Oppo R9s Plus

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Oppo R9s Plus

OPPO R9s Plus and R9s — Australian Review
Source: Ausdroid Archive.org version
We’ve gone pretty hard on the phones on the software side, but the reality is that they’re affordable, high quality alternatives to the top-tier phones from the big manufacturers. Color OS simply isn’t to our tastes at all – It makes Oppo’s amazing hardware feel just the little bit more pedestrian and uninspired, and it made it a tough sell to stick with the phones for longer than the review period when our usual day-to-day phones feature a more Android-like UI. There’s an increasing number of Aussies out there buying Oppo’s phones though, and it makes us feel that our criticism of Color OS is perhaps a bit off-base for general consumers.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2017

Oppo R9s & R9s Plus smartphone review: Can they challenge the incumbents?
Source: Hardware Zone Archive.org version
In a nutshell, the Oppo R9s and Oppo R9s Plus are reasonably decent phones - all the expected functionality for its price point, good design (albeit it looks very familiar) and has an acceptable set of cameras for normal photography and high resolution selfies. However in these days, a decent phone for a reasonable price may not be adequate and Oppo needs to be concerned about competition.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2017

Review: Oppo R9s Plus phone
Source: Gadgetguy Archive.org version
The Oppo R9s Plus is a fine phone, with the feel of a premium model, a massive screen of good quality, strong performance, at somewhat of a bargain price. Very impressive indeed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017

Foreign Reviews

60% Test Oppo R9s Plus
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%

69% Oppo R9s Plus review:
Source: CNet France FR→EN Archive.org version
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%

Comment

Qualcomm Adreno 510: Integrated graphics card based on the Adreno 500 architecture, like the Adreno 520 in the Snapdragon 820. Performance should be on average similar to the old Adreno 330 in the Snapdragon 801. Supports DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.

Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

652 MSM8976: Upper middle class ARM based SoC with 8 CPU cores (64 Bit Cortex A72 and A53 mixture) and a Adreno 510 GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

6.00":

It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.

64.5%: Such a poor rating is rare. There are only a few notebooks that were rated even worse. The rating websites do not give a purchase recommendation here.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices with the Same Specs

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU

Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight