Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 888 5G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G Mobile Platform is a high-end SoC for smartphones that was introduced in late 2020 and manufactured in 5 nm at Samsung. Integrates one “Prime Core” based on a ARM Cortex-X1 architecture clocked at up to 2.84 GHz. Three more performance cores are based on the A78 but clock up to 2.42 GHz. Furthermore, four energy saving cores are integrated that are based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture and clock at up to 1.8 GHz. In addition to the processor cores, the SoC integrates a WiFi 6e modem, a Hexagon 780 DSP (up to 26 TOPS of AI performance) and a Spectra 580 ISP. The integrated memory controller now supports faster LPDDR5 memory with up to 3,200 MHz. 5G is now included in the chip with the Snapdragon X60 modem.

The performance of the processor cores should be around 15% better than the old Snapdragon 865+. The integrated Adreon 660 GPU should make a bigger jump by 35% (most likely compared to the SD 865).

HiSilicon Kirin 9000

► remove from comparison  Kirin 9000

The HiSilicon Kirin 9000 is an ARM based high-end octa-core SoC for smartphones and tablet, which was introduced with the Huawei P40 Pro. It integrates eight CPU cores in three clusters. A single high performance ARM Cortex-A77 cores with up to 3.13 GHz for fast single core performance. Three more performance cores (same Cortex-A77 architecture) with up to 2.54 GHz and four efficiency cores based on the ARM Cortex-A55 architecture with up to 2.05 GHz. All 8 cores can be used at once (big.LITTLE).

The integrated graphics card is using the Mali-G78 architecture and features all 24 cores (G78MP24).

For AI acceleration (NPU), the Kirin 9000 integrates the Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 (2 * Ascend Lite and 1 * Ascend Tiny). Huawei specifies 8 MB of system cache (most likely shared for CPU, GPU and AI) and can access LPDDR4X and LPDDR5 main memory. The integrated 5G modem supports SA&NSA, Sub-6G and mmWave. WiFi 6 including VHT160 and Bluetooth 5.2 are also integrated in the chip.

The CPU performance is in the top tier of mobile SoCs of 2020 and slightly above the Snapdragon 865+ and on a level with the older Apple A13 Bionic SoC.

The Kirin 9000 is produced at TSMC in the modern 5nm process.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 888 5GHiSilicon Kirin 9000
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
CodenameCortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)Cortex-A77/-A55
Series: Cortex-A77/-A55
Qualcomm Snapdragon G3x Gen 1 compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus 5G compare1.8 - 3 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G « 1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 4G compare1.8 - 2.84 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-X1 / A78 / A55 (Kryo 680)
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 « 2.05 - 3.13 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A77/-A55
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E compare2.05 - 3.13 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A77/-A55
Clock1800 - 2840 MHz2050 - 3130 MHz
L3 Cache3 MB
Cores / Threads8 / 8
1 x 2.8 GHz ARM Cortex-X1
3 x 2.4 GHz ARM Cortex-A78
4 x 1.8 GHz ARM Cortex-A55
8 / 8
TDP5 Watt
Technology5 nm5 nm
FeaturesAdreno 660 GPU, Spectra 580 ISP, Hexagon 780, X60 5G Modem, FastConnect 6900 WiFi,LPDDR5-6400 / LPDDR4X-4266 MHz Memory Controller (64 Bit)ARM Mali-G78 MP24 GPU, 1x Cortex-A77 (3.13 GHz) + 3x Cortex-A77 (2.54 GHz) + 4 x Cortex-A55 (2.05 GHz, big.LITTLE), 5G SA&NSA, Sub-6G & mmWave, Da Vinci 2.0 AI, Kirin ISP 6.0
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 660ARM Mali-G78 MP24
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.hisilicon.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 888 5G
min: 1.289     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (99%)     max: 1.3 pt
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
44810 Points (38%)
59268 Points (50%)
5602 Points (66%)
5568 Points (64%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Single-Core
1480 Points (40%)
Geekbench 6.2 - Geekbench 6.2 Multi-Core
3595 Points (14%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 5033     avg: 5081     median: 5087 (51%)     max: 5099 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 14023     avg: 14426     median: 14326 (16%)     max: 14895 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
4421 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
5565 Points (50%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
19860 Points (39%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
9335 Points (19%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
11578 Points (30%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 891     avg: 1319     median: 1321.5 (2%)     max: 1841 ms
1671 ms (2%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 23491     avg: 35591     median: 35487.5 (32%)     max: 47543 Points
26597 Points (24%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 103     avg: 143.1     median: 148 (31%)     max: 182 Points
147 Points (31%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 73679     avg: 100640     median: 99442 (83%)     max: 119537 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 72541     avg: 99872     median: 101553 (82%)     max: 124036 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 226319     avg: 296422     median: 307949 (57%)     max: 319439 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 146069     avg: 180815     median: 186398 (67%)     max: 197454 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 569595     avg: 677749     median: 703138 (68%)     max: 740847 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
min: 6823     avg: 9333     median: 9478.5 (50%)     max: 11551 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
0 Points (0%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 10231     avg: 12376     median: 12822.5 (84%)     max: 15027 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 11823     avg: 14555     median: 14328 (72%)     max: 18942 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 818     avg: 934     median: 963 (37%)     max: 1042 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 5G → 100% n=6

Average Benchmarks HiSilicon Kirin 9000 → 107% n=6

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 07. 10:11:59

#0 checking url part for id 13017 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12943 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:41:01 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.074s ... 0.075s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.076s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 13017 +0.016s ... 0.091s

#7 got single benchmarks 13017 +0.072s ... 0.164s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 12943 +0.004s ... 0.167s

#9 got single benchmarks 12943 +0.01s ... 0.178s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.178s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.17s ... 0.348s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.366s

#13 return log +0.031s ... 0.397s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)