Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000

► remove from comparison

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 was the fastest and most expensive mobile Core 2 CPU at the time of announcement. It features a higher power consumption of 44 W compared to other Core 2 Duo processors. Later the X9100 substituted the X9000 as fastest dual core CPU and the P9700 offered the same performance of the X9000 at only 25 Watt TDP (and a lower price tag).

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300

► remove from comparison

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100

► remove from comparison Intel X9100

The Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 is the fastest dual-core CPU of the Core 2 series for laptops. As all Core 2 Extreme CPUs it offers an unlocked multiplicator and is therefore easy to overclock (usually in the BIOS). The X9100 was later substituted by the Core 2 Duo T9900 with the same clock rate but a cheaper price tag. The T9900 offers a better TDP of 35 Watt but has a fixed multiplicator (only drawback). Futhermore, the T9900 offers some newer features as Turbo Boost and C1E state.

Due to the high clock rate of 3 GHz, the Core 2 Extreme X9100 offers enough performance for all games and applications in 2009 and possibly also 2010. In most applications (escpecially most games), it is faster than the low clocked Core 2 Quad CPUs (like Q9000, QX9300). Modern Core i7 CPUs with high Turbo frequencies are the only CPUs that are faster than the X9100 on average.

 

The X9100 uses a Penryn core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo X9100 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins.

 

ModelIntel Core 2 Extreme X9000Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100
SeriesIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Extreme
CodenamePenrynPenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Extreme Penryn
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX93002.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X91003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 « 2.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 « 2.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X91003.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X90002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX93002.53 GHz4 / 4 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 « 3.06 GHz2 / 2 cores
Intel Core 2 Extreme X90002.8 GHz2 / 2 cores
Clock2800 MHz2530 MHz3060 MHz
FSB80010661066
L1 Cache128 KB256 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB12 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 24 / 42 / 2
TDP44 Watt45 Watt44 Watt
Transistors410 Million820 Million410 Million
Technology45 nm, 1.0-1.275V45 nm, 1.05-1.175V45 nm
Die Size107 mm2214 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C100 °C105 °C
SocketPGA478PGA478Socket P
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel VT-x, Enhanced SpeedStep, Intel 64, Execute Disable BitSSE4.1, Virtualization Technology, Execute Disable Bit, Enhanced Speedstep, 64 Bit, Trusted Execution Technology
Architecturex86x86x86
$851 U.S.$1038 U.S.$851 U.S.
Announced
Manufacturerark.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 QX9300 +
2.6 Points (3%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
min: 3070     avg: 3189     median: 3072 (19%)     max: 3425 Points
min: 2959     avg: 3131     median: 3113.5 (19%)     max: 3338 Points
min: 3341     avg: 3834     median: 3833.5 (23%)     max: 4326 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
min: 5818     avg: 6084     median: 5843 (4%)     max: 6590 Points
min: 10716     avg: 10914     median: 10881.5 (8%)     max: 11176 Points
min: 6075     avg: 7299     median: 7440 (5%)     max: 8382 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
29 s (6%)
15.7 s (3%)
46 s (9%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2532     avg: 2550     median: 2549 (5%)     max: 2570 Points
min: 3523     avg: 3750     median: 3780 (8%)     max: 3915 Points
min: 2499     avg: 2832     median: 2810 (6%)     max: 3188 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16     avg: 16.7     median: 16.8 (4%)     max: 17 s
18 s (4%)
13.4 s (3%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 40     avg: 40.1     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.17 s
44 s (2%)
33.6 s (1%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1092     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (5%)     max: 1138 s
1159 s (5%)
906 s (4%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 22914     avg: 24345     median: 24344.5 (12%)     max: 25775 MIPS
46468 MIPS (22%)
32472 MIPS (15%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 18932     avg: 19711     median: 19711 (15%)     max: 20490 MFLOPS
34653 MFLOPS (27%)
24450 MFLOPS (19%)
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 7036     avg: 7392     median: 7470 (15%)     max: 7669 Points
min: 7792     avg: 8239     median: 8160 (17%)     max: 8764 Points
min: 7203     avg: 7575     median: 7575 (16%)     max: 7947 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 X9000 +
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5613 Points (5%)
min: 10188     avg: 10370     median: 10339 (9%)     max: 10548 Points
min: 6208     avg: 6433     median: 6433 (6%)     max: 6658 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 → 136% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 → 112% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.26
log 27. 06:23:57

#0 checking url part for id 378 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 418 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 394 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 25 Apr 2024 05:38:32 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#5 composed specs +0.012s ... 0.013s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 378 +0.003s ... 0.017s

#8 got single benchmarks 378 +0.019s ... 0.036s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 418 +0.003s ... 0.039s

#10 got single benchmarks 418 +0.033s ... 0.072s

#11 getting avg benchmarks for device 394 +0.003s ... 0.074s

#12 got single benchmarks 394 +0.022s ... 0.096s

#13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.127s ... 0.224s

#15 return log +0s ... 0.224s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)