Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765

► remove Qualcomm SD 765

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 (SD765 Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core, called Kryo 475) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster contains two ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.3 GHz (prime core) and 2.2 GHz (gold core) and a power efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Compared to the gaming optimized Snapdragon 765G, the 765 offers -100 MHz less clock speed on the prime core and a lower clocked GPU.

The processor performance is quite comparable to the old Snapdragon 730G. Only the single core performance can be slightly better, thanks to the higher clocked prime core.

The chip is one of the first SoCs that integrate a 5G modem. It is called Snapdragon X52 and supports speeds of up to 3.7 / 1.6 Mbps (down- and upload) and mmWave and Sub-6.

The integrated Adreno 620 offers a 16.7% lower performance than the same GPU in the SD 768G and also misses some of the softare gaming features.

The integrated AI engine uses the GPU, CPU and dedicated cores to reach a theoretical maximum performance of approx. 5.5 TOPS (value from the slightly faster SD 768G).

The processor is manufactured in the modern and energy efficient 7nm EUV process at Samsung. 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G

► remove Qualcomm SD 765G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G (SD765G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core, called Kryo 475) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster contains two ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.4 GHz (prime core) and 2.2 GHz (gold core) and a power efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz. Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

Compared to the normal Snapdragon 765, the 765G is optimized for gaming. This means the graphics card is higher clocked and the chip also supports additional software features (Snapdragon Elite Gaming like Game Smoother, Game Fast Loader and Game Network Latency Manager).

The processor performance is quite comparable to the old Snapdragon 730G. Only the single core performance can be slightly better, thanks to the higher clocked prime core (+200 MHz = 9% higher).

The chip is one of the first SoCs that integrate a 5G modem. It is called Snapdragon X52 and supports speeds of up to 3.7 / 1.6 Mbps (down- and upload) and mmWave and Sub-6.

The integrated Adreno 620 is also higher clocked compared to the one in the normal 765 and should result in 10% higher performance (according to QC).

The integrated AI engine uses the GPU, CPU and dedicated cores to reach a theoretical maximum performance of 5.5 TOPS.

The processor is manufactured in the modern and energy efficient 7nm EUV process at Samsung. 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 765Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
Qualcomm SnapdragonQualcomm Snapdragon
Kryo 475 Gold / SilverKryo 475 Gold / Silver
: Snapdragon Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 7651.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
» Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7651.8 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 Kryo 475 Gold / Silver
1800 - 2300 MHz1800 - 2400 MHz
8 / 88 / 8
7 7
Adreno 620 GPU, X52 5G/LTE Modem, Hexagon 696 DSP, Specra 355 ISPAdreno 620 GPU, X52 5G/LTE Modem, Hexagon 696 DSP, Specra 355 ISP
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 620Qualcomm Adreno 620
ArchitectureARMARM
Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765Qualcomm Snapdragon SD 765G

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.1, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU
42.1 pt (65%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 20156     avg: 20171     median: 20170.5 (21%)     max: 20185 Points
min: 14891     avg: 20608     median: 19971 (21%)     max: 28331 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 3442     avg: 3450     median: 3449.5 (43%)     max: 3457 Points
min: 1898     avg: 3248     median: 3314.5 (42%)     max: 3765 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 3449     avg: 3481     median: 3480.5 (60%)     max: 3512 Points
min: 1790     avg: 3232     median: 3289 (57%)     max: 3651 Points
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Stream
100%
1 SD 765G +
3754 Points (30%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memory
100%
1 SD 765G +
3987 Points (36%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Point
100%
1 SD 765G +
13267 Points (26%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integer
100%
1 SD 765G +
6137 Points (12%)
Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Score
100%
1 SD 765G +
7961 Points (21%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 (0%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 765G +
3072 (48%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 765G +
7661 (19%)
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2785 (38%)
min: 2689     avg: 2811     median: 2863 (39%)     max: 2882
Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7832 (12%)
min: 6213     avg: 7214     median: 7665 (12%)     max: 7765
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 589     avg: 593     median: 592.5 (34%)     max: 596
Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.3 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1869     avg: 1912     median: 1911.5 (11%)     max: 1954
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2753.6     avg: 2759     median: 2758.9 (5%)     max: 2764.2 ms
min: 2358.8     avg: 3874     median: 2733.7 (5%)     max: 15230.1 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 16302     avg: 17001     median: 17001 (29%)     max: 17700 Points
min: 3592     avg: 16587     median: 18551 (31%)     max: 19143 Points
AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 56075     avg: 60654     median: 60654 (55%)     max: 65233 Points
min: 48646     avg: 62485     median: 63529.5 (58%)     max: 71215 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 54697     avg: 56383     median: 56383 (46%)     max: 58069 Points
min: 49426     avg: 59203     median: 57969 (47%)     max: 69210 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 62494     avg: 73846     median: 73846 (20%)     max: 85198 Points
min: 58370     avg: 87922     median: 93822 (25%)     max: 95166 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 98992     avg: 100799     median: 100799 (54%)     max: 102606 Points
min: 82686     avg: 101218     median: 104824 (56%)     max: 109862 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 279244     avg: 291682     median: 291682 (39%)     max: 304120 Points
min: 285731     avg: 310972     median: 316534 (42%)     max: 332074 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile CPU Tests
17028 Points (2%)
208510 Points (27%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision
4214 Points (22%)
min: 4234     avg: 8827     median: 4326.5 (23%)     max: 18932 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage
17658 Points (60%)
min: 4439     avg: 12289     median: 14704 (50%)     max: 17656 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 8336     avg: 8546     median: 8546 (56%)     max: 8756 Points
min: 7245     avg: 8274     median: 7980.5 (52%)     max: 9989 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9914     avg: 9980     median: 9979.5 (50%)     max: 10045 Points
min: 8687     avg: 9640     median: 9661 (48%)     max: 10876 Points

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 → 100% n=19

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G → 160% n=19

-
-
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2020, 2019
v1.16
Please share our article, every link counts!
> Notebook / Laptop Reviews and News > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2017-09-11)