Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

Intel Core 2 Duo T7250

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 was a mid range dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the old Merom core featuring only 2 MB level 2 cache and Virtualization functions VT-x. The similar called T7200 offers a larger level 2 cache (4MB) and a lower clocked FSB and therefore is a bit faster on the average. However, due to the smaller cache and the lower core voltage, the T7250 should be a bit more power efficient.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5600

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. Compared to the C2D T5670, the T5600 features Virtualization functions VT-x, but lacks Idle Stats (according to the Intel HP).

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 compare2.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2000 MHz1830 MHz
FSB800667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP35 Watt34 Watt
Transistors291 Million291 Million
65 nm1.075V-1.175V65 nm1.0375V-1.300V
Die Size143 mm2143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478PBGA479, PPGA478
FeaturesVirtualization, Intel 64, Enhanced Speedstep, Execute Disable BitVirtualization VT-x, Enhanced Speedstep, Intel 64, Execute Disable Bit
Architecturex86x86
Announced
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T7250Intel Core 2 Duo T5600
$241 U.S.

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 1999     avg: 2062     median: 2072.5 (19%)     max: 2093 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
100%
1 T7250 +
min: 3729     avg: 3771     median: 3762.5 (5%)     max: 3822 Points
wPrime 2.10 - wPrime 2.0 32m *
45 s (9%)
48.8 s (10%)
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
min: 1608     avg: 1678     median: 1705 (4%)     max: 1751 Points
min: 1540     avg: 1560     median: 1559.5 (3%)     max: 1579 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5600 +
215 Points (83%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
min: 27     avg: 29.5     median: 29.5 (6%)     max: 32 s
31 s (7%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
min: 65     avg: 69.5     median: 69.5 (3%)     max: 74 s
79 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
min: 1432     avg: 1544     median: 1544 (7%)     max: 1656 s
1818 s (8%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
min: 18085     avg: 18213     median: 18213 (9%)     max: 18341 MIPS
min: 16812     avg: 18676     median: 16959 (8%)     max: 22256 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
min: 11961     avg: 12395     median: 12395 (10%)     max: 12829 MFLOPS
min: 8209     avg: 10449     median: 11471 (9%)     max: 11667 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5600 +
561 Points (38%)
SPEC CPU2000 int - SPEC CPU2000 int
100%
1 T5600 +
1792 Points (74%)
SPEC CPU2000 fp - SPEC CPU2000 fp
100%
1 T5600 +
1740 Points (79%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5600 +
min: 5153     avg: 5868     median: 5902 (79%)     max: 6347 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
min: 3715     avg: 4317     median: 4366 (27%)     max: 4794 Points
min: 3579     avg: 4104     median: 4157 (26%)     max: 4522 Points
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T7250 +
4.9 Points (70%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 → 96% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 28. 10:32:39

#0 checking url part for id 340 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 171 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 27 Jun 2022 13:12:58 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 340 +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.007s

#41 got single benchmarks 340 +0.022s ... 0.029s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 171 +0s ... 0.029s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.03s

#44 got single benchmarks 171 +0.017s ... 0.046s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.046s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#50 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.048s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.048s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#61 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#62 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#64 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.05s

#65 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#66 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.051s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#69 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.051s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#71 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#72 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.052s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.052s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#77 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.053s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.053s

#81 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#82 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#85 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#86 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#90 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#92 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#94 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#95 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#99 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#100 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#102 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#103 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.056s

#104 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#105 return log +0.004s ... 0.061s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)