Notebookcheck Logo

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 vs Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

Intel Core 2 Duo T5850

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 is an entry level dual core processor for laptops based on the old Merom core. It offers only an FSB of 667 MHz and 2 MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5500

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5550 is an entry-level dual core processor for laptops. It is based on the Merom-2M core and therefore manufactured in 65nm. It does not support Virtualization functions VT-x of the Merom core and offers only a low clock speed and 2MB level 2 cache.

Intel Core 2 Duo T5900

► remove from comparison

The Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 is a Merom based dual core processor for laptops. It was later succeeded by the Penryn based Core 2 Duo T6600, which is produced in 45nm and due to core enhancements a bit faster.

ModelIntel Core 2 Duo T5850Intel Core 2 Duo T5500Intel Core 2 Duo T5900
SeriesIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 DuoIntel Core 2 Duo
CodenameMeromMeromMerom
Series: Core 2 Duo Merom
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T78002.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T77002.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T76002.33 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T75002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T74002.16 GHz2 / 2
» Intel Core 2 Duo T59002.2 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T73002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58502.1 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58702 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T58002 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T72502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T57502 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP77001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T71001.8 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T56001.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55501.83 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T55001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T53001.73 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo SP75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo T52001.66 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L75001.6 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L73001.4 GHz2 / 2
Intel Core 2 Duo L71001.2 GHz2 / 2
Clock2100 MHz1660 MHz2200 MHz
FSB667667800
L2 Cache2 MB2 MB2 MB
Cores / Threads2 / 22 / 22 / 2
TDP34 Watt34 Watt35 Watt
Technology65 nm65 nm1.0375-1.3V65 nm
Architecturex86x86x86
Announced
Transistors291 Million
Die Size143 mm2
max. Temp.100 °C
SocketPBGA479, PPGA478Socket P
ManufacturerIntel Core 2 Duo T5500
L1 Cache128 KB
FeaturesMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, Enhanced Intel SpeedStep Technology (EIST), Intel 64, XD bit (an NX bit implementation), iAMT2 (Intel Active Management), TXT

Benchmarks

Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single (32bit)
2161 Points (19%)
min: 1656     avg: 1717     median: 1660 (15%)     max: 1836 Points
min: 2116     avg: 2123     median: 2123 (19%)     max: 2130 Points
Cinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi (32bit)
3997 Points (5%)
min: 3026     avg: 3190     median: 3069 (4%)     max: 3476 Points
min: 3894     avg: 3997     median: 3997 (5%)     max: 4100 Points
3DMark 06 - CPU - 3DMark 06 - CPU
1768 Points (4%)
min: 1339     avg: 1387     median: 1392 (3%)     max: 1426 Points
min: 1838     avg: 1864     median: 1864 (4%)     max: 1890 Points
Sysmark 2004SE - Sysmark 2004SE Score
100%
1 T5500 +
204 Points (78%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 1M *
27 s (6%)
min: 31.34     avg: 32.7     median: 32.7 (7%)     max: 34 s
26 s (6%)
Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 2M *
66 s (3%)
83 s (4%)
65 s (3%)
Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - Super Pi mod 1.5 XS 32M *
100%
1 T5850 +
1518 s (7%)
98%
1 T5500 +
1923 s (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS) - SiSoft Sandra Dhrystone (MIPS)
19664 MIPS (9%)
min: 15145     avg: 16727     median: 15195 (7%)     max: 19840 MIPS
18700 MIPS (9%)
SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS) - SiSoft Sandra Whetstone (MFLOPS)
13902 MFLOPS (11%)
min: 7386     avg: 9338     median: 10261 (8%)     max: 10367 MFLOPS
14000 MFLOPS (11%)
Cinebench 9 Score - Cinebench 9 Score
100%
1 T5500 +
532 Points (36%)
PCMark 04 - PCMark 04 - Standard
100%
1 T5500 +
min: 4776     avg: 5083     median: 4898 (66%)     max: 5787 Points
PCMark 05 - PCMark 05 - Standard
4516 Points (28%)
4639 Points (29%)
Windows Vista Experience Index - Windows Vista Leistungsindex - Prozessor
100%
1 T5850 +
5.1 Points (73%)

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5850 → 100% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5500 → 82% n=8

Average Benchmarks Intel Core 2 Duo T5900 → 100% n=8

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

v1.17
log 16. 16:16:16

#0 checking url part for id 440 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 174 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 439 +0s ... 0s

#3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:13:41 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s

#6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#8 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#9 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#10 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#11 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#12 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#13 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#14 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#15 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#16 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#17 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#18 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#19 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#20 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#21 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#22 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#23 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#24 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#27 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#28 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#29 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#30 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#31 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.005s

#32 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#33 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#34 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#35 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.005s

#36 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.006s

#37 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#38 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#39 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#40 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#41 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#42 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#43 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#44 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#45 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#46 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#47 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#48 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#49 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#50 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#51 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#52 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#53 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#54 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#55 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#56 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.006s

#57 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#58 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#59 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#60 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.006s

#61 composed specs +0s ... 0.006s

#62 did output specs +0s ... 0.006s

#63 getting avg benchmarks for device 440 +0s ... 0.007s

#64 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.007s

#65 got single benchmarks 440 +0.007s ... 0.015s

#66 getting avg benchmarks for device 174 +0s ... 0.015s

#67 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.016s

#68 got single benchmarks 174 +0.029s ... 0.045s

#69 getting avg benchmarks for device 439 +0s ... 0.046s

#70 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.046s

#71 got single benchmarks 439 +0.006s ... 0.052s

#72 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.052s

#73 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#74 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.053s

#75 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#76 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#77 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.054s

#78 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.054s

#79 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#80 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#81 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#82 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#83 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#84 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.055s

#85 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.055s

#86 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.056s

#87 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.056s

#88 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.056s

#89 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.057s

#90 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#91 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#92 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.057s

#93 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.058s

#94 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#95 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.058s

#96 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#97 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.059s

#98 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.059s

#99 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#100 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#101 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#102 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#103 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.06s

#104 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#105 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#106 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.06s

#107 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#108 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.061s

#109 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.062s

#110 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0.001s ... 0.062s

#111 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#112 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0s ... 0.062s

#113 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#114 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#115 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#116 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.062s

#117 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#118 linkCache_getLink using $NBC_LINKCACHE +0s ... 0.063s

#119 min, max, avg, median took s +0s ... 0.063s

#120 return log +0s ... 0.063s

Please share our article, every link counts!
.170
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)