Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core Ultra 9 285 vs Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

► remove from comparison Intel Ultra 9 285

The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 is an Arrow Lake-based desktop processor with 24 cores in two clusters. The 8 performance cores clock at up to 5.6 GHz and the 16 smaller efficiency cores at up to 4.6 GHz.

Due to the lower clock rate and the low TDP, the CPU performance is slightly below the Core Ultra 9 285K is positioned.

The Arrow Lake-S chips are composed of several chiplets. The CPU part is manufactured at TSMC in the modern N3B (3nm) process, the GPU also comes from TSMC in the N5P process. The SoC and I/O tile are manufactured in the TSMC N6 process. The base tile is manufactured by Intel in the 22nm process and carries the individual chiplets thanks to Fovero's 3D packaging.

The TDP is specified at 65 watts (long-term) to 182 watts (Turbo).

Intel Core Ultra 5 245K

► remove from comparison
show full text
ModelIntel Core Ultra 9 285Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
CodenameArrow Lake-SArrow Lake-S
SeriesIntel Arrow LakeIntel Arrow Lake
Series: Arrow Lake Arrow Lake-S
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K compare3.2 - 5.7 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285 « 1.9 - 5.6 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K3.6 - 5.2 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare3 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare3.4 - 5 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz10 / 10 cores20 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K compare3.2 - 5.7 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 9 2851.9 - 5.6 GHz24 / 24 cores36 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K « 3.6 - 5.2 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 245 compare3 - 5.1 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 235 compare3.4 - 5 GHz14 / 14 cores24 MB L3
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F compare3.3 - 4.9 GHz10 / 10 cores20 MB L3
Clock1900 - 5600 MHz3600 - 5200 MHz
L2 Cache39.3 MB26 MB
L3 Cache36 MB24 MB
Cores / Threads24 / 24
8 x 5.6 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
16 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core		14 / 14
6 x 5.2 GHz Intel Lion Cove P-core
8 x 4.6 GHz Intel Skymont E-core
TDP65 Watt125 Watt
TDP Turbo PL2182 Watt159 Watt
Technology3 nm
max. Temp.105 °C
SocketLGA1851
iGPUIntel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 2000 MHz)Intel Graphics 4-Core iGPU (Arc) ( - 1900 MHz)
NPU / AI13 TOPS INT813 TOPS INT8
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Manufacturerwww.intel.comark.intel.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - CB R15 + R20 + 7-Zip + X265 + Blender + 3DM11 CPU - Ultra 5 245K
45 pt (75%)
AMD E1-2100
2.32 -95%
...
AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 390
43.4 -4%
Intel Core i9-12900K
43.7 -3%
Intel Core Ultra 5 235
43.8 -3%
AMD Ryzen 9 7845HX
44.1 -2%
Intel Core i5-14600K
44.1 -2%
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X
44.1 -2%
Intel Core i7-14700HX
44.3 -2%
AMD Ryzen 7 7700
44.3 -2%
Intel Core i7-14700
44.8 0%
Intel Core Ultra 5 245K
45
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
45.1 0%
Intel Core i9-13950HX
45.1 0%
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395
45.4 1%
AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX
45.5 1%
Intel Core i9-13980HX
46 2%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
46.1 2%
Intel Core i7-13700K
46.1 2%
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
46.1 2%
Intel Core i9-14900HX
46.6 4%
...
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7995WX
60.1 34%
0%
100%
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Single Core
132 Points (74%)
Cinebench 2024 - Cinebench 2024 CPU Multi Core
1472 Points (27%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Multi Core
25066 Points (23%)
Cinebench R23 - Cinebench R23 Single Core
2132 Points (90%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)
820 Points (89%)
Cinebench R20 - Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)
9752 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
3850 Points (24%)
Cinebench R15 - Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64 Bit
322 Points (89%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64 Bit
47.6 Points (62%)
Cinebench R11.5 - Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64 Bit
3.9 Points (91%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
11681 Points (71%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
91572 Points (66%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (64bit)
144770 Points (92%)
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (64bit)
18079 Points (22%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
77.7 s (1%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
3 s (1%)
WinRAR - WinRAR 4.0
10521 Points (17%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Multi Thread 4 runs
77921 MIPS (45%)
7-Zip 18.03 - 7-Zip 18.03 Single Thread 4 runs
6477 MIPS (76%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 2
216.5 fps (5%)
X264 HD Benchmark 4.0 - x264 Pass 1
388.5 fps (10%)
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 - HWBOT x265 4k Preset
29.6 fps (52%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Serpent
1.5 GB/s (44%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt Twofish
3 GB/s (52%)
TrueCrypt - TrueCrypt AES
16.4 GB/s (43%)
Blender - Blender 3.3 Classroom CPU *
216 Seconds (3%)
Blender - Blender 2.79 BMW27 CPU *
136 Seconds (1%)
R Benchmark 2.5 - R Benchmark 2.5 *
min: 0.4058     avg: 0.4     median: 0.4 (9%)     max: 0.4086 sec
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
19396 Points (41%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
7.3 s (2%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
16 s (1%)
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
116115 Points (89%)
3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physics
27022 Points (67%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics
116788 Points (95%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics
116394 Points (94%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
120552 Points (97%)
3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics
25285 Points (64%)
3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics
38202 Points (68%)
3DMark - 3DMark Time Spy CPU
15010 Points (63%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
3061 Points (74%)
3040 Points (74%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
19926 Points (77%)
17575 Points (68%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
2224 Points (84%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
17760 Points (32%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
2180 Points (9%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
17938 Points (57%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
9171 Points (92%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
65981 Points (65%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
425 ms (0%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
318 Points (87%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
346 Points (62%)
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
2245 Points (84%)
Power Consumption - Prime95 Power Consumption - external Monitor *
263 Watt (45%)
Power Consumption - Cinebench R15 Multi Power Consumption - external Monitor *
244 Watt (45%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption - external Monitor *
93.8 Watt (62%)
Power Consumption - Power Efficiency - Cinebench R15 Multi external Monitor
15.8 Points per Watt (12%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core Ultra 5 245K → 0% n=0

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 08. 03:04:04

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 18617 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 18014 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1759885444s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 07 Oct 2025 05:18:31 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.003s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.003s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 18617 +0s ... 0.003s

#8 got single benchmarks 18617 +0.003s ... 0.007s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 18014 +0.004s ... 0.011s

#10 got single benchmarks 18014 +0.005s ... 0.016s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.016s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.021s ... 0.037s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.001s ... 0.038s

#14 min, max, avg, median took s +0.008s ... 0.046s

#15 return log +0.008s ... 0.054s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)