Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops based on the old Merom core. It offers only an FSB of 667 MHz and 2 MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo T5500
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7800 compare2.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7700 compare2.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 compare2.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7500 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 compare2.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 compare2.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5870 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5800 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7250 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5750 compare2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7700 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 compare1.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5600 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 compare1.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5300 compare1.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T5200 compare1.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7500 compare1.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7300 compare1.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L7100 compare1.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2100 MHz1660 MHz
FSB667667
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt
65 nm65 nm1.0375-1.3V
Architecturex86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5500

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2161 Points (19%)
min: 1656     avg: 1717     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1836 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3997 Points (5%)
min: 3026     avg: 3190     median: 3069 (4%)     max: 3476 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1768 Points (4%)
min: 1339     avg: 1387     median: 1392 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5500 +
204 Points (78%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (7%)     max: 34 s
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
66 s (3%)
83 s (4%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
1518 s (7%)
1923 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19664 MIPS (9%)
min: 15145     avg: 16727     median: 15195 (7%)     max: 19840 MIPS
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13902 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 7386     avg: 9338     median: 10261 (8%)     max: 10367 MFLOPS
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5500 +
532 Points (36%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 4776     avg: 5083     median: 4898 (66%)     max: 5787 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4516 Points (28%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5850 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 → 100% n=9

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 → 84% n=9

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2022, 2021
v1.17
log 25. 03:21:07

#0 checking url part for id 440 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Jun 2022 13:12:54 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#4 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.003s ... 0.004s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#6 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.004s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.004s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#37 composed specs +0s ... 0.005s

#38 did output specs +0s ... 0.005s

#39 getting avg benchmarks for device 440 +0s ... 0.005s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#41 got single benchmarks 440 +0.007s ... 0.013s

#42 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0s ... 0.013s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.014s

#44 got single benchmarks 174 +0.027s ... 0.041s

#45 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.041s

#46 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.042s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.042s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#49 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#53 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#54 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.043s

#55 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.043s

#56 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#57 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.044s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.044s

#60 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#61 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.045s

#62 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.045s

#63 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#65 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#66 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#67 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.046s

#68 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#69 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#70 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#71 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#72 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.047s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.047s

#74 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.048s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#76 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.049s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#78 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#80 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.049s

#82 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.049s

#83 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.05s

#84 return log +0.004s ... 0.053s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)