Notebookcheck Logo

Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800

Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1

► remove from comparison Qualcomm SD 4 Gen 1

The Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 (SM4375) is a mid-range ARM-based SoC largely found on Android tablets and smartphones. It features 8 Kryo cores, which are 64-bit capable and divided into two clusters. A fast cluster of two cores with up to 2 GHz based on the ARM Cortex-A78 design. And a power saving efficiency cluster with up to 1.8 GHz based on much smaller ARM Cortex-A55 cores. Both clusters can also be used together. The SD 4 Gen1 is similar to the older Snapdragon 695 but with lower clock rates.

In addition to the 8 CPU cores, the SoC integrates a lower mid range Adreno 619 GPU, a X51 5G radio (up to 2.5 Gbits download, no mmWave), a 802.11ac (Wi-Fi 5, 8x8 sounding, Dual Band, 2x2), a Bluetooth 5.2 radio, satellite positioning (GPS, QZSS, GLONASS, SBAS, Beidou and Galileo) and a video engine (support for H.265, H.264, VP8 and VP9).

The Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 is manufactured in the current 6nm process (high end SoCs use 4nm) at TSMC (6N).

MediaTek Dimensity 800

► remove from comparison Mediatek Dimensity 800

The Mediatek Dimensity 800 is a fast mid-range SoC with an integrated 5G modem. It includes four fast ARM Cortex-A76 cores at up to 2 GHz and four power efficient Cortex-A55 cores at up to 2 GHz (Octa-Core with Heterogeneous Multi-Processing). Furthermore, the chip integrates a 4 core ARM Mali-G57 MC4 GPU, a Wi-fi 5 modem, a LPDDR4x memory controller(up to 16 GB with 2133 MHz), a AI processing unit (APU 3.0) and video de- and encoding.

Compared to the similar named Dimensity 800U, the 800 offers two more big A76 cores but clocked 400 MHz lower. This means the single core performance is lower, but the multi-core performance can be better.

The Dimensity 800 is manufactured in the modern 7nm process and should be very power efficient.

ModelQualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 800
SeriesQualcomm SnapdragonMediatek
Codename2x Cortex-A78 / 6x Cortex-A55Cortex-A76 / A55
Clock1804 - 2016 MHz2000 MHz
Cores / Threads8 / 88 / 8
Technology6 nm7 nm
FeaturesAdreno 619 GPU, X51 5G Modem, Hexagon DSP, Spectra ISP, FastConnect 6200 (Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.2)4x ARM Cortex-A76 (2 GHz), 4x ARM Cortex-A55 (2 GHz), ARM Mali-G75 MC5, APU 3.0, 5G Modem (2CC), MiraVision (4K HDR Video, 80MP Photo), Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.1, UFS 2.2, 16GB LPDDR4x Support
iGPUQualcomm Adreno 619ARM Mali-G57 MP4
ArchitectureARMARM
Announced
Manufacturerwww.qualcomm.com
Series: Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 820 compare2 - 2.6 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 810 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800 « 2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 800U compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6100+ compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 compare2 - 2.4 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T820 compare2.1 - 2.7 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T770 compare2 - 2.5 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC Tangula T760 compare2 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 700 compare2 - 2.2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T765 compare2.1 - 2.3 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
MediaTek Dimensity 720 compare2 GHz8 / 8 cores Cortex-A76 / A55
UNISOC T750 compare1.8 - 2 GHz8 / 8 cores3 MB L3 Cortex-A76 / A55

Benchmarks

Performance Rating - Geekbench 5.5, PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Dimensity 800
0.8 pt (59%)
3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics
21499 Points (18%)
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
3231 Points (38%)
min: 3626     avg: 4027     median: 4026.5 (47%)     max: 4427 Points
3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics
3210 Points (37%)
min: 3593     avg: 4024     median: 4024 (46%)     max: 4455 Points
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Single-Core
642 Points (27%)
523 Points (22%)
Geekbench 5.5 - Geekbench 5.1 - 5.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
1954 Points (4%)
2143 Points (4%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
2524 Points (25%)
Geekbench 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
8649 Points (9%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core
0 Points (0%)
Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core
0 Points (0%)
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score *
2117 ms (2%)
3490 ms (4%)
Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score
19867 Points (18%)
14751 Points (13%)
WebXPRT 4 - WebXPRT 4 Score
68 Points (20%)
WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score
91 Points (19%)
56 Points (12%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 UX
59479 Points (50%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEM
49330 Points (40%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPU
89187 Points (16%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPU
99879 Points (36%)
AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total Score
297875 Points (29%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 Total Score
0 Points (0%)
Antutu v9 - AnTuTu v9 CPU
0 Points (0%)
PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests
23814 Points (3%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage 2.0 score
18074 Points (29%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 3.0
7953 Points (37%)
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0
min: 7511     avg: 7913     median: 7913 (52%)     max: 8315 Points
PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score
min: 9674     avg: 9817     median: 9816.5 (49%)     max: 9959 Points
CrossMark - CrossMark Overall
539 Points (21%)
Power Consumption - Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd *
3.2 Watt (1%)
Power Consumption - Idle Power Consumption 150cd 1min *
1.4 Watt (2%)

Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 → 100% n=7

Average Benchmarks MediaTek Dimensity 800 → 96% n=7

- Range of benchmark values for this graphics card
- Average benchmark values for this graphics card
* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance
1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation

Add one or more devices and compare

In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. You can select more than one device.

restrict list:

show all (including archived), 2024, 2023
v1.27
log 16. 16:53:02

#0 checking url part for id 15038 +0s ... 0s

#1 checking url part for id 13001 +0s ... 0s

#2 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s

#3 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Sun, 16 Jun 2024 05:37:17 +0200 +0.001s ... 0.001s

#4 composed specs +0.057s ... 0.058s

#5 did output specs +0s ... 0.058s

#6 getting avg benchmarks for device 15038 +0.003s ... 0.061s

#7 got single benchmarks 15038 +0.009s ... 0.071s

#8 getting avg benchmarks for device 13001 +0.016s ... 0.087s

#9 got single benchmarks 13001 +0.01s ... 0.096s

#10 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.096s

#11 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.046s ... 0.143s

#12 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.145s

#13 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.148s

#14 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.006s ... 0.154s

#15 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.005s ... 0.159s

#16 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.161s

#17 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.163s

#18 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.166s

#19 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.003s ... 0.169s

#20 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.171s

#21 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.032s ... 0.203s

#22 No cached benchmark found, getting uncached values +0.002s ... 0.205s

#23 min, max, avg, median took s +0.018s ... 0.223s

#24 return log +0.056s ... 0.278s

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Expert Reviews and News on Laptops, Smartphones and Tech Innovations > Benchmarks / Tech > Processor Comparison - Head 2 Head
Redaktion, 2017-09- 8 (Update: 2023-07- 1)