TP-Link Neffos C9A
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 5 MPix
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 4 reviews)
Reviews for the TP-Link Neffos C9A
TP-Link directs its Neffos C9A at users with low expectations and demands from a smartphone. Users will need patience using this affordable Android device as the system can be a little slow. Find out which other characteristics the TP-Link Neffos C9A has to offer in our review.
Source: Tech Stage DE→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2018
Source: Tuexperto ES→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; compact size; light weight; nice display; long battery life. Negative: Average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/29/2018
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Elegant design; great connectivity; fast system; good price. Negative: Average performance; poor display.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/23/2018
Source: Android.com.pl PL→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2018
Rating: Total score: 66% performance: 50% display: 70% mobility: 70%
Comment
Imagination PowerVR GE8100: Integrated graphics card for entry level ARM SoCs. Smallest variant of the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) with a peak fillrate of only one pixel/clock.
These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
MT6739: Entry level quad core soc (4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.5 GHz) with an integrated LTE modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), Wifi and PowerVR GE8100 GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
5.45":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.72.9%: This rating is poor. More than three quarters of the models are rated better. That is rather not a purchase recommendation. Even if verbal ratings in this area do not sound that bad ("sufficient" or "satisfactory"), they are usually euphemisms that disguise a classification as a below-average laptop.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.