Vivo X20 Plus
Secondary Camera: 12 MPix
Average of 2 scores (from 5 reviews)
Reviews for the Vivo X20 Plus
Source: Yugatech Archive.org version
The Vivo X20A is a worthy device for those who plan to buy a premium mid-range smartphone. It has a vibrant display, above average performing processor and GPU, decent camera performance, great face unlock implementation and a long-lasting battery. One minor issue that we had is that it still carries a microUSB port, but that’s not much of a deal breaker to most. Other than that, this phone gets our praise for being well-built and having good overall features and performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 06/29/2018
Source: DxOMark Archive.org version
The Vivo X20 Plus is a very capable all-rounder for photography, producing consistently good results both outdoors and indoors for stills and video alike. Exposures are generally good and hold up well against some of the best premium devices; further, the X20 Plus offers a good compromise between noise and texture, with detailed shots in bright light and smooth images in low light. Autofocus is fast and accurate, and white balance is among some of the most neutral we’ve seen. There’s some room for improvement, as we’d like to see more saturated color, better detail in the highlights in HDR shots, and a tele-lens for optical zoom shots — but that aside, the Vivo X20 Plus is an excellent choice for the smartphone photography enthusiast.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/27/2018
Source: AndroidWorld.it IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 03/09/2018
Rating: Total score: 75% price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi IT→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 03/03/2018
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 60% display: 80% mobility: 89% workmanship: 79%
Source: The Gioididong VN→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Impressive fingerprint sensor; nice design; metal case; good hardware; high autonomy; decent cameras.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 01/28/2018
Qualcomm Adreno 220: Integrated OpenGL ES 2.0 graphics card for Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 SoCs.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
S3 MSM8660: Dual Core SoC for Smartphones clocked at up to 1.7 GHz.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
Only a few smartphones have larger screens.
Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.
Only few smartphones are more lightweight than this.
72.5%: This rating is bad. Most notebooks are better rated. This is not a recommendation for purchase.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.