Wiko Harry 2

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Wiko Harry 2

Análise ao Wiko Harry 2, acessível e funcional
Source: Android Geek PT→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Good price; nice display. Negative: Low performance.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/28/2019

40% Test Du Wiko Harry 2 : Même Le Choixpeau Magique Ne Sait Pas Où Le Mettre
Source: Frandroid FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/30/2018
Rating: Total score: 40% performance: 40% display: 60% mobility: 50% workmanship: 50%

Test du Wiko Harry 2 : globalement, une bonne évolution
Source: Top for Phone FR→EN Archive.org version
Positive: Low price; nice system; decent battery life. Negative: Poor display.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/05/2019

Comment

Imagination PowerVR GE8100: Integrated graphics card for entry level ARM SoCs. Smallest variant of the Series8XE series of GPUs (GE8xx0) with a peak fillrate of only one pixel/clock.

These graphics cards are not suited for Windows 3D games. Office and Internet surfing however is possible.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

MT6739: Entry level quad core soc (4x Cortex-A53 at up to 1.5 GHz) with an integrated LTE modem (Cat. 4 DL / Cat 5 UL), Wifi and PowerVR GE8100 GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

5.45":

It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.

Wiko:

Wiko SAS was founded as a French smartphone manufacturer in 2011. Since 2014, the Chinese technology group Tinno Mobile has owned a majority of Wiko. They produce in China. The company has already reached a considerable market share in the French market in early years and expanded to Europe and Africa later on. Nevertheless, the world market share is low.

Reviews are only available since 2014, that is since the first international expansion. Recently, the number of reviews has increased. The ratings are average (as of 2016).

59.4%: Such a poor rating is rare. There are only a few notebooks that were rated even worse. The rating websites do not give a purchase recommendation here.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU