Sony Xperia X Compact
Specifications

Secondary Camera: 5 MPix (f/2.4, Exmor-R sensor 1/5", 25 mm wide angle)
Price comparison
Average of 53 scores (from 102 reviews)
Reviews for the Sony Xperia X Compact
Compact and enduring, but no more high-end. Sony once again offers a Compact version of its flagship smartphone this year. However, the smaller model will have to make do with slower components from now on. Our review shows why this is not necessarily a problem.
Source: Techradar

Sony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 08/07/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techradar

Sony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Techradar

Sony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/08/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Gadgetspeak

Having recently told you about the larger Xperia XZ here a chance to put the smaller sibling through its paces, like the larger offering both were supplied by Vodafone and with this I got the chance to check their coverage not only in England but also Scotland.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 03/01/2017
Rating: Total score: 80% price: 60% performance: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Laptop Media

When we are talking about Android smartphones, it is difficult to find models with screen size less than 5 inches as the 5.5-inch diagonal is growing ever more popular. We believe that there certainly is a group of users who still prefer more compact devices. These who provide not only comfortable grip with one hand but also the ability to easily operate with this very hand. Usually, when we are discussing a compact smartphone it’s most likely a budget offer. Xperia X Compact, however, is something different.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/21/2017
Source: Tech Smart

Despite proving solid in all departments, the X compact has arrived a little late on the scene. It's no fault of the phone, however, but simply a fact that it was released alongside the XZ flagship and is not specced in a similar fashion, as has been the trend for previous versions of Xperia compact devices, like the Z1 and Z1 Compact. As such, instead of users hoping for a smaller version of the XZ top of the range offering, what they actually have is a smaller version of the mid-range X with an improved camera.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/06/2016
Source: GSM Arena

To wrap things up, the Sony Xperia X Compact is a great small smartphone. If you look beyond the specs sheet, this is one of the best small phones you can buy. It has a capable camera that, in good light, would capture photos with unrivaled detail. It's got a top build quality, an excellent screen, a snappy, well-placed fingerprint reader, stereo speakers and a solid processor.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 100% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Soycincau

There’s simply no meaningful competition for Sony or the Xperia X Compact right now. They’re king. If you want a “flagship” compact Android phone, your hands are tied because this is really your only real option right now. So either you get something that has a larger screen or prepare to pony up for the X Compact.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Source: Brighthand

The hardware keeps the Sony Xperia X Compact out of the flagship space, but it’s still one of the best devices smaller than five inches on the market. Its long-lasting battery deserves the most praise, and we also like its modern design, attractive display, and decent performance.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/08/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: CNet

Sony's Xperia X Compact is a small phone with an excellent camera, but it lacks some creature comforts, like waterproofing and, in the US, a fingerprint sensor.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 75% performance: 70% mobility: 70% workmanship: 80%
Source: T Break

Whether the Sony Xperia X Compact is truly a successor to the previous Xperia Z5 Compact is a very tricky question. The new device does bring in a new appealing design that feels more comfortable to hold, faster fingerprint scanning, better cameras that produce cleaner images, and amazing predictive autofocusing with 5-axis stabilization for videos. Despite having a less powerful processor, the performance of the device is also good.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/12/2016
Rating: Total score: 90% price: 85% performance: 85% features: 85% workmanship: 90%
Source: Trusted Reviews

The Sony Xperia X Compact is far from the worst Android phone I've used this year, even if it is one of the ugliest. If you want an Android phone with a display size smaller than 5 inches then it’s probably your only choice. Widen your horizons, however, and there are better choices out there.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 60% price: 60% performance: 70% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 50%
Source: Tech Advisor

The Sony Xperia X Compact is an odd little smartphone. On the one hand its build quality, lack of waterproofing and lack of a standout feature make it harder to recommend compared to the older Xperia Z5 Compact. However, if you want a sub-5in Android smartphone with excellent battery life it’s the best current option out there. For all its flaws, we also kept coming back to the phone largely due to its sheer portability. Just don’t buy the blue one.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/06/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% price: 70% performance: 70% features: 80% workmanship: 70%
Source: Tom's Guide

Still, $500 is a lot to pay for a phone whose camera doesn't perform as well in low light as Sony promises. It's also not as speedy as phones that are cheaper. Overall, we prefer the Honor 8 and OnePlus 3, both of which cost $100 less than the compact Xperia. But if you value battery life in a compact design, Sony's latest phone may fit the bill.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: PC Mag

The Sony Xperia X Compact is a capable midrange phone with a good camera, but at $500, it's priced higher than most of its competition, including our Editors' Choice for compact phones, the Apple iPhone SE. For $100 less the SE gets you a more powerful processor, a fingerprint scanner, and Apple's superior app ecosystem. If Apple is out the question, the $400 ZTE Axon 7 also gets you a faster processor and a fingerprint sensor, as well as a much sharper display. But it's significantly larger than the X Compact, and not ideal for one-handed use. That makes the X Compact one of the best compact Android phones you can buy, though you'll get a lot more bang for your buck by going larger.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Expert Reviews

Equally, though, the X Compact is a disappointment in other areas. It’s nowhere near as nice a thing as the Z5 Compact, it’s not as quick and it isn’t water-resistant, either. All things told, I still prefer the Z5 Compact, even more so now that the two phones are now on sale for around the same price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Recombu

Sony’s Xperia X Compact isn’t much of an evolution over last year’s Xperia Z5 Compact, offering up pretty much the same performance and battery life while also stripping away water resistance and 4K video recording. Considering it’s about the same price, that means existing owners have no need to upgrade.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Android Authority

The Xperia X Compact is a great phone, and if you choose to buy one, you certainly won’t be disappointed. However, without a fingerprint sensor (with the US version), or features like dust and water resistance, the $500 price tag is hard to accept, just for the convenience that its size offers. If you are looking for the best value for money, this phone isn’t the one to get, but if you just want a compact phone that doesn’t compromise a whole lot, that’s when you might find this device to be worth every penny.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 80%
Source: Techradar

Sony's X Compact is the best-looking yet in the small range. However, the quest to attract more eyes brought about a few too many sacrifices. Compared to the Z5 Compact, it's a slightly underpowered and fragile offering.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: Android Central

The Xperia X Compact gives you everything you need in terms of screen, performance, battery life — plus a few nice additions like stereo speakers, a slick software experience and Sony's latest camera technology. But this isn't simply a flagship-level phone in a smaller size: you're getting a plastic phone that's also missing a fingerprint sensor and waterproofing. So for as great as the X Compact is, it sits in an odd area — offering you less than other phones, but still commanding a $499 price. You really have to want a small phone to spend that much on the X Compact.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/22/2016
Source: Phone Arena

As far as the competition goes, the X Compact is really in a niche of its own right now. There's the cheaper but similarly sized Samsung Galaxy A3 (2016), which has a 4.7” display, a fancier styling, decent camera, and fine battery life, though considerably less-potent hardware. Looking away from Android, the 4.7” iPhone 6 can be found at a similar price point today, and can actually get you much more phone for the money. In the X Compact's $450-$500 range, however, there is little in Android's small-and-strong category but its predecessor, the Z5 Compact, which happens to be a more powerful handset, at a lower price right now.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/21/2016
Rating: Total score: 68%
Source: GSM Arena

If you want the compact version of the Xperia X Compact review, here it goes. Sony hasn't given up on the concept of high-powered minis, just toned it down a notch. A few signature features have gone missing, yes, but then again so have the rivals in this admittedly niche category. Price has been adjusted accordingly too, and for those who still find it steep a few months of patience could well be worth it.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/17/2016
Source: PC Mag

The Xperia X Compact will be available in the US starting September 25. Pricing has not yet been announced, but the lesser specs in play here will be a lot easier to swallow if they come at a significantly reduced price. Check back soon for more info, as well as a full review when the phone is available.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Pocket Lint

The Sony Xperia X Compact is over-shadowed by the devices that have come before it carrying the same name. The Compact was once the de facto choice for those wanting a smaller device that doesn't compromise on the power it offers, for flagship performance.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Stuff TV

From what we've seen so far, the Xperia X Compact looks set to be the best miniature handset around. It's no surprise really, given Sony's past commitment to cramming in respectable specs into a small-screened device.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Trusted Reviews

Being someone who's used each iteration of the Xperia Compact over the years, I’m a little disappointed by the latest version. By ditching the theme of presenting high-end specs in a small body, Sony has simply ended up with a small mid-range phone that doesn’t really do anything differently. It isn't water-resistant, it doesn’t have the same specs as the Xperia flagships, and it's truly ugly to boot.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Expert Reviews

If you don’t fancy shelling out for a full-priced flagship, your options are a mid-range device from one of the big manufacturers, or grabbing a bargain device from OnePlus or the Nexus ranges. Come October, though, and you’ll also be able to choose the Xperia X Compact. If prices are reasonable, and that camera is as good as Sony claims, this little smartphone could be a shoo-in for one of the best compact phones of 2016.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: International Business Times

Unlike the metal-backed XZ, the Compact has a glass back which is the same colour as its glass front and metal sides. Despite its smaller size and expected lower cost, the X Compact is still clearly a flagship phone with the looks, performance and camera to match. It has the same 23-megapixel rear camera and the same smart charging technology as the XZ. The processor if the X Compact is the Snapdragon 650, whereas the XZ uses the higher-spec 820.
Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/01/2016
Foreign Reviews
Source: Android Mag

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/28/2017
Rating: performance: 100% features: 100% display: 80% mobility: 60% workmanship: 60%
Source: Cyberbloc

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/26/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Area DVD

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 12/08/2016
Source: Billiger-telefonieren.de

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/15/2016
Source: Verivox

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/11/2016
Rating: Total score: 67% features: 63% ergonomy: 74%
Source: WinFuture

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Inside Handy

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Connect - Heft 12/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Smartphone Magazin - Heft 1/2017

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Teltarif

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 87% features: 85% workmanship: 92% ergonomy: 87%
Source: Computerbase

Comparison, online available, Long, Date: 10/11/2016
Source: PCtipp.ch

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Futurezone.at

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/08/2016
Source: n-tv

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/05/2016
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/01/2016
Source: e-media - Heft 11/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 10/01/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/29/2016
Rating: Total score: 82% performance: 84% display: 75% mobility: 84%
Source: Blick

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/27/2016
Source: Chip.de

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 89% price: 86% performance: 94% features: 86% display: 88% mobility: 87%
Source: A1 Blog

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/08/2016
Source: Android Pit

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Curved

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: Computerbild - Heft 19/2016

Single Review, , Length Unknown, Date: 08/15/2016
Source: Movil Zona

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: El Androide Libre

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/31/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Computerhoy

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/22/2016
Rating: Total score: 81% price: 70% features: 80% display: 80% mobility: 80% workmanship: 60%
Source: Andro 4 All

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 84%
Source: Zona Movilidad

Positive: Nice design; decent speakers; fast fingerprint sensor; quick charge. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 02/18/2017
Source: Tuexperto

Positive: Compact size; excellent cameras; very good display. Negative: Easy to save fingerprints on case.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/01/2016
Source: Ridble

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/19/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Batista70Phone

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 11/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% price: 50% display: 80% mobility: 90% ergonomy: 100%
Source: AndroidPit.it

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/17/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 75% features: 80% display: 90% mobility: 80% ergonomy: 80%
Source: HDblog.it

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/10/2016
Rating: Total score: 82%
Source: Smartphone e tablet android

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 10/10/2016
Rating: performance: 80% display: 80% mobility: 70% workmanship: 70%
Source: Andrea Galeazzi

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/26/2016
Rating: Total score: 85% price: 79% display: 82% mobility: 82% workmanship: 86%
Source: Techstation.it

Positive: Stylish design; compact size; decent hardware; good connectivity. Negative: Unsupport waterproof; high price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 06/12/2017
Source: AndroidPit.it

Positive: Compact size. Negative: Average hardware.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/07/2016
Source: Computer Totaal

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 01/21/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: All About Phones

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/15/2017
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GadgetGear.nl

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/09/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: GadgetGear.nl

Comparison, online available, Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: AndroidWorld.nl

Positive: Compact size; fast system; easy to use; long battery life; flexible fingerprint sensor; good speakers. Negative: Unsupport waterproof and dust avoiding.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/02/2016
Source: Bright.nl

Positive: Compact size; decent display; good cameras; long battery life. Negative: Relatively heavy; plastic case; many unwanted apps.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 10/23/2016
Source: Les Mobiles

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/12/2017
Rating: Total score: 76%
Source: CNet France

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/24/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Phonandroid

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/16/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Top for Phone

Positive: High performance; nice design; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/02/2017
Source: Frandroid

Positive: Compact size; new and nice design; long battery life. Negative: Unsupport waterproof IP68; average performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/16/2016
Source: AndroidPit.fr

Positive: Good display; decent cameras. Negative: Plastic case; mediocre performance.
Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/02/2016
Source: 90 Sekund

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 70% performance: 90% features: 60% mobility: 90% workmanship: 50%
Source: Tabletowo

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% performance: 90% display: 90% mobility: 90% workmanship: 75%
Source: Antyweb

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: One Tech

Positive: Compact size; nice display; decent speakers; high autonomy. Negative: High price; unsupport waterproof and dust avoiding.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/24/2016
Source: Gry.wm.pl

Positive: Compact size; stylish design; nice display; good autonomy. Negative: Unsupport waterproof; relatively high price.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/19/2016
Source: Komorkomania

Positive: Compact size; excellent display. Negative: Plastic case; relatively thick.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/08/2016
Source: Spiders Web

Positive: Compact size; flexible fingerprint sensor; good speakers; decent cameras. Negative: Many unwanted applications; short battery life.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2016
Source: Android.com.pl

Positive: Good cameras; high performance; flexible fingerprint sensor; long battery life. Negative: Mediocre case.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 09/28/2016
Source: Spiders Web

Positive: Beautiful design; compact size; good display; long battery life. Negative: Relatively high price; mediocre performance; poor cameras; unsupport waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 09/24/2016
Source: Ferra.ru

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 10/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 80%
Source: Hi-Tech Mail

Positive: Compact size; elegant design; bright screen; decent speakers; good fingerprint sensor; fast charge. Negative: High price.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 12/01/2016
Source: Product Test

Positive: Slim size; high quality cameras. Negative: Unsupport waterproof and dust avoiding.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/01/2016
Source: CZC

Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 11/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 75%
Source: Svet Androida

Positive: Long battery life; nice display; good speakers; fast system. Negative: Unsupport waterproof; uncomfortable volume buttons.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 03/19/2017
Source: CNews.cz

Positive: Compact size; support USB-C. Negative: Mediocre hardware; low performance; poor cameras.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 01/31/2017
Source: The Gioididong

Positive: Good display. Negative: Plastic case; mediocre hardware; small screen.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/09/2016
Source: Tek.no

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/28/2016
Rating: Total score: 70%
Source: Mobilsiden.dk

Single Review, online available, Very Short, Date: 09/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 67%
Source: Mobil DK

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/19/2016
Rating: Total score: 84% display: 80% mobility: 90% workmanship: 80%
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Positive: Excellent cameras; beautiful screen; compact size. Negative: Unsupport waterproof.
Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: Mere Mobil.dk

Positive: Very good cameras; beautiful screen; good size. Negative: Unsupport waterproof; slippery backside.
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/30/2016
Source: M3 PC för alla

Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 09/23/2016
Rating: Total score: 90%
Source: Mobil.se

Single Review, online available, Medium, Date: 09/20/2016
Rating: Total score: 76% performance: 70%
Source: Techbox

Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 10/04/2016
Rating: Total score: 94%
Comment
Model: One of Sony’s latest offerings, the Xperia X Compact, is a small mid-range handset aimed at users who prefer miniature-sized phones that still packs a punch. The X Compact is put together with a mix of Gorilla Glass 4, glossy plastic on its sides, and an oleophobic plastic on the back that makes the phone feel extra durable. While it does give off the high-end look, it is prone to small scratches and fingerprint smudges. The X Compact has a unique boxy design with no camera bump and measures in at 129 x 65 x 9.5 mm. Weighing at 135 grams, the handset is primed for easy one-handed use, and fits cosily in the pockets.Taking a tour around the X Compact, the headphone jack is located on the top. On its other flat end, Sony has opted for USB-C, which has resulted in a thicker chin bezel due to the longer internal section of the port. The power button, volume rocker and a dedicated camera capture button sit on the right side of the handset. In Europe, the power button also integrates a fast fingerprint scanner, however, this is a feature lacking in the US versions of the X Compact. Opposite, on the left, is the SIM tray, with a microSD slot to bump up the 32 GB internal storage with up to 258 GB of additional storage. The X Compact is also missing another significant feature: waterproofing.
At 4.6 inch, the display of the X Compact is significantly smaller than the average Android phone. It is an IPS LCD panel with 720p resolution. Thanks to Sony’s own Triluminos and X-Reality technology, the colors are pushed up to those more akin to AMOLED. As a result, colors and contrast are more balanced and the picture is surprisingly sharp and vibrant. Viewing angles are fantastic, and the brightness can be jacked up high enough to make the X Compact great for outdoor use. The main highlight of the X Compact is its 23 MP camera with wide 24 mm f/2 lens and flash, making the handset great for capturing landscapes, street scenes and tight spots. It also comes with five-axis stabilization, predictive autofocus and an infrared sensor to help with white balance. Meanwhile, the 5 MP secondary camera is a standard fanfare and takes decent selfies. The X Compact also features a set of front-firing speakers that may sound a little soft, but it works fine for alarms and YouTube videos. Under the hood, the X Compact runs on Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 650 CPU, an Adreno 510, and 3 GB of RAM. It’s a mid-range setup and runs on Android 6.0.1 Marshmallow, but with Sony’s custom interface on top. The X Compact has a 2,700 mAh battery – which might sound small, but for a miniature phone with a screen of this resolution it performs admirably. Supported by Qualcomm QuickCharge 3.0, it will not take long for it to be fully charged. Overall, the Xperia X Compact is a solid phone with a very good camera. However, the 4.6-inch display might not be relevant in the current market anymore. There are very few who would want a phone of this size.
Hands-on article by Jagadisa Rajarathnam
Qualcomm Adreno 510: Integrated graphics card based on the Adreno 500 architecture, like the Adreno 520 in the Snapdragon 820. Performance should be on average similar to the old Adreno 330 in the Snapdragon 801. Supports DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
650 MSM8956: Upper middle class ARM based SoC with 6 CPU cores (64 Bit Cortex A72 and A53 mixture) and a Adreno 510 GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
4.60":
This display is tiny. You will probably see very little on the screen and be able to use mini-resolutions.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.Sony: Sony Corporation is one of the largest Japanese electronics companies. The company was founded in 1946 under a different name and initially produced rice stoves. The company launched the first transistor radio. In 1958, the company was renamed Sony. Sony is a combination of the Latin word sonus (sound) and the English word sonny (little boy). Today, its core business is consumer electronics. The company is engaged in the development, design, manufacture and sale of electronic equipment, instruments, devices, game consoles and software. Sony operates in the following segments: Gaming and Network Services, Music, Images, Home Entertainment and Sound, Imaging Products and Solutions, Mobile Communications, Semiconductors, Financial Services and Others.
76.88%: This rating is not earth-shattering. This rating must actually be seen as average, since there are about as many devices with worse ratings as better ones. A purchase recommendation can only be seen with a lot of goodwill, unless it is about websites that generally rate strictly.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.