (Update: 2025-11-24)