Oppo R9s Plus
Specifications
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix f/2.0
Price comparison
Average of 2 scores (from 5 reviews)
Reviews for the Oppo R9s Plus
Source: Ausdroid
Archive.org versionWe’ve gone pretty hard on the phones on the software side, but the reality is that they’re affordable, high quality alternatives to the top-tier phones from the big manufacturers. Color OS simply isn’t to our tastes at all – It makes Oppo’s amazing hardware feel just the little bit more pedestrian and uninspired, and it made it a tough sell to stick with the phones for longer than the review period when our usual day-to-day phones feature a more Android-like UI. There’s an increasing number of Aussies out there buying Oppo’s phones though, and it makes us feel that our criticism of Color OS is perhaps a bit off-base for general consumers.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 05/02/2017
Source: Hardware Zone
Archive.org versionIn a nutshell, the Oppo R9s and Oppo R9s Plus are reasonably decent phones - all the expected functionality for its price point, good design (albeit it looks very familiar) and has an acceptable set of cameras for normal photography and high resolution selfies. However in these days, a decent phone for a reasonable price may not be adequate and Oppo needs to be concerned about competition.
Comparison, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/30/2017
Source: Gadgetguy
Archive.org versionThe Oppo R9s Plus is a fine phone, with the feel of a premium model, a massive screen of good quality, strong performance, at somewhat of a bargain price. Very impressive indeed.
Single Review, online available, Very Long, Date: 04/01/2017
Foreign Reviews
Source: CNet France
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Short, Date: 05/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 60%
Source: CNet France
FR→EN Archive.org versionSingle Review, online available, Long, Date: 04/11/2017
Rating: Total score: 69% performance: 70% mobility: 90% workmanship: 60%
Comment
Qualcomm Adreno 510: Integrated graphics card based on the Adreno 500 architecture, like the Adreno 520 in the Snapdragon 820. Performance should be on average similar to the old Adreno 330 in the Snapdragon 801. Supports DirectX12, OpenCL 2.0, OpenGL ES 3.1 + AE.
Only some 3D games with very low demands are playable with these cards.
» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.
652 MSM8976: Upper middle class ARM based SoC with 8 CPU cores (64 Bit Cortex A72 and A53 mixture) and a Adreno 510 GPU.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.
6.00":
It is a very small display format for smartphones. You should by no means be mis-sighted and you will generally see very little on the screen and only have a small resolution available. In return, the device should be very small and handy.
» To find out how fine a display is, see our DPI List.64.5%: Such a poor rating is rare. There are only a few notebooks that were rated even worse. The rating websites do not give a purchase recommendation here.
» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.
