Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Samsung Exynos 850

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 720G

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (SD730G Mobile Platform) is a fast mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It integrates eight cores (octa-core) divided into two clusters. A fast performance cluster contains two ARM Cortex-A76 cores clocked at up to 2.3 GHz (Kryo 465 Gold) and a power efficiency cluster with six small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at up to 1.8 GHz (Kryo 465 Silver). Depending on the workload only single clusters or all cores can run at different clock speeds.

The differences to the Snapdragon 730(G) Kryo 470 are not known, although the performance is comparable.

The chip includes a range of other features like a fast X15 LTE radio (800 Mbits Cat 15 download), Wi-Fi 6 wireless radios (802.11ax), satellite positioning, USB-C 3.1, Spectra 350L ISP, Hexagon 692 DSP, H.265 video en- and decode, an LPDDR4X-3733 dual-channel memory controller and a Adreno 618 graphics card.

The Snapdragon 720G is manufactured in the modern 8 nm process at Samsung (8LLP).

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 720GSamsung Exynos 850
CodenameCortex-A76 / A55Cortex-A55
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Clock2300 MHz <=2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology8 nm8 nm
FeaturesAdreno 618 GPU, X15 LTE Modem, Hexagon 692 DSP, Specra 350L ISPLTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 618 (500 MHz)ARM Mali-G52 MP1
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - SD 720G
0.6 pt (47%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
min: 14849     avg: 19808     median: 20019 (16%)     max: 24117 Points
18816 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2730     avg: 3137     median: 3184 (30%)     max: 3321 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2737     avg: 3135     median: 3167 (36%)     max: 3267 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 545     avg: 562     median: 567 (19%)     max: 570 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1622     avg: 1713     median: 1694 (3%)     max: 1798 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2620 Points (26%)
987 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
6263 Points (6%)
4986 Points (5%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 720G +
6077 Points (10%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
100%
1 SD 720G +
2343 Points (35%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2532     avg: 2957     median: 2850 (3%)     max: 3577 ms
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 11846     avg: 16261     median: 17265 (11%)     max: 17734 Points
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (4%)     max: 5904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
25 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
min: 53     avg: 67.6     median: 69 (12%)     max: 78 Points
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (7%)     max: 39 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 49427     avg: 53354     median: 52960 (44%)     max: 59563 Points
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 46713     avg: 51181     median: 50365 (41%)     max: 56477 Points
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 68991     avg: 71176     median: 71560 (13%)     max: 72444 Points
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 84491     avg: 97270     median: 99822 (36%)     max: 103632 Points
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 253274     avg: 272982     median: 275464 (27%)     max: 288306 Points
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 297261     avg: 320558     median: 320558 (16%)     max: 343854 Points
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (6%)     max: 146815 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 90879     avg: 97691     median: 97690.5 (24%)     max: 104502 Points
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (10%)     max: 43937 Points
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
18494 Points (2%)
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 10703     avg: 12017     median: 12016.5 (5%)     max: 13330 Points
8331 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7471     avg: 8356     median: 8356 (29%)     max: 9241 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7673     avg: 8748     median: 8463 (55%)     max: 10181 Points
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9027     avg: 10741     median: 9898 (50%)     max: 13821 Points
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (1%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G → 100% n=22

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 55% n=22

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 30. 03:27:51

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 12213 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761791271s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Tue, 28 Oct 2025 05:18:51 +0100 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.003s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 12213 +0.004s ... 0.007s

#8 got single benchmarks 12213 +0.008s ... 0.015s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.003s ... 0.018s

#10 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.006s ... 0.024s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.024s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.021s ... 0.046s

#13 return log +0s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)