Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021, i7-1165G7

Specifications

Pricecompare

Reviews for the Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021, i7-1165G7

Razer Blade Stealth 13 2021 how to upgrade your NVMe SSD
Source: Ricks Tech
Support, online available, Medium, Date: 12/03/2021

80% Razer Blade Stealth 13 (Late 2020) review
Source: Techradar
Professional esports players (or aspiring ones) will find much to enjoy with the Razer Blade Stealth 13 thanks to its solid gaming performance and 13 inch screen with a 120 GHz refresh rate. Just don’t expect groundbreaking performance numbers for resource demanding games released over the past few years.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 01/13/2021
Rating: Total score: 80%

70% Razer Blade Stealth 13 (late 2020) review
Source: Tech Advisor
The latest Razer Blade Stealth 13 offers impressive mainstream gaming power inside a light, slim and sturdy case with a top-notch 1080p screen. However, the price along with a few caveats might make you look elsewhere.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 12/08/2020
Rating: Total score: 70%

Razer Blade Stealth 13 Review - Late 2020
Source: Mobile Tech Review
Lisa Gade reviews the late 2020 refresh of the Razer Blade Stealth 13.3” laptop with an Intel 11th gen Tiger Lake Core i7 and NVIDIA GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q graphics in a sleek black aluminum unibody casing. The 3.11 lb. / 1.41 kg gaming and pro apps Ultrabook is available with full HD 120Hz and 4K OLED touch screen options. The Stealth has Thunderbolt 4, a Razer Chroma keyboard, Windows Hello IR camera and Wi-Fi 6.It has few direct competitors, but some of the closest are the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14, Dell XPS 13, 13” MacBook Pro and Razer’s own new Razer Book laptops.
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 11/07/2020

Foreign Reviews

87% Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2020
Source: Chip.de DE→EN
Single Review, online available, Long, Date: 02/05/2021
Rating: Total score: 87% performance: 76% features: 76% display: 100% mobility: 99% ergonomy: 100%

Comment

Intel Iris Xe G7 96EUs: Integrated graphics card in Intel Tiger Lake G4 SoCs based on the new Gen. 12 architecture with 96 EUs (Execution Units / Shader Cluster). The clock rate depends on the processor model. The Tiger Lake chips are produced in the modern 10nm+ process at Intel.

Modern games should be playable with these graphics cards at low settings and resolutions. Casual gamers may be happy with these cards.

» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Graphics Cards and the corresponding Benchmark List.

i7-1165G7: A higher-end, quad-core processor of the Tiger Lake product family. The i7 is designed to be used in ultra-light laptops. It is manufactured on the second-gen 10 nm Intel process marketed as SuperFin and it features the Iris Xe G7 (96 EUs) iGPU running at 400 MHz to 1,300 MHz. The CPU cores run at 2.8 GHz (base clock speed @ 28 W TDP) to 4.7 GHz (single-core Boost frequency). This i7 was the second-fastest CPU of the TGL-UP3 lineup when Intel initially launched the series in 2020.» Further information can be found in our Comparison of Mobile Processsors.

13.30":

Above all, this display size is used for subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles. For all three types, this size is quite large. The biggest variety of subnotebooks is represented with this size.

Large display-sizes allow higher resolutions. So, details like letters are bigger. On the other hand, the power consumption is lower with small screen diagonals and the devices are smaller, more lightweight and cheaper.

1.41 kg:

This weight is typical for big tablets, small subnotebooks, ultrabooks and convertibles with a 10-11 inch display-diagonal.

Razer: Razer USA Ltd. is an American hardware manufacturer founded in 1998. The focus is on gaming devices as well as accessories; traditionally computer mice. The products were often named after fables or animals. However, Razer also offers laptops under the series name "Blade".

There are reviews on the Razer Blade series since 2013, but not overly many. The market share in the laptop market is low and the ratings are average (as of 2016).

79%: This rating is not convincing. The laptop is evaluated below average, this is not really a recommendation for purchase.

» Further information can be found in our Notebook Purchase Guide.

Similar devices from a different Manufacturer

Devices from a different Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU

Devices with the same GPU and/or Screen Size