Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G vs Samsung Exynos 850

Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 685

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 (SD685, SM6225-AD) is a mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo 265 cores (custom design, 64-Bit capable) that are divided in two clusters. A fast cluster of four cores with up to 2.8 GHz (Kryo 265 Gold - Cortex-A73 derivate) and a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.9 GHz (Kryo 265 Silver - Cortex A53 derivate). Both clusters can also be used together. According to Qualcomm the SD685 is around 15% more CPU performance and 10% more GPU performance compared to the old SD680 (thanks to higher clock speeds).

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a mid range Adreno 610 GPU with a LPDDR4 memory controller (dual-channel)  and supports Wi-Fi (802.11ac + MIMO, max. 867 Mbps), Bluetooth 5, and LTE (X11 LTE modem with up to 390 Mbps download).

The SoC is produced in 6nm.

Samsung Exynos 850

► remove from comparison Samsung Exynos 850

The Samsung Exynos 850 is a System on a Chip (SoC) for entry level smartphones (Android based). It was announced in May 2020 and the first device with it is the Samsung Galaxy A21s. The chip integrates a processor with 8 small ARM Cortex-A55 cores that clock with up to 2 GHz (octa core).

The multi threaded performance is quite good thanks to 8 cores, the single threaded performance suffers a bit from the small A55 cores, although the clock rate of up to 2 GHz can help a bit.

Furthermore, the SoC integrates a LTE modem (Cat.7 2CA up to 300 MBit/s download, Cat.13 2CA 150 MBit/s upload), a Wi-fi 5 modem (802.11ac), LPPDDR4x memory controller, eMMC 5.1 flash memory controller and a video engine for FHD 60fps encoding and decoding (H.265, H.264, VP9).

It is manufactured in the modern 8nm LPP process at Samsung and should offer a good power efficiency and therefore it is also suited for small smartphones.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 685 4GSamsung Exynos 850
CodenameKryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)Cortex-A55
SeriesQualcomm Snapdragon
Series: Snapdragon Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G « 1.9 - 2.8 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 4G compare1.8 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Kryo 265 Gold (Cortex-A73) / Silver (Cortex-A53)
Clock1900 - 2800 MHz <=2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm8 nm
FeaturesAdreno 610 GPU, X11 LTE Modem, Hexagon 686 DSP, Spectra 346 ISP, FastConnect 6200 (BT 5.2, WLAN ac), QuickCharge 3.0LTE Cat.7 / Cat.13, LPDDR4x RAM, Bluetooth 5.0, Wi-Fi 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5), 48 MP Camera, eMMC 5.1, GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, Galileo
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 610ARM Mali-G52 MP1
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.comwww.samsung.com

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 850
0.4 pt (29%)
Restrict / Search: Model: Max. age: years
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
18816 Points (15%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
min: 2676     avg: 2708     median: 2707.5 (25%)     max: 2739 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
min: 2015     avg: 2091     median: 2079 (24%)     max: 2190 Points
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 685 +
478 Points (11%)
Geekbench 6.5 - Geekbench 6.5 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 685 +
1544 Points (6%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Single-Core
100%
1 SD 685 +
477 Points (15%)
Geekbench 6.0 - Geekbench 6.0 Multi-Core
100%
1 SD 685 +
1498 Points (6%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Single-Core
min: 437     avg: 439.5     median: 439.5 (15%)     max: 442 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.5 64 Bit Multi-Core
min: 1775     avg: 1781     median: 1781 (3%)     max: 1787 Points
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
2055 Points (21%)
987 Points (10%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
7087 Points (7%)
4986 Points (5%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
min: 2534.5     avg: 2535     median: 2534.6 (3%)     max: 2534.6 ms
min: 8326.9     avg: 8842     median: 8823 (10%)     max: 9397 ms
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
min: 15695     avg: 15798     median: 15797.5 (10%)     max: 15900 Points
min: 4875     avg: 5426     median: 5454.5 (4%)     max: 5904 Points
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
min: 49     avg: 53.5     median: 53.5 (14%)     max: 58 Points
25 Points (7%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
74 Points (13%)
min: 35     avg: 36.8     median: 36.5 (7%)     max: 39 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
min: 25484     avg: 29469     median: 28792.5 (24%)     max: 34806 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
min: 20787     avg: 28847     median: 28119.5 (23%)     max: 38363 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
min: 20716     avg: 21830     median: 22122.5 (4%)     max: 22360 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
min: 45047     avg: 46029     median: 46132 (17%)     max: 46804 Points
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
min: 119981     avg: 126175     median: 125664 (12%)     max: 133391 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
min: 289659     avg: 294891     median: 294890 (14%)     max: 300122 Points
min: 121238     avg: 133665     median: 133304 (6%)     max: 146815 Points
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
min: 87675     avg: 89513     median: 89513 (22%)     max: 91351 Points
min: 36486     avg: 40832     median: 41451.5 (10%)     max: 43937 Points
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 Total Score
100%
1 SD 685 +
352825 Points (10%)
Antutu v10 - AnTuTu v10 CPU
100%
1 SD 685 +
123756 Points (12%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
4077 Points (1%)
10533 Points (1%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random write internal
100%
1 SD 685 +
22.2 MB/s (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq write internal
100%
1 SD 685 +
436 MB/s (12%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 random read internal
100%
1 SD 685 +
30.8 MB/s (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 seq read internal
100%
1 SD 685 +
586 MB/s (15%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
min: 16582     avg: 20011     median: 20010.5 (9%)     max: 23439 Points
8331 Points (4%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
min: 7305     avg: 8363     median: 8363 (30%)     max: 9421 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 5433     avg: 5445     median: 5445 (36%)     max: 5457 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 6929     avg: 7021     median: 7021 (35%)     max: 7113 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
min: 369     avg: 411.5     median: 411.5 (15%)     max: 454 Points
min: 254     avg: 264     median: 264 (10%)     max: 274 Points
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
100%
1 SD 685 +
min: 2.51     avg: 3.1     median: 3.1 (1%)     max: 3.73 Watt
min: 0     avg: 1.9     median: 2.8 (1%)     max: 3.02 Watt
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
100%
1 SD 685 +
min: 1.289     avg: 1.3     median: 1.3 (2%)     max: 1.326 Watt
min: 0     avg: 1     median: 1.2 (2%)     max: 1.894 Watt

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 4G → 100% n=15

Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 850 → 65% n=15

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
red legend - Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:
v1.34
log 22. 23:58:34

#0 ran 0s before starting gpusingle class +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 15021 +0s ... 0s

#2 checking url part for id 12728 +0s ... 0s

#3 redirected to Ajax server, took 1761170314s time from redirect:0 +0s ... 0s

#4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Wed, 22 Oct 2025 05:18:45 +0200 +0s ... 0s

#5 composed specs +0.004s ... 0.004s

#6 did output specs +0s ... 0.004s

#7 getting avg benchmarks for device 15021 +0.001s ... 0.005s

#8 got single benchmarks 15021 +0.008s ... 0.013s

#9 getting avg benchmarks for device 12728 +0.004s ... 0.017s

#10 got single benchmarks 12728 +0.007s ... 0.023s

#11 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.023s

#12 min, max, avg, median took s +0.022s ... 0.045s

#13 return log +0.001s ... 0.046s

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)