Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

Intel Core 2 Duo T9800

► remove from comparison Intel T9800

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 was the top dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. Later it was topped by the Core 2 Duo T9900 / X9100. Still the T9800 is a high end laptop CPU which is well suited for single and dual threaded applications.

Due to the high clock speed, the T9800 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. On average, only faster dual cores (like the T9900 or fast Core i7) or Core i7 quad cores can be faster than the T9800.

The T9800 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically as low as 800 MHz to save power (in idle mode).

The Core 2 Duo T9800 can be used in a Socket P socket with 479 pins: Socket P / Micro Flip-Chip Pin Grid Array (Micro-FCPGA) requires 479-pin surface mount Zero Insertion Force (ZIF) socket (mPGA479M socket) or Micro Flip-Chip Ball Grid Array (Micro-FCBGA) for surface mount (479-ball)

Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

► remove from comparison Intel T9550

The Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 was the middle class dual core CPU for laptops at the time of introduction. It is similar to the Core 2 Duo P9600 except for the higher TDP of 35 versus 25 Watt.

Due to the relatively high clock speed and 6MB Level 2 cache, the T9550 offers enough performance for demanding games (in 2009) and applications. 

The T9550 uses a Penryn (Montevina Update) core that features 2 integer units, 1 floating point unit, 1 load unit, and 1 store unit in a 14-stages long pipeline. Due to the Wide Dynamic Execution Technology, the core is able to simultaneously execute up to four instructions.

The integrated Enhanced Speedstep is able to downclock the core dynamically to save power (in idle mode).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T9800Intel Core 2 Duo T9550
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenamePenrynPenryn
Series: Core 2 Duo Penryn
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9900 compare3.06 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T98002.92 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9700 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 compare2.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9600 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T95502.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9500 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9600 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P9500 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9400 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8800 compare2.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T9300 compare2.5 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8700 compare2.53 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9400 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8600 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP9300 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P8400 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7570 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7550 compare2.26 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6770 compare2.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9600 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7450 compare2.13 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6670 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6600 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T8100 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7370 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo P7350 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6570 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6500 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9400 compare1.86 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9380 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T6400 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SL9300 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9600 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9400 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU7300 compare1.3 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SU9300 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2920 MHz2660 MHz
FSB10661066
L1 Cache128 KB128 KB
L2 Cache6 MB6 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt35 Watt
Transistors410 Million410 Million
45 nm, 1-1.25 V45 nm, 1.05-1.212V
Die Size107 mm2107 mm2
max. Temp.105 °C105 °C
SocketSocket P (BGA479, PGA478)BGA479, PGA478
FeaturesVirtualization (VT-x), Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization, Trusted Execution, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep (up to C6), ExBit, SSE4.1
Architecturex86x86
$530 U.S.$316 U.S.
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T9800Intel Core 2 Duo T9550

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
3633 Points (32%)
min: 2911     avg: 2958     median: 2966 (26%)     max: 3001 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
6839 Points (9%)
min: 5418     avg: 5530     median: 5577 (8%)     max: 5615 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 1024m *
100%
1 T9550 +
922 s (11%)
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
100%
1 T9550 +
29 s (6%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
2626 Points (6%)
min: 2347     avg: 2384     median: 2385 (5%)     max: 2417 Points
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
15 s (3%)
min: 16     avg: 17     median: 17 (4%)     max: 17.91 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
38 s (2%)
min: 40     avg: 41.6     median: 42 (2%)     max: 42.84 s
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1008 s (4%)
min: 1059     avg: 1105     median: 1123 (5%)     max: 1132 s
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
26991 MIPS (13%)
min: 6820     avg: 17433     median: 20774 (10%)     max: 24706 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
20305 MFLOPS (16%)
min: 5870     avg: 14981     median: 19516 (15%)     max: 19556 MFLOPS
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
6618 Points (42%)
min: 6414     avg: 6553     median: 6619 (42%)     max: 6625 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
5.7 Points (81%)
min: 3.9     avg: 5.1     median: 5.5 (79%)     max: 5.5 Points
3DMark Vantage - 3DM Vant. Perf. CPU no Physx
5802 Points (6%)
min: 5252     avg: 5399     median: 5424 (5%)     max: 5496 Points

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9800 → 100% n=11

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T9550 → 92% n=11

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.18
log 02. 08:58:46

#0 checking url part for id 448 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 449 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 30 Sep 2022 13:14:19 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.006s ... 0.007s

#5 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.004s ... 0.011s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#7 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#8 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#9 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#10 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#11 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#26 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#33 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#34 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#35 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.011s

#43 composed specs +0s ... 0.011s

#44 did output specs +0s ... 0.011s

#45 getting avg benchmarks for device 448 +0s ... 0.011s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.012s

#47 got single benchmarks 448 +0.009s ... 0.021s

#48 getting avg benchmarks for device 449 +0s ... 0.021s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.022s

#50 got single benchmarks 449 +0.016s ... 0.038s

#51 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.038s

#52 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.039s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.039s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.04s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#58 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#59 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.04s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#63 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.041s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.041s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#73 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#84 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#87 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#88 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#91 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.046s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#97 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.047s

#104 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.048s

#105 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#106 return log +0.004s ... 0.052s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)