Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Xeon W-10855M vs Intel Core i7-6700K

Intel Xeon W-10855M

► remove from comparison

The Intel Xeon W-10855M is a high-end processor for laptops with six cores based on the Comet Lake architecture (CML-H, 4th generation of Skylake). The processor clocks at between 2.8 and 4.8 GHz (probably 4.4 GHz with 6 cores) and can execute up to twelve threads simultaneously thanks to Hyper-Threading. The processor is still manufactured in the old 14nm (14nm++) process. 

The Comet Lake architecture is similar to Coffee Lake and offers the same features and is produced in the same 14nm process. Other than the improved clock rates, the memory controller now also supports faster DDR4-2933 RAM. More information on Comet Lake and all the models and articles on it can be found here.

The Intel Xeon W-10855M supports the management features vPro, TXT and SIPP and is the professional version of the Core i7-10850H with slightly higher clock speeds (+100 MHz base speed). 

Performance

The performance of the Xeon W-10855M should be similar to the old top model Core i7-8950H (6 cores, 2.9 - 4.8 GHz). Thanks to the 6 cores and high Turbo speeds, even demanding applications should run fine on the CPU. However, long term performance is always depending on the laptop cooling system and system configuration.

Graphics

The integrated Intel UHD Graphics P630 iGPU is supposed to offer a similar performance as the UHD630 in the Core i7-9750H. As a  low-end solution it will only run current games smoothly at reduced details - if at all.

Power Consumption

Intel specifies the TDP with 45 watts and therefore the i7 is only suited for big laptops with good cooling solutions. Using cTDP-down, the CPU can also be configured to 35 Watt resulting in a reduced performance.

Intel Core i7-6700K

► remove from comparison Intel 6700K

The Intel Core i7-6700K is a high-end quad-core desktop processor based on the Skylake architecture, which was announced in August 2015. The CPU, which is manufactured in a 14 nm process, runs at 4.0 up to 4.2 GHz (2 cores: 4.0 GHz, 3 cores: 4.0 GHz, 4 cores: 4.0 GHz) and can execute up to 8 threads simultaneously thanks to Hyperthreading. Being a so called "K"-model, the Core i7-6700K has a free multiplier and can be easily overclocked. 

Performance

Even though the Core i7-6700K has a slightly lower clock than the old i7-4790K (4.0 GHz - 4.4 GHz), the performance is slightly better compared to the Haswell predecessor. Depending on the application, the per-MHz performance was increased by roughly 5-10 %. Even the most demanding applications and games are no problem for the high-end CPU.

Graphics

Graphics are handled by the integrated Intel HD Graphics 530 with 24 EUs (Execution Units), which is clocked at 350 - 1150 MHz. Compared to the HD Graphics 4600 (Haswell, 20 EUs), the performance is increased by around 25 percent. The overall GPU performance is still low-end, so modern games can, if at all, only be played smoothly with low settings. 

Power Consumption

The TDP was slightly raised from 88 to 91 Watts compared to the predecessor.

ModelIntel Xeon W-10855MIntel Core i7-6700K
CodenameComet Lake-HSkylake
SeriesIntel Comet LakeIntel Core i7 (Desktop)
Series: Core i7 (Desktop) Skylake
Intel Core i9-10980HK compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10885M compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10885H compare2.4 - 5.3 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i9-10880H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10875H compare2.3 - 5.1 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10870H compare2.2 - 5 GHz8 / 16 cores16 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10850H compare2.7 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Xeon W-10855M « 2.8 - 5.1 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i7-10750H compare2.6 - 5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10500H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz6 / 12 cores12 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10400H compare2.6 - 4.6 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10300H compare2.5 - 4.5 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i5-10200H compare2.4 - 4.1 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700K « 4 - 4.2 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700 compare3.4 - 4 GHz4 / 8 cores8 MB L3
Intel Core i7-6700T compare2.8 - 3.6 GHz4 / 8 cores6 MB L3
Clock2800 - 5100 MHz4000 - 4200 MHz
L1 Cache384 KB256 KB
L2 Cache1.5 MB1 MB
L3 Cache12 MB8 MB
Cores / Threads6 / 124 / 8
TDP45 Watt91 Watt
Technology14 nm14 nm
SocketFCBGA1440FCLGA1151
FeaturesDual-Channel DDR4 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, Quick Sync, Virtualization, AES-NIDDR3(L)-1600/DDR4-2133 Memory Controller, HyperThreading, AVX, AVX2, AES-NI, TSX-NI, Quick Sync, Virtualization, vPro
iGPUIntel UHD Graphics P630 (350 MHz)Intel HD Graphics 530 (350 - 1150 MHz)
Architecturex86x86
Announced
$339 U.S.
Manufacturerark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 6700K +
min: 865     avg: 881     median: 880 (6%)     max: 910 Points
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 6700K +
min: 160     avg: 174.4     median: 177.5 (49%)     max: 182 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8.55     avg: 9.6     median: 9.7 (12%)     max: 10.2 Points
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
100%
1 6700K +
min: 1.72     avg: 2     median: 2 (47%)     max: 2.16 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 6700K +
min: 6434     avg: 6980     median: 6531 (39%)     max: 8845 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 6700K +
min: 19705     avg: 24305     median: 25817 (19%)     max: 26150 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
100%
1 6700K +
min: 33740     avg: 34944     median: 34593 (22%)     max: 36500 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8600     avg: 8758     median: 8624 (11%)     max: 9050 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 178     avg: 225.4     median: 205.9 (2%)     max: 275 s
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 5.726     avg: 7.2     median: 6.7 (1%)     max: 8.94 s
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
100%
1 6700K +
5877 Points (9%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
100%
1 6700K +
min: 52.5     avg: 54.4     median: 54.6 (1%)     max: 55.3 fps
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
100%
1 6700K +
min: 194.2     avg: 204.7     median: 204.8 (5%)     max: 210.2 fps
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
100%
1 6700K +
min: 0.203     avg: 0.4     median: 0.5 (13%)     max: 0.507 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
100%
1 6700K +
min: 0.324     avg: 0.7     median: 0.7 (13%)     max: 0.848 GB/s
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
100%
1 6700K +
min: 1.7     avg: 3.8     median: 4.4 (11%)     max: 4.9 GB/s
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8973     avg: 9037     median: 9037 (19%)     max: 9101 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8.787     avg: 9     median: 9 (2%)     max: 9.392 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 19.7     avg: 20.3     median: 20.3 (1%)     max: 20.83 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 463.8     avg: 479     median: 479.7 (2%)     max: 498.3 s
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
100%
1 6700K +
min: 31997     avg: 32843     median: 32153 (25%)     max: 34379 Points
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 10341     avg: 11161     median: 11228 (28%)     max: 11761 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 59904     avg: 61163     median: 61287.5 (50%)     max: 62149 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 59247     avg: 60685     median: 61091 (50%)     max: 62096 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 60945     avg: 61859     median: 62114 (50%)     max: 62262 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 8328     avg: 9165     median: 9272 (23%)     max: 9702 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
100%
1 6700K +
min: 12430     avg: 12822     median: 12870.5 (23%)     max: 13182 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
1296 Points (49%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
6231 Points (11%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
16365 Points (29%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
4225 Points (55%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 17030     avg: 17122     median: 17122 (27%)     max: 17214 Points
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 6700K +
min: 4436     avg: 4598     median: 4598 (69%)     max: 4760 Points
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 795     avg: 800     median: 800 (1%)     max: 805 ms
Sunspider - Sunspider 1.0 Total Score *
100%
1 6700K +
min: 76.8     avg: 119.5     median: 119.5 (1%)     max: 162.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
100%
1 6700K +
min: 37135     avg: 40412     median: 40411.5 (30%)     max: 43688 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Xeon W-10855M → 0% n=0

Average Benchmarks Intel Core i7-6700K → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 06. 23:57:29

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12207 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 6949 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759787849s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sat, 04 Oct 2025 05:18:30 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12207 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 12207 +0.004s ... 0.008s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 6949 +0.001s ... 0.01s

#10 got single benchmarks 6949 +0.012s ... 0.022s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.022s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.016s ... 0.037s

#13 return log +0.003s ... 0.04s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)