Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 vs Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000

► remove

The Core 2 Extreme X9000 was the fastest and most expensive mobile Core 2 CPU at the time of announcement. It features a higher power consumption of 44 W compared to other Core 2 Duo processors. Later the X9100 substituted the X9000 as fastest dual core CPU and the P9700 offered the same performance of the X9000 at only 25 Watt TDP (and a lower price tag).

Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300

► remove

Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300
Intel Core 2 ExtremeIntel Core 2 Extreme
PenrynPenryn
: Core 2 Extreme Penryn
Intel Core 2 Extreme QX93002530 MHz4 / 4
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 (compare)3060 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Extreme X90002800 MHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Extreme QX93002530 MHz4 / 4
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9100 (compare)3060 MHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Extreme X90002800 MHz2 / 2
2800 MHz2530 MHz
8001066
128 KB256 KB
6 MB12 MB
2 / 24 / 4
44 45
410 820
45 1.0-1.275V45 1.05-1.175V
107 mm2214 mm2
105 °C100 °C
PGA478PGA478
Virtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitIntel VT-x, Enhanced SpeedStep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
$851 U.S.$1038 U.S.
Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000

Cinebench R11.5 - CPU Multi 64Bit
2.6 Points (11%)
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Single 32Bit
min: 3070     avg: 3189     median: 3072 (37%)     max: 3425 Points
min: 2959     avg: 3131     median: 3113.5 (37%)     max: 3338 Points
Cinebench R10 - Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
min: 5818     avg: 6083.7     median: 5843 (12%)     max: 6590 Points
min: 10716     avg: 10913.8     median: 10881.5 (22%)     max: 11176 Points
wPrime 2.0x - 32m *
29 seconds (6%)
15.7 seconds (3%)
3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 2532     avg: 2552     median: 2554 (20%)     max: 2570 Points
min: 3523     avg: 3749.8     median: 3780 (30%)     max: 3915 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 1280x800
2544 Points (89%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 16     avg: 16.7     median: 16.8 (4%)     max: 17 Seconds
18 Seconds (4%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 40     avg: 40.1     median: 40 (2%)     max: 40.17 Seconds
44 Seconds (2%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1092     avg: 1115     median: 1115 (5%)     max: 1138 Seconds
1159 Seconds (5%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 22914     avg: 24344.5     median: 24344.5 (12%)     max: 25775 MIPS
46468 MIPS (22%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 18932     avg: 19711     median: 19711 (15%)     max: 20490 MFLOPS
34653 MFLOPS (27%)
PCMark 05 - Standard 1024x768
min: 7036     avg: 7391.7     median: 7470 (47%)     max: 7669 Points
min: 7792     avg: 8238.7     median: 8160 (51%)     max: 8764 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - CPU
5.6 Points (80%)
3DMark Vantage - P CPU no PhysX 1280x1024
5613 Points (9%)
min: 10188     avg: 10369.6     median: 10339 (17%)     max: 10548 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme X9000 → 100%

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Extreme QX9300 → 133%

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2018, 2017
v1.8
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)